[CentOS] centos 7.1 and compiz

I have compiz installed on centos 6.6, and I’ve been testing 7.1, but I can't find any info on installing compiz on 7.1. Is there any info for this or is it not supported yet? Thanks, -wes ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos

Re: [CentOS] centos 7.1 and compiz

> On Jun 27, 2015, at 11:36 AM, Wes James wrote: > > I have compiz installed on centos 6.6, and I’ve been testing 7.1, but I can't > find any info on installing compiz on 7.1. Is there any info for this or is > it not supported yet? > > Thanks, > > -wes

Re: [CentOS] centos 7.1 and compiz

On Jun 27, 2015, at 11:37 AM, Wes James wrote: I have compiz installed on centos 6.6, and I’ve been testing 7.1, but I can't find any info on installing compiz on 7.1. Is there any info for this or is it not supported yet?   I installed the kde option for centos 7.1 and it has de

Re: [CentOS] centos 7.1 and compiz

On Jul 17, 2015, at 11:32 AM, Fred Smith wrote: On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 05:14:51PM +, Wes James wrote: On Jun 27, 2015, at 11:37 AM, Wes James wrote: I have compiz installed on centos 6.6, and I’ve been testing 7.1, but I can't find any info on installing compiz on 7.1. Is ther

Re: [CentOS] centos 7.1 and compiz

On Jul 17, 2015, at 12:04 PM, Fred Smith wrote: On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 05:39:58PM +, Wes James wrote:   snip my guess is that it depends on which ISO image you used. I iinstalled a non-productized version from a DVD that installed Gnome, then I added the epel repo and installed

Re: [CentOS] centos 7.1 and compiz

> On Jul 17, 2015, at 12:03 PM, Fred Smith > wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 05:39:58PM +0000, Wes James wrote: >> > > my guess is that it depends on which ISO image you used. > > I iinstalled a non-productized version from a DVD that installed Gnome, &g

Re: [CentOS] centos 7.1 and compiz

> On Jul 17, 2015, at 12:22 PM, Wes James wrote: > > >> On Jul 17, 2015, at 12:03 PM, Fred Smith >> wrote: >> >> On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 05:39:58PM +, Wes James wrote: >>> >> >> my guess is that it depends on which ISO image you us

[CentOS] install nvidia driver on centos 7.1

I’m trying to install the nvidia driver on centos 7.1. I see instructions to remove nouveau and disable the kernel module. When I create this file and put this options in: disable-nouveau.conf blacklist nouveau options nouveau modeset=0 and reboot, and run the nvidia installer again, it says

Re: [CentOS] install nvidia driver on centos 7.1

> On Jul 20, 2015, at 2:20 PM, Jonathan Billings wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 02:16:02PM -0600, Wes James wrote: >> I’m trying to install the nvidia driver on centos 7.1. I see >> instructions to remove nouveau and disable the kernel module. When > > What in

Re: [CentOS] install nvidia driver on centos 7.1

> On Jul 20, 2015, at 2:31 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > > On 07/20/2015 03:24 PM, Wes James wrote: >> >>> On Jul 20, 2015, at 2:20 PM, Jonathan Billings wrote: >>> >>> On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 02:16:02PM -0600, Wes James wrote: >>>> I’m try

Re: [CentOS] install nvidia driver on centos 7.1

> On Jul 20, 2015, at 2:41 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote: > > You may want to start from this page: > > http://elrepo.org/tiki/nvidia-detect > > Akemi OK. Thanks :) -wes ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org h

Re: [CentOS] install nvidia driver on centos 7.1

Thanks all for the nvidia tips (especially elrepo.org). I have the nvidia driver installed and working on 7.1! -wes ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] install nvidia driver on centos 7.1

> On Jul 20, 2015, at 3:19 PM, Ned Slider wrote: > > > > On 20/07/15 21:47, Wes James wrote: >> >>> On Jul 20, 2015, at 2:41 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote: >> >> >> >>> >>> You may want to start from this page: >>> >

