On Wed, 23 Mar 2016, Loic Dachary wrote:
> On 23/03/2016 01:12, Chris Dunlop wrote:
> > Hi Loïc,
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 01:03:06AM +0100, Loic Dachary wrote:
> >> On 23/03/2016 00:39, Chris Dunlop wrote:
> >>> "The old OS'es" that were being supported up to v0.94.5 includes debian
> >>> w
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 01:22:45AM +0100, Loic Dachary wrote:
> On 23/03/2016 01:12, Chris Dunlop wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 01:03:06AM +0100, Loic Dachary wrote:
>>> On 23/03/2016 00:39, Chris Dunlop wrote:
"The old OS'es" that were being supported up to v0.94.5 includes debian
wh
On 23/03/2016 01:12, Chris Dunlop wrote:
> Hi Loïc,
>
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 01:03:06AM +0100, Loic Dachary wrote:
>> On 23/03/2016 00:39, Chris Dunlop wrote:
>>> "The old OS'es" that were being supported up to v0.94.5 includes debian
>>> wheezy. It would be quite surprising and unexpected to
Hi Loïc,
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 01:03:06AM +0100, Loic Dachary wrote:
> On 23/03/2016 00:39, Chris Dunlop wrote:
>> "The old OS'es" that were being supported up to v0.94.5 includes debian
>> wheezy. It would be quite surprising and unexpected to drop support for an
>> OS in the middle of a stable
Hi Chris,
On 23/03/2016 00:39, Chris Dunlop wrote:
> Hi Loïc,
>
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 12:14:27AM +0100, Loic Dachary wrote:
>> On 22/03/2016 23:49, Chris Dunlop wrote:
>>> Hi Stable Release Team for v0.94,
>>>
>>> Let's try again... Any news on a release of v0.94.6 for debian wheezy
>>> (bpo
Hi Loïc,
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 12:14:27AM +0100, Loic Dachary wrote:
> On 22/03/2016 23:49, Chris Dunlop wrote:
>> Hi Stable Release Team for v0.94,
>>
>> Let's try again... Any news on a release of v0.94.6 for debian wheezy
>> (bpo70)?
>
> I don't think publishing a debian wheezy backport fo
On 22/03/2016 23:49, Chris Dunlop wrote:
> Hi Stable Release Team for v0.94,
>
> Let's try again... Any news on a release of v0.94.6 for debian wheezy (bpo70)?
I don't think publishing a debian wheezy backport for v0.94.6 is planned. Maybe
it's a good opportunity to initiate a community effort
Hi Stable Release Team for v0.94,
Let's try again... Any news on a release of v0.94.6 for debian wheezy (bpo70)?
Cheers,
Chris
On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 12:43:15PM +1100, Chris Dunlop wrote:
> Hi Chen,
>
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 12:40:28AM +, Chen, Xiaoxi wrote:
>> It’s already there, in
>
Hi Stable Release Team for v0.94,
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 11:00:06AM +1100, Chris Dunlop wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 06:32:18PM +0700, Loic Dachary wrote:
>> I think you misread what Sage wrote : "The intention was to
>> continue building stable releases (0.94.x) on the old list of
>> support
Hi Chen,
On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 12:40:28AM +, Chen, Xiaoxi wrote:
> It’s already there, in
> http://download.ceph.com/debian-hammer/pool/main/c/ceph/.
I can only see ceph*_0.94.6-1~bpo80+1_amd64.deb there. Debian wheezy would
be bpo70.
Cheers,
Chris
> On 3/17/16, 7:20 AM, "Chris Dunlop"
Hi Loic,
On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 06:32:18PM +0700, Loic Dachary wrote:
> I think you misread what Sage wrote : "The intention was to
> continue building stable releases (0.94.x) on the old list of
> supported platforms (which inclues 12.04 and el6)". In other
> words, the old OS'es are still suppo
be released this month,
should Sage decide it's worth it.
Cheers
>
> Cheers, Dan
>
>
>> Cheers
>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Vladislav Odintsov
>>>
>>> ____
>>&
one unfortunate regression in .6:
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/14873
Cheers, Dan
> Cheers
>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Vladislav Odintsov
>>
>>
>> From: ceph-users on behalf of Chris
>> Dunlop
>
eil
> Cc: Loic Dachary; ceph-de...@vger.kernel.org; ceph-us...@ceph.com
> Subject: Re: [ceph-users] v0.94.6 Hammer released
>
> Hi,
>
> The "old list of supported platforms" includes debian wheezy.
> Will v0.94.6 be built for this?
>
> Chris
>
> On Mon, Fe
ntsov
From: ceph-users on behalf of Chris Dunlop
Sent: Wednesday, March 2, 2016 04:06
To: Sage Weil
Cc: Loic Dachary; ceph-de...@vger.kernel.org; ceph-us...@ceph.com
Subject: Re: [ceph-users] v0.94.6 Hammer released
Hi,
The "old list of supported
Hi,
The "old list of supported platforms" includes debian wheezy.
Will v0.94.6 be built for this?
Chris
On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 10:57:53AM -0500, Sage Weil wrote:
> The intention was to continue building stable releases (0.94.x) on the old
> list of supported platforms (which inclues 12.04 and
If it can help, it's really very little work for me to send the hammer
SRPM to our Koji build system.
