Hi Manuel, My response is interleaved.
On 5/7/19 7:32 PM, EDH - Manuel Rios Fernandez wrote: > Hi Eric, > > This looks like something the software developer must do, not something than > Storage provider must allow no? True -- so you're using `radosgw-admin bucket list --bucket=XYZ` to list the bucket? Currently we do not allow for a "--allow-unordered" flag, but there's no reason we could not. I'm working on the PR now, although it might take some time before it gets to v13. > Strange behavior is that sometimes bucket is list fast in less than 30 secs > and other time it timeout after 600 secs, the bucket contains 875 folders > with a total object number of 6Millions. > > I don’t know how a simple list of 875 folder can timeout after 600 secs Burkhard Linke's comment is on target. The "folders" are a trick using delimiters. A bucket is really entirely flat without a hierarchy. > We bought several NVMe Optane for do 4 partitions in each PCIe card and get > up 1.000.000 IOPS for Index. Quite expensive because we calc that our index > is just 4GB (100-200M objects),waiting those cards. Any more idea? With respect to your earlier message in which you included the output of `ceph df`, I believe the reason that default.rgw.buckets.index shows as 0 bytes used is that the index uses the metadata branch of the object to store its data. > Regards Eric _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