Re: [CentOS] Firefox 39 - SOLVED

> On Jul 22, 2015, at 5:40 AM, TE Dukes wrote: > >> > Hello, > > I ws able to install Chrome on a Windows machine and fixed the problem. > > Thanks!! > You can use the script here to install chrome on centOS: http://chrome.richardlloyd.org.uk -wes

[CentOS] Desktop icons/files/etc. kde CentOS 7.1

I've googled and looked in the settings, but I don't see a way to turn desktop icons on, like a disk icon, files on desktop icons, etc. How do I do that? Thanks, -wes ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo

Re: [CentOS] Top posting or not/ no snipping : was rsyslog.conf

What’s even more irritating to me than top posting is when someone replies to a message that takes two page scrolls to get to the bottom then there’s only a few words that are unrelated to the actual message! What’s worse, top posting or no snipping? -wes _

[CentOS] Percent bar on screen - for 2 seconds

Every once in awhile I see this horizontal percent bar flash up on the screen then disappear. What is that? CentOS 7.1,  kde. -wes ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Percent bar on screen - for 2 seconds

> On Aug 7, 2015, at 7:12 PM, Marko Vojinovic wrote: > > On Sat, 08 Aug 2015 00:07:35 + (GMT) > Wes James wrote: > >> Every once in awhile I see this horizontal percent bar flash up on >> the screen then disappear. What is that? >> >> CentOS 7.1,

Re: [CentOS] Percent bar on screen - for 2 seconds

> On Aug 7, 2015, at 7:12 PM, Marko Vojinovic wrote: > > On Sat, 08 Aug 2015 00:07:35 + (GMT) > Wes James wrote: > >> Every once in awhile I see this horizontal percent bar flash up on >> the screen then disappear. What is that? >> >> CentOS 7.1,

Re: [CentOS] Percent bar on screen - for 2 seconds

In Settings/Energy Saving there is a Dim Display option that was checked to happen after 25 minutes. I deselected that. I’ll see what happens now…. This seems to have done the job.  -wes ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos

[CentOS] updates from last Saturday

I yum updated last Saturday. It had a new kernel. I hadn't rebooted but saw that firefox update today and did that then rebooted. My system wouldn't boot all the way with the new kernel. I went back to 3.10.0-229.7.2.el7.x86_64 and my system would boot. When I boot with the 3.10.0-229.11.

[CentOS] dd iso to flash drive

I’ve been trying to get the dd of an iso to a usb flash drive to work for CentOS 6.7. It is working with the CentOS 7 DVD1 iso (x64), but if I use the same process with 6.7 bin dvd1 iso or the 6.7 live dvd, the flash drive will not boot. I thought 6.x and forward could be done like this. -wes

[CentOS] latest yum update messed up chrome

I yum updated yesterday and it updated chrome from 44.x to 45.x. It runs but it has errors going to web pages and won't load its own settings/extension pages either. I ran chrome from the command-line and see these errors: $ google-chrome libGL error: dlopen /usr/lib/dri/swrast_dri.so failed

[CentOS] why I use chrome on CentOS

I use chrome on CentOS because I wrote a web socket web app and I can only get chrome to work properly with web sockets. I have a local web app created with erlang. It works like ms sccm to wake, freeze/thaw deepfreeze PCs and can update windows/mac/linux boxes when they need updates for some

Re: [CentOS] latest yum update messed up chrome

> On Sep 2, 2015, at 1:10 PM, Johan Vermeulen > wrote: > > > Op 2-sep.-2015 20:59 schreef Wes James : >> >> I yum updated yesterday and it updated chrome from 44.x to 45.x. >> >> It runs but it has errors going to web pages and won't load its