I think the real work will come if people starting asking for jewel
builds on el6 and other old platforms. In that case, if a reputable
organisation offers to maintain the builds (+ deps), then IM
On 29/02/2016 22:49, Nathan Cutler wrote:
>> The basic idea is to copy the packages that are build by gitbuilders or by
>> the buildpackage teuthology task in a central place. Because these packages
>> are built, for development versions as well as stable versions[2]. And they
>> are tested vi
I've created a pad at http://pad.ceph.com/p/development-releases for the next
CDM ( see http://tracker.ceph.com/projects/ceph/wiki/Planning for details).
On 29/02/2016 22:49, Nathan Cutler wrote:
> The basic idea is to copy the packages that are build by gitbuilders or by
> the buildpackage teut
..@vger.kernel.org;
> >> ceph-users; Sage Weil
> >> Subject: Re: [ceph-users] v0.94.6 Hammer released
> >>
> >> Can we make any kind of general procedure to make packages so that almost
> >> everyone in community build packages by themselves and reduce developer
The basic idea is to copy the packages that are build by gitbuilders or by the
buildpackage teuthology task in a central place. Because these packages are
built, for development versions as well as stable versions[2]. And they are
tested via teuthology. The packages that are published on http:/
everyone in community build packages by themselves and reduce developers
>> work load caused by too much requirement -;
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Shinobu
>>
>> ----- Original Message -
>> From: "Odintsov Vladislav"
>> To: "Franklin M. Sile
ing which direction is
>> better ... maybe both.
>>
>> -- Dan
>> CERN IT Storage Group
>>
>>
>>> ____________
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Vladislav Odintsov
>>>
>>>
t;
>> Vladislav Odintsov
>>
>> ________
>> From: Shinobu Kinjo
>> Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 14:11
>> To: Odintsov Vladislav
>> Cc: Franklin M. Siler; Xiaoxi Chen; ceph-de...@vger.kernel.org; ceph-users;
>> Sage We
,
>
> Vladislav Odintsov
>
>
> From: Shinobu Kinjo
> Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 14:11
> To: Odintsov Vladislav
> Cc: Franklin M. Siler; Xiaoxi Chen; ceph-de...@vger.kernel.org; ceph-users;
> Sage Weil
> Subject: Re: [ceph-users] v0.94
> Regards,
>
> Vladislav Odintsov
>
>
> From: Shinobu Kinjo
> Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 14:11
> To: Odintsov Vladislav
> Cc: Franklin M. Siler; Xiaoxi Chen; ceph-de...@vger.kernel.org; ceph-users;
> Sage Weil
> Subject
...@vger.kernel.org; ceph-users;
Sage Weil
Subject: Re: [ceph-users] v0.94.6 Hammer released
Can we make any kind of general procedure to make packages so that almost
everyone in community build packages by themselves and reduce developers work
load caused by too much requirement -;
Cheers,
Shinobu
anklin M. Siler" , "Xiaoxi Chen"
Cc: ceph-de...@vger.kernel.org, "ceph-users" , "Sage Weil"
Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 6:04:02 PM
Subject: Re: [ceph-users] v0.94.6 Hammer released
Hi all,
should we build el6 packages ourself or, it's hoped that
Siler
Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 05:03
To: Xiaoxi Chen
Cc: Alfredo Deza; Dan van der Ster; Sage Weil; ceph-de...@vger.kernel.org;
ceph-users
Subject: Re: [ceph-users] v0.94.6 Hammer released
On Feb 25, 2016, at 1839, Xiaoxi Chen wrote:
> Will we build package for ubuntu 12.04 (Precise)?
ed ssh
-t?
Regards,
Vladislav Odintsov
From: ceph-users on behalf of Alfredo Deza
Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2016 22:59
To: Udo Lembke
Cc: ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
Subject: Re: [ceph-users] v0.94.6 Hammer released
On Thu, Feb 25, 20
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 7:00 AM, Udo Lembke wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am 24.02.2016 um 17:27 schrieb Alfredo Deza:
>> On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 4:31 AM, Dan van der Ster
>> wrote:
>>> Thanks Sage, looking forward to some scrub randomization.
>>>
>>> Were binaries built for el6? http://download.ceph.com/rpm
Hi,
Am 24.02.2016 um 17:27 schrieb Alfredo Deza:
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 4:31 AM, Dan van der Ster wrote:
>> Thanks Sage, looking forward to some scrub randomization.
>>
>> Were binaries built for el6? http://download.ceph.com/rpm-hammer/el6/x86_64/
>
> We are no longer building binaries for e
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 4:31 AM, Dan van der Ster wrote:
> Thanks Sage, looking forward to some scrub randomization.
>
> Were binaries built for el6? http://download.ceph.com/rpm-hammer/el6/x86_64/
We are no longer building binaries for el6. Just for Centos 7, Ubuntu
Trusty, and Debian Jessie.
>
Thanks Sage, looking forward to some scrub randomization.
Were binaries built for el6? http://download.ceph.com/rpm-hammer/el6/x86_64/
Cheers, Dan
On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 5:01 PM, Sage Weil wrote:
> This Hammer point release fixes a range of bugs, most notably a fix for
> unbounded growth of t
34 matches
Mail list logo
