Quoting Ignat Zapolsky (ignat.zapol...@ammeon.com):
> Hi,
>
> Just a question what is recommended docker container image to use for
> ceph ?
>
> CEPH website us saying that 12.2.x is LTR but there are at least 2
> more releases in dockerhub – 13 and 14.
>
> Would there be any advise on selection
On 5/8/19 10:52 PM, Gregory Farnum wrote:
> On Wed, May 8, 2019 at 5:33 AM Dietmar Rieder
> wrote:
>>
>> On 5/8/19 1:55 PM, Paul Emmerich wrote:
>>> Nautilus properly accounts metadata usage, so nothing changed it just
>>> shows up correctly now ;)
>>
>> OK, but then I'm not sure I understand why
Hi Folks,
I'm having trouble getting some of my OSDs to boot. At some point, these
disks got very full. I fixed the rule that was causing that, and they
are on average ~30% full now.
I'm getting the following in my logs:
-1> 2019-05-08 16:05:18.956 7fdc7adbbf00 -1
/home/jenkins-build/bui
On Mon, May 6, 2019 at 6:41 PM Kyle Brantley wrote:
>
> On 5/6/2019 6:37 PM, Gregory Farnum wrote:
> > Hmm, I didn't know we had this functionality before. It looks to be
> > changing quite a lot at the moment, so be aware this will likely
> > require reconfiguring later.
>
> Good to know, and not
On Wed, May 8, 2019 at 10:05 AM Ansgar Jazdzewski
wrote:
>
> hi folks,
>
> we try to build a new NAS using the vfs_ceph modul from samba 4.9.
>
> if i try to open the share i recive the error:
>
> May 8 06:58:44 nas01 smbd[375700]: 2019-05-08 06:58:44.732830
> 7ff3d5f6e700 0 -- 10.100.219.51:0/3
On Wed, May 8, 2019 at 5:33 AM Dietmar Rieder
wrote:
>
> On 5/8/19 1:55 PM, Paul Emmerich wrote:
> > Nautilus properly accounts metadata usage, so nothing changed it just
> > shows up correctly now ;)
>
> OK, but then I'm not sure I understand why the increase was not sudden
> (with the update) bu
On Wed, May 8, 2019 at 2:37 AM Marco Stuurman
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I've got an issue with the data in our pool. A RBD image containing 4TB+ data
> has moved over to a different pool after a crush rule set change, which
> should not be possible. Besides that it loops over and over to start
> remap
Eric,
Yes we do :
time s3cmd ls s3://[BUCKET]/ --no-ssl and we get near 2min 30 secs for list the
bucket.
If we instantly hit again the query it normally timeouts.
Could you explain a little more "
With respect to your earlier message in which you included the output of `ceph
df`, I believe
Hi Manuel,
My response is interleaved.
On 5/7/19 7:32 PM, EDH - Manuel Rios Fernandez wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
> This looks like something the software developer must do, not something than
> Storage provider must allow no?
True -- so you're using `radosgw-admin bucket list --bucket=XYZ` to list
th
hi folks,
we try to build a new NAS using the vfs_ceph modul from samba 4.9.
if i try to open the share i recive the error:
May 8 06:58:44 nas01 smbd[375700]: 2019-05-08 06:58:44.732830
7ff3d5f6e700 0 -- 10.100.219.51:0/3414601814 >> 10.100.219.11:6789/0
pipe(0x7ff3cc00c350 sd=6 :45626 s=1 pgs
Hey Cephers,
There is a new OSS software called Delta Lake https://delta.io/
It is compatible with HDFS but seems ripe to add Ceph support as a backend
storage. Just want to put this on the radar for any feelers.
Best
___
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-us
On Wed, May 8, 2019 at 4:10 AM Stolte, Felix wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> we are running a luminous cluster and using the cephfs for fileservices. We
> use Tivoli Storage Manager to backup all data in the ceph filesystem to tape
> for disaster recovery. Backup runs on two dedicated servers, which mo
Hi Paul,
we are using Kernel 4.15.0-47.
Regards
Felix
IT-Services
Telefon 02461 61-9243
E-Mail: f.sto...@fz-juelich.de
-
-
Fors
On Wed, May 8, 2019 at 7:26 AM wrote:
>
> Hi.
>
> I'm fishing a bit here.
>
> What we see is that when we have new VM/RBD/SSD-backed images the
> time before they are "fully written" first time - can be lousy
> performance. Sort of like they are thin-provisioned and the subsequent
> growing of the
On 5/8/19 1:55 PM, Paul Emmerich wrote:
> Nautilus properly accounts metadata usage, so nothing changed it just
> shows up correctly now ;)
OK, but then I'm not sure I understand why the increase was not sudden
(with the update) but it kept growing steadily over days.
~Dietmar
--
__
Hi,
Just a question what is recommended docker container image to use for ceph ?
CEPH website us saying that 12.2.x is LTR but there are at least 2 more
releases in dockerhub – 13 and 14.
Would there be any advise on selection between 3 releases ?
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
--
This email
smime.p7m
Description: S/MIME encrypted message
___
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
Which kernel are you using on the clients?
Paul
--
Paul Emmerich
Looking for help with your Ceph cluster? Contact us at https://croit.io
croit GmbH
Freseniusstr. 31h
81247 München
www.croit.io
Tel: +49 89 1896585 90
On Wed, May 8, 2019 at 1:10 PM Stolte, Felix wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> we are
Nautilus properly accounts metadata usage, so nothing changed it just
shows up correctly now ;)
Paul
--
Paul Emmerich
Looking for help with your Ceph cluster? Contact us at https://croit.io
croit GmbH
Freseniusstr. 31h
81247 München
www.croit.io
Tel: +49 89 1896585 90
On Wed, May 8, 2019 at
Hi.
I'm fishing a bit here.
What we see is that when we have new VM/RBD/SSD-backed images the
time before they are "fully written" first time - can be lousy
performance. Sort of like they are thin-provisioned and the subsequent
growing of the images in Ceph deliveres a performance hit.
Does anyo
Hi folks,
we are running a luminous cluster and using the cephfs for fileservices. We use
Tivoli Storage Manager to backup all data in the ceph filesystem to tape for
disaster recovery. Backup runs on two dedicated servers, which mounted the
cephfs via kernel mount. In order to complete the Ba
Hi,
we just recently upgraded our cluster from luminous 12.2.10 to nautilus
14.2.1 and I noticed a massive increase of the space used on the cephfs
metadata pool although the used space in the 2 data pools basically did
not change. See the attached graph (NOTE: log10 scale on y-axis)
Is there an
Hi,
I've got an issue with the data in our pool. A RBD image containing 4TB+
data has moved over to a different pool after a crush rule set change,
which should not be possible. Besides that it loops over and over to start
remapping and backfilling (goes up to 377 pg active+clean then suddenly
dro
smime.p7m
Description: S/MIME encrypted message
___
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
Hi,
just a comment (and please correct my if I'm wrong)
There are no "folders" in S3. A bucket is a plain list of objects. What
you recognize as a folder is an artificial construct, e.g. usual path
delimiter used by S3 access tool to create "folders".
As a result, listing a bucket wit
25 matches
Mail list logo