Re: [CentOS] why I use chrome on CentOS

> On Sep 2, 2015, at 1:36 PM, zep wrote: > > > > On 09/02/2015 03:12 PM, Wes James wrote: >> I use chrome on CentOS because I wrote a web socket web app and I can only >> get chrome to work properly with web sockets. >> >> I have a local web app crea

Re: [CentOS] latest yum update messed up chrome

t;>> >>>> Op 2-sep.-2015 20:59 schreef Wes James : >>>>> >>>>> I yum updated yesterday and it updated chrome from 44.x to 45.x. >>>>> >>>>> It runs but it has errors going to web pages and won't load its own &g

Re: [CentOS] latest yum update messed up chrome

> On Sep 4, 2015, at 9:59 PM, Wes James wrote: >> As most google-chrome users probably already know, the latest SELinux >> updates have fixed the issue, and google-chrome once again runs with >> SELinux at enforcing. >> > > Thanks for the info. Now I nee

Re: [CentOS] centos 7 and keychain

> On Nov 17, 2015, at 11:27 AM, Pete Stieber wrote: > > Is there a centos recommended repository for centos 7 where I can obtain the > keychain package? > > TIA, > Pete I can only see a version for centos 6: http://pkgs.repoforge.org/keychain/ You’ll ne

[CentOS] yum errors

I have inherited centos 6.3 and 6.2 vms in an esxi environment. When I do yum provides ntpd on the 6.3 box I get a lot of errors like: Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, presto Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile * base: mirror.unl.edu * extras: mirrors.cmich.edu * updates: mirror.steadfa

Re: [CentOS] yum errors

the /etc/yum.repos.d so far and that’s about it. > > I might suggest starting off with a 'yum clean all', then running your > query again. > OK Thanks. I try that. > > > On 11/20/2015 11:21 AM, Wes James wrote: >> I have inherited centos 6.3 and 6.2

Re: [CentOS] yum errors

h a 'yum clean all', then running your > query again. > > > > On 11/20/2015 11:21 AM, Wes James wrote: >> I have inherited centos 6.3 and 6.2 vms in an esxi environment. When I do >> >> yum provides ntpd >> >> on the 6.3 box I get a lot of

Re: [CentOS] yum errors

> On Nov 20, 2015, at 10:41 AM, Jim Perrin wrote: > > It should be looking at /6/ instead of a specific point release. We > (CentOS) do not provide updates for individual point releases. You are > several years behind in security and bug-fix updates. Once a specific > minor version is expired, i

Re: [CentOS] yum errors

h a 'yum clean all', then running your > query again. > > > > On 11/20/2015 11:21 AM, Wes James wrote: >> I have inherited centos 6.3 and 6.2 vms in an esxi environment. When I do >> >> yum provides ntpd >> >> on the 6.3 box I get a lot of

Re: [CentOS] SOT: MariaDB 5.5.x-MariaDB logs are not going to desired .log file

> On Nov 30, 2015, at 2:57 PM, reynie...@gmail.com wrote: > > Hi there, I know this is off-topic or semi off-topic but I really need some > help since I am stucked. > > I'm trying to redirect MariaDB logs to `/var/log/mysql/*.log` files as > shown below on the `/etc/my.cnf.d/server.cnf` file:

Re: [CentOS] SOT: MariaDB 5.5.x-MariaDB logs are not going to desired .log file

> On Nov 30, 2015, at 4:15 PM, reynie...@gmail.com wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 5:50 PM, Wes James wrote: > >> Does this help: >> >> >> http://dba.stackexchange.com/questions/98732/how-to-enable-queries-logs-in-mariadb >> < >> http://

Re: [CentOS] yum errors

> On Nov 20, 2015, at 11:55 AM, Wes James wrote: > >> >> On Nov 20, 2015, at 10:41 AM, Jim Perrin wrote: >> >> It should be looking at /6/ instead of a specific point release. We >> (CentOS) do not provide updates for individual point releases. You are >

