Hi Dan, On 02/03/2016 19:48, Dan van der Ster wrote: > Hi Loic, > > On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 12:32 PM, Loic Dachary <l...@dachary.org> wrote: >> >> >> On 02/03/2016 17:15, Odintsov Vladislav wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> it looks very strange, that LTS release suddenly stopped support of one of >>> OS'es in the middle of lifecycle. Especially when there are no technical >>> problems. >>> How can we help community with building hammer branch officially? >>> >> >> Hi, >> >> I think you misread what Sage wrote : "The intention was to continue >> building stable releases (0.94.x) on the old list of supported platforms >> (which inclues 12.04 and el6)". In other words, the old OS'es are still >> supported. Their absence is a glitch in the release process that will be >> fixed. >> > > BTW, has there been any discussion to do 0.94.7 on a shorter interval? > There is at least one unfortunate regression in .6: > http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/14873
It's an incentive to have 0.94.7, indeed. It could be released this month, should Sage decide it's worth it. Cheers > > Cheers, Dan > > >> Cheers >> >>> ________________________________ >>> Regards, >>> >>> Vladislav Odintsov >>> >>> ________________________________________ >>> From: ceph-users <ceph-users-boun...@lists.ceph.com> on behalf of Chris >>> Dunlop <ch...@onthe.net.au> >>> Sent: Wednesday, March 2, 2016 04:06 >>> To: Sage Weil >>> Cc: Loic Dachary; ceph-de...@vger.kernel.org; ceph-us...@ceph.com >>> Subject: Re: [ceph-users] v0.94.6 Hammer released >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> The "old list of supported platforms" includes debian wheezy. >>> Will v0.94.6 be built for this? >>> >>> Chris >>> >>> On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 10:57:53AM -0500, Sage Weil wrote: >>>> The intention was to continue building stable releases (0.94.x) on the old >>>> list of supported platforms (which inclues 12.04 and el6). I think it was >>>> just an oversight that they weren't built this time around. I the >>>> overhead to doing so is just keeping a 12.04 and el6 jenkins build slave >>>> around. >>>> >>>> Doing this builds in the existing environment sounds much better than >>>> trying to pull in externally built binaries... >>>> >>>> sage >>> _______________________________________________ >>> ceph-users mailing list >>> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com >>> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com >>> >> >> -- >> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre >> _______________________________________________ >> ceph-users mailing list >> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com >> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com > -- Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
