Also the picture I saw at Cephalocon - which could have been inaccurate, looked to me as if it multiplied the data path.
On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 8:27 AM Janne Johansson <icepic...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Den fre 14 juni 2019 kl 13:58 skrev Sean Redmond <sean.redmo...@gmail.com>: >> >> Hi Ceph-Uers, >> I noticed that Soft Iron now have hardware acceleration for Erasure >> Coding[1], this is interesting as the CPU overhead can be a problem in >> addition to the extra disk I/O required for EC pools. >> Does anyone know if any other work is ongoing to support generic FPGA >> Hardware Acceleration for EC pools, or if this is just a vendor specific >> feature. >> >> [1] >> https://www.theregister.co.uk/2019/05/20/softiron_unleashes_accepherator_an_erasure_coding_accelerator_for_ceph/ > > > Are there numbers anywhere to see how "tough" on a CPU it would be to > calculate an EC code compared to "writing a sector to > a disk on a remote server and getting an ack back" ? To my very untrained > eye, it seems like a very small part of the whole picture, > especially if you are meant to buy a ton of cards to do it. > > -- > May the most significant bit of your life be positive. > _______________________________________________ > ceph-users mailing list > ceph-users@lists.ceph.com > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