Re: [CentOS] yum errors

> On Dec 7, 2015, at 8:03 PM, Wes James wrote: > > I finally just did yum update on this box (actually 6.3) and now it is 6.7. > During the update it created a CentOS-Base.repo.rpmnew file. I renamed my > current one and this one to just .repo and now I again get: >

Re: [CentOS] yum errors

> On Dec 7, 2015, at 8:23 PM, Wes James wrote: > > >> On Dec 7, 2015, at 8:03 PM, Wes James wrote: >> > > > >> I finally just did yum update on this box (actually 6.3) and now it is 6.7. >> During the update it created a CentOS-Base.repo.rpmn

Re: [CentOS] yum errors

> On Dec 7, 2015, at 8:37 PM, Wes James wrote: > >> >> On Dec 7, 2015, at 8:23 PM, Wes James > <mailto:compte...@me.com>> wrote: >> >> >>> On Dec 7, 2015, at 8:03 PM, Wes James wrote: >>> >> >> >>

Re: [CentOS] yum errors

> On Dec 7, 2015, at 10:02 PM, Jake Shipton wrote: > > Wes James wrote: >> >>> On Dec 7, 2015, at 8:37 PM, Wes James wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> On Dec 7, 2015, at 8:23 PM, Wes James >>> <mailto:compte...@me.com>

Re: [CentOS] yum errors

> On Dec 8, 2015, at 7:45 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > > On 12/07/2015 11:50 PM, Wes James wrote: >> >>> On Dec 7, 2015, at 10:02 PM, Jake Shipton wrote: >>> >>> Wes James wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Dec 7, 2015, at 8:37 PM, We

Re: [CentOS] yum errors

> On Dec 7, 2015, at 10:57 PM, Rob Kampen wrote: >> >> [base] >> name=CentOS-$releasever - Base >> #mirrorlist=http://mirrorlist.centos.org/?release=$releasever&arch=$basearch&repo=os&infra=$infra > finally something I can check for you > my 6.x machine does not have the trailing &infra=$infr

Re: [CentOS] yum errors

Another option I tried was service iptables stop just to see if there was a firewall rule causing an issue. But yum update still fails: yum update Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, presto Setting up Update Process Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile Could not retrieve mirrorlist http://m

Re: [CentOS] yum errors

> On Dec 8, 2015, at 9:03 AM, Tru Huynh wrote: > > Hi, > > > On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 08:24:34AM -0700, Wes James wrote: >> > > ... >> >> nslookup works: >> >> Non-authoritative answer: >> Name:mirrorlist.centos.org >

Re: [CentOS] yum errors

> On Dec 8, 2015, at 9:03 AM, Tru Huynh wrote: > > Hi, > > > On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 08:24:34AM -0700, Wes James wrote: >> > > ... >> >> nslookup works: >> >> Non-authoritative answer: >> Name:mirrorlist.centos.org >

Re: [CentOS] yum errors

> On Dec 8, 2015, at 9:03 AM, Tru Huynh wrote: > > Hi, > > > On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 08:24:34AM -0700, Wes James wrote: >> > > ... >> >> nslookup works: >> >> Non-authoritative answer: >> Name:mirrorlist.centos.org >

Re: [CentOS] yum errors

> On Dec 8, 2015, at 9:03 AM, Tru Huynh wrote: > > Hi, > > > On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 08:24:34AM -0700, Wes James wrote: >> > > ... >> >> nslookup works: >> >> Non-authoritative answer: >> Name:mirrorlist.centos.org >

Re: [CentOS] yum errors

> On Dec 8, 2015, at 9:21 AM, Richard > wrote: > > > >> Date: Tuesday, December 08, 2015 09:17:20 -0700 >> From: Wes James >> > > You wouldn't happen to have an entry for mirrorlist.centos.org in > your /etc/hosts file for some

Re: [CentOS] USB devices - libgphoto2 - PTP - hplip

> On Dec 10, 2015, at 1:37 AM, Michael H wrote: > > Hi, > Posting this again as it has been drowned. can anybody assist? > > > -- > > Hi All, > > I'm trying to disable USB storage devices in Centos7.1.1503. > I did a google

