alejandro-alvarez-sonarsource wrote: > How does this relate to the other PR #79470 (why comes this new patch when > there is another for the same problem)? I think it is better to first commit > #79470, then add remaining functions `getc`, `putc`, `vfscanf`, `vfprintf`. > These should be added anyway in a separate change because it is less related > to invalidation.
I started the work on this patch before #79470 was submitted, and didn't double-check if someone had tackled the same in the meantime. My bad. I agree on waiting for that one to land and strip this one down to the new set of functions. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82476 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
