Dear Casey
Thank you for the update and bug report.
Best Regards
Francois Scheurer
From: Casey Bodley
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2019 4:53 PM
To: Scheurer François; ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
Subject: Re: is rgw crypt default encryption key long term supporte
Hello,
Maybe somone was fighting with this kind of stuck in ceph already.
This is production cluster, can't/don't want to make wrong steps,
please advice, what to do.
After changing of one failed disk (it was osd-7) on our cluster ceph
didn't recover to HEALTH_OK, it stopped in state:
Hi,
This looks like a tunables issue.
What is the output of `ceph osd crush show-tunables `
-- Dan
On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 11:19 AM Luk wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Maybe somone was fighting with this kind of stuck in ceph already.
> This is production cluster, can't/don't want to make wrong s
Hi,
here is the output:
ceph osd crush show-tunables
{
"choose_local_tries": 0,
"choose_local_fallback_tries": 0,
"choose_total_tries": 100,
"chooseleaf_descend_once": 1,
"chooseleaf_vary_r": 1,
"chooseleaf_stable": 0,
"straw_calc_version": 1,
"allowed_bucket_algs"
Ahh I was thinking of chooseleaf_vary_r, which you already have.
So probably not related to tunables. What is your `ceph osd tree` ?
By the way, 12.2.9 has an unrelated bug (details
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/36686)
AFAIU you will just need to update to v12.2.11 or v12.2.12 for that fix.
-- D
Here is ceph osd tree, in first post there is also ceph osd df tree:
https://pastebin.com/Vs75gpwZ
> Ahh I was thinking of chooseleaf_vary_r, which you already have.
> So probably not related to tunables. What is your `ceph osd tree` ?
> By the way, 12.2.9 has an unrelated bug (details
> http:
Hi,
Something seems off in weight and sizes of hosts: ssdstor-a01, ssdstor-b01
and ssdstor-c01.
ssdstor-c01 has a weight of 0.4 while the size ~10TiB so i would expect the
weight to be around 10 in stead of 0.4
Same goes for the other two nodes i mentioned above.
Could you explain this?
Kind re
Title: Re: [ceph-users] problem with degraded PG
Hi, this another case - this three storage nodes were added few weeks ago to ssd pool. I don't understand this kind of behavior also and was writing about this on ceph-devel few weeks ago (didn't get answer) :/.
https://www.spinics.net/lists/ceph-
Hi,
We have a standalone ceph cluster v13.2.6 and wanted to replicate it to another
DC. After going through "Migrating a Single Site
System to Multi-Site" and "Configure a Secondary Zone" from
http://docs.ceph.com/docs/master/radosgw/multisite/, We have setted
up all buckets to "disable replicat
Hi Ceph-Uers,
I noticed that Soft Iron now have hardware acceleration for Erasure
Coding[1], this is interesting as the CPU overhead can be a problem in
addition to the extra disk I/O required for EC pools.
Does anyone know if any other work is ongoing to support generic FPGA
Hardware Acceleratio
Hello,
All kudos are going to friends from Wroclaw, PL :)
It was as simple as typo...
There was osd added two times to crushmap due to (this commands where
run over week ago - didn't have problem then, it showed up after
replacing another osd - osd-7):
ceph osd crush add osd.112 0.00 roo
Den fre 14 juni 2019 kl 13:58 skrev Sean Redmond :
> Hi Ceph-Uers,
> I noticed that Soft Iron now have hardware acceleration for Erasure
> Coding[1], this is interesting as the CPU overhead can be a problem in
> addition to the extra disk I/O required for EC pools.
> Does anyone know if any other
Also the picture I saw at Cephalocon - which could have been
inaccurate, looked to me as if it multiplied the data path.
On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 8:27 AM Janne Johansson wrote:
>
> Den fre 14 juni 2019 kl 13:58 skrev Sean Redmond :
>>
>> Hi Ceph-Uers,
>> I noticed that Soft Iron now have hardware
I can't speak to the SoftIron solution, but I have done some testing on an
all-SSD environment comparing latency, CPU, etc between using the Intel ISA
plugin and using Jerasure. Very little difference is seen in CPU and
capability in my tests, so I am not sure of the benefit.
David Byte
Sr. Te
Hi James,
Thanks for your comments.
I think the CPU burn is more of a concern to soft iron here as they are
using low power ARM64 CPU's to keep the power draw low compared to using
Intel CPU's where like you say the problem maybe less of a concern.
Using less power by using ARM64 and providing E
Den fre 14 juni 2019 kl 15:47 skrev Sean Redmond :
> Hi James,
> Thanks for your comments.
