On 29/02/2016 22:49, Nathan Cutler wrote: >> The basic idea is to copy the packages that are build by gitbuilders or by >> the buildpackage teuthology task in a central place. Because these packages >> are built, for development versions as well as stable versions[2]. And they >> are tested via teuthology. The packages that are published on >> http://ceph.com/ are rebuilt from scratch, using the process that Alfredo >> described. This is fine for the supported platforms and for the stable >> releases. But for the development releases and the platforms that are no >> longer supported but still built by gibuilders, we could just copy the >> packages over. >> >> Does that sound sensible ? > > Hi Loic: > > Community packages for "deprecated" platforms ("deprecated" in the sense that > the Ceph developers are no longer testing on them) would be welcomed by many, > I imagine. And the additional workload for the Stable Releases team is not > large. The question is, where will the packages be copied *to*? >
How does archive.ceph.com sound ? -- Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