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7 (1511) is released

> On Dec 14, 2015, at 9:37 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > > See this announce mail here: > > https://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/2015-December/021518.html I just updated to 7.2 from 7.1. I did lsb_release -a and it says 7.2.1511. I haven’t rebooted yet, which items would run wi

[CentOS] boot order items

Just side note, when I boot with 7.2 now it has (Core) with Debugging before (Core) now. All the others are the other way around. Also, on my 2011 iMac, the 7.2 kernel won’t boot. I had to go back to the latest I had with 7.1. This has happened in the past, but some time later a newer kerne

Re: [CentOS] boot order items

> On Dec 14, 2015, at 5:02 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > > On 12/14/2015 05:53 PM, Wes James wrote: >> Just side note, when I boot with 7.2 now it has (Core) with Debugging before >> (Core) now. All the others are the other way around. >> > > Known issue, se

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7 (1511) is released

> On Dec 14, 2015, at 4:57 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > > On 12/14/2015 05:46 PM, Wes James wrote: >> >>> On Dec 14, 2015, at 9:37 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>> >>> See this announce mail here: >>> >>> https://lists.ce

[CentOS] does centos have this grub2 issue?

I saw this today: http://linux.slashdot.org/story/15/12/16/040223/0-day-grub2-authentication-bypass-hits-linux I installed a grub2 update in 7.2 yesterday. Did the update fix this? -wes ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.o

Re: [CentOS] does centos have this grub2 issue?

> On Dec 17, 2015, at 11:29 AM, Mike - st257 wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 1:19 PM, Wes James wrote: > >> I saw this today: >> >> >> http://linux.slashdot.org/story/15/12/16/040223/0-day-grub2-authentication-bypass-hits-linux >> >> I in

Re: [CentOS] Calibre installation fails on C7

> On Dec 22, 2015, at 8:06 PM, Fred Smith wrote: > > Attempting to install latest Calibre on Centos-7, getting: > typed in "calibre ssl install error” to google first hit: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/26615914/calibre-fails-to-install

Re: [CentOS] Calibre installation fails on C7

> On Dec 22, 2015, at 9:13 PM, Fred Smith wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 09:03:28PM -0700, Wes James wrote: >> >>> On Dec 22, 2015, at 8:06 PM, Fred Smith >>> wrote: >>> >>> Attempting to install latest Calibre on Centos-7, getting:

Re: [CentOS] Calibre installation fails on C7

> On Dec 22, 2015, at 9:13 PM, Fred Smith wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 09:03:28PM -0700, Wes James wrote: >> >>> On Dec 22, 2015, at 8:06 PM, Fred Smith >>> wrote: >>> >>> Attempting to install latest Calibre on Centos-7, getting:

Re: [CentOS] Calibre installation fails on C7

> On Dec 22, 2015, at 9:13 PM, Fred Smith wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 09:03:28PM -0700, Wes James wrote: >> >>> On Dec 22, 2015, at 8:06 PM, Fred Smith >>> wrote: >>> >>> Attempting to install latest Calibre on Centos-7, getting:

Re: [CentOS] Calibre installation fails on C7

> On Dec 23, 2015, at 7:16 PM, Fred Smith wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 03:34:56PM -0700, Wes James wrote: >> >>> On Dec 22, 2015, at 9:13 PM, Fred Smith >>> wrote: >>> >>> On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 09:03:28PM -0700, Wes James wrote:

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7, 327 kernel still crashing

> On Jan 27, 2016, at 1:47 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > > I've just added the following to the CentOS bugtracker for CentOS-7 > 0009860. I admit to not being sure if it's the same issue, or a separate > one, but this and other Dell servers - I *think* they're all R420's, but I > could be wrong,