> I think the CPU burn is more of a concern to soft iron here as they are
> using low power ARM64 CPU's to keep the power draw low compared to using
> Intel CPU's where like you say the problem maybe less of
Hello,
I am using the latest AWS PHP SDK to create a bucket.
Every time I attempt to do this in the log I see:
2019-06-14 11:42:53.092 7fdff5459700 1 civetweb: 0x55c5450249d8: redacted - -
[14/Jun/2019:11:42:53 -0400] "PUT / HTTP/1.1" 405 405 - aws-sdk-php/3.100.3
GuzzleHttp/6.3.3 curl/7.29.0
I wonder if anyone has dealt with deep-scrubbing being really heavy when it
kicks of at the defined start time?
I currently have a script that kicks off and runs deep-scrub every 10 minutes
on the oldest un-deep-scrubbed pg
this script runs 24/7 regardless of when deep scrub is scheduled
my cep
Hi,
to the people running https://shaman.ceph.com/:
please update the repo for python-rtslib so recent ceph-iscsi packages
can be installed which need python-rtslib >= 2.1.fb68
shaman python-rtslib version is 2.1.fb67
upstream python-rtslib version is 2.1.fb69
thanks + thanks for running this
Hi. Firstly thanks to all involved in this great mailing list, I learn lots
from it every day.
We are running Ceph with a huge amount of success to store website
themes/templates across a large collection of websites. We are very pleased
with the solution in every way.
The only issue we have, whi
If you don't figure out how to enable it on your monitor, you can always
disable it to squash the warnings
*ceph config set mon.node01 ms_bind_msgr2 false*
On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 12:11 PM Bob Farrell wrote:
> Hi. Firstly thanks to all involved in this great mailing list, I learn
> lots from it
Hi everyone,
I am facing a strange behavious from ceph-deploy.
I try to add a new node to our cluster :
ceph-deploy install --no-adjust-repos sd0051
Everything seems to work fine but the new bucket (host) is not created in the
crushmap and when I try to add a new osd to that host, the osd is cre
This procedure worked for us:
http://docs.ceph.com/docs/master/releases/nautilus/#v14-2-0-nautilus
13. To enable the new v2 network protocol, issue the following command:
ceph mon enable-msgr2
This will instruct all monitors that bind to the old default port 6789 for
the legacy v1 prot
Yeah, msgr2 still makes some problems sometimes.
Try to (re-)run "ceph mon enable-msgr2" and if that doesn't help i'd just
delete and re-create the mon (usually way easier than playing around with
the mon map manually).
Paul
--
Paul Emmerich
Looking for help with your Ceph cluster? Contact us
On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 6:23 PM Brett Chancellor
wrote:
> If you don't figure out how to enable it on your monitor, you can always
> disable it to squash the warnings
> *ceph config set mon.node01 ms_bind_msgr2 false*
>
No, that just disables msgr2 on that mon.
Use this option if you want to di
On Thu, 13 Jun 2019, Neha Ojha wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> There has been some interest in a feature that helps users to mute
> health warnings. There is a trello card[1] associated with it and
> we've had some discussion[2] in the past in a CDM about it. In
> general, we want to understand a few th
Hi Drew,
Judging by the "PUT /" in the request line, this request is using the
virtual hosted bucket format [1]. This means the bucket name is part of
the dns name and Host header, rather than in the path of the http
request. Making this work in radosgw takes a little extra configuration
[2].
On 6/12/19 11:49 AM, Peter Eisch wrote:
Hi,
Could someone be able to point me to a blog or documentation page which helps
me resolve the issues noted below?
All nodes are Luminous, 12.2.12; one realm, one zonegroup (clustered haproxies
fronting), two zones (three rgw in each); All endpoint re
Bob;
Have you verified that port 3300 is open for TCP on that host?
The extra host firewall rules for v2 protocol caused me all kinds of grief when
I was setting up my MONs.
Thank you,
Dominic L. Hilsbos, MBA
Director – Information Technology
Perform Air International Inc.
dhils...@performai
Little update :
I check one osd I've installed even if the host isn't not present in the
crushmap (or in cluster I guess) and I found this :
monclient: wait_auth_rotating timed out after 30
osd.xxx 0 unable to obtain rotating service keys; retrying
I alosy add the host to the admins host :
ceph-
I have a monitor which I just can't seem to get to join the quorum, even
after injecting a monmap from one of the other servers.[1] I use NTP on
all servers and also manually verified the clocks are synchronized.
My monitors are named: ceph0, ceph2, xe, and tc
I'm transitioning away from the ce
31 matches
Mail list logo