[CentOS] Utility to zero unused blocks on disk

Is there a utility to zero unused blocks on a disk? CentOS 6.7/Ext4 I saw zerofree, but I’m not sure it would work on Ext4 or even work on this version of CentOS. thanks, -wes ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman

Re: [CentOS] Utility to zero unused blocks on disk

to > running out of disk space for a moment). > > fix-it-with-a-hammer-digimer > Looks like it’s working. Thanks. > On 08/02/16 04:34 PM, Wes James wrote: >> Is there a utility to zero unused blocks on a disk? >> >> CentOS 6.7/Ext4 >> >> I saw zerofr

[CentOS] resize lvm

I have a laptop that I put centos 7 on and I started out with a 30gig partition.  I resized the other part of the disk to allow more space for centos.  I then created an unformated partition in the available space,  ran pvcreate /dev/sda4 vgextend lvname /dev/sda4 lvextend -L 184.46G /de

Re: [CentOS] resize lvm

On May 06, 2016, at 12:29 PM, John R Pierce wrote: On 5/6/2016 11:19 AM, Wes James wrote: sudo resize2fs /dev/lvname/root I get: resize2fs: Bad magic number in super-block while trying to open /dev/lvname/root Couldn't find valid filesystem superblock. what file system ty

Re: [CentOS] resize lvm

On May 06, 2016, at 12:37 PM, John R Pierce wrote: On 5/6/2016 11:28 AM, John R Pierce wrote: On 5/6/2016 11:19 AM, Wes James wrote: sudo resize2fs /dev/lvname/root I get: resize2fs: Bad magic number in super-block while trying to open /dev/lvname/root Couldn't find

Re: [CentOS] resize lvm

> > From: Scott Robbins > Date: May 06, 2016 12:32:55 PM > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] resize lvm > > On Fri, May 06, 2016 at 06:19:35PM +, Wes James wrote: > > I have a laptop that I put centos 7 on and I started out with a 30gig partition.

Re: [CentOS] resize lvm

On Sat, May 7, 2016 at 7:57 AM, Robert Nichols wrote: > On 05/06/2016 02:15 PM, Wes James wrote: > >> I found this: >> >> # lvextend -l +100%FREE /dev/myvg/testlv >> >> doing a search. What's the difference between 100%VG and 100%FREE? >>

[CentOS] zimbra test

I wanted to test zimbra on centos 6 (I'm new to centos). While installing zimbra it said there was a conflict on port 25. So I found out that postfix is the default mta on centos. I then did sudo yum remove postfix and followed the prompts for removing it, but in doing so it removed chrome that

[CentOS] removed items from removing postfix

Here are the items removed when removing postfix: Nov 1 09:56:59 localhost yum[22042]: Erased: google-chrome-stable Nov 1 09:57:00 localhost yum[22042]: Erased: redhat-lsb-compat Nov 1 09:57:00 localhost yum[22042]: Erased: redhat-lsb Nov 1 09:57:01 localhost yum[22042]: Erased: redhat-lsb-gra

Re: [CentOS] removed items from removing postfix

On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 10:37 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: > > Am 01.11.2013 17:33, schrieb Wes James: > > Here are the items removed when removing postfix: > > > > > > > Seems odd to me that those items would need to be removed just because > > postfix is

Re: [CentOS] zimbra test

On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 10:40 AM, Bart Schaefer wrote: > On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 9:21 AM, Wes James wrote: > > Why does > > removing postfix remove these others. cron and the others are dependent > on > > having postfix? Seems odd if they are. > > They are dependent

Re: [CentOS] zimbra test

On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 10:58 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > Am 01.11.2013 17:46, schrieb Wes James: > > On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 10:40 AM, Bart Schaefer < > barton.schae...@gmail.com>wrote: > > > >> On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 9:21 AM, Wes James wrote: > >&g

Re: [CentOS] zimbra test

On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 10:58 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: > > why trial and error? > chkconfig postfix off > > are you really have services uncontrolled running > instead explicit dsiable or enable them? > > chkconfig --list and disable anything you are not using > if it comes to servers connected

[CentOS] starting/stopping services

In an earlier thread it was mentioned I could use postfix stop to stop postfix. I'm trying to get sshd started and starting on boot. I did chkconfig sshd on and that worked fine, but then tried sshd start, but that didn't work. It looks like I need to do service sshd start (I did just that and i

Re: [CentOS] starting/stopping services

On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 1:33 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: > On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 2:18 PM, Wes James wrote: > > In an earlier thread it was mentioned I could use postfix stop to stop > > postfix. I'm trying to get sshd started and starting on boot. I did > > chkconfig ss

Re: [CentOS] starting/stopping services

On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 1:56 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > Am 01.11.2013 20:49, schrieb Wes James: > > > > > > > Thanks. But why do some commands require service service-name command > > (like sshd) where postfix works without the service command in

Re: [CentOS] starting/stopping services

On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 2:17 PM, John R. Dennison wrote: > On Fri, Nov 01, 2013 at 02:02:40PM -0600, Wes James wrote: > > Please be careful with follow-ups. You are including Reindl in your > replies and quoting his material back to the list when you do. He is > not a member o

[CentOS] read-only file system when trying to save files

I have installed emacs with yum and now I'm trying to create a .emacs file and put some commands in it, but I can't type anything in the emacs buffer. It says the buffer is read-only. I exited emacs and did touch .emacs and I get a message that it can't do that on a read-only file system. I goog

Re: [CentOS] read-only file system when trying to save files

gt; On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 5:36 PM, Wes James wrote: > > > I have installed emacs with yum and now I'm trying to create a .emacs > file > > and put some commands in it, but I can't type anything in the emacs > > buffer. It says the buffer is read-only. I exited e

Re: [CentOS] read-only file system when trying to save files

On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 4:53 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > Am 01.11.2013 23:51, schrieb Wes James: > > That was it. This is an old mac pro that I put centos on yesterday. It > > had 4 disks in it and this is the 3rd that has died. A faculty member > had > > it fo

[CentOS] 3TB disk with 6.0.4 not booting

As you know I've been testing centos on an old mac pro. I have 1 disk left of 4 that I'm testing on. I had a 3TB disk and stuck it in and couldn't get centos to boot off of it. It would install, but not boot. I then got "old" disk 4 installed with it. Any idea why the 3TB disk doesn't work? I

Re: [CentOS] 3TB disk with 6.0.4 not booting

On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 5:14 PM, James A. Peltier wrote: > - Original Message - > | As you know I've been testing centos on an old mac pro. I have 1 > | disk left > | of 4 that I'm testing on. I had a 3TB disk and stuck it in and > | couldn't > | get centos to boot off of it. It would i

Re: [CentOS] 3TB disk with 6.0.4 not booting

On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 9:19 PM, Keith Keller < kkel...@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us> wrote: > On 2013-11-05, Wes James wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 5:14 PM, James A. Peltier > wrote: > >> > >> To boot off of a 3TB disk you require a (U)EFI capable machin

[CentOS] /etc/inittab

I noticed in /etc/inittab that it has this line: # 0 - halt (Do NOT set initdefault to this) It makes sense, but what if it did get set to 0 or 6? Is there a way to boot to single-user mode anyway to edit the file and change it to a correct value? What if it is set to a negative number or a v

[CentOS] echo 0> /selinux/enforce

When does echo 0 > /selinux/inforce need to be used? I.e., where is selinux enforcing itself on the system to protect it? When I do yum install of some package, it seems to work (not being blocked). When would doing something not work because selinux is watching it (or whatever that process is d

Re: [CentOS] /etc/inittab

On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 3:24 PM, Warren Young wrote: > On 11/5/2013 15:10, Wes James wrote: > > I noticed in /etc/inittab that it has this line: > > > > # 0 - halt (Do NOT set initdefault to this) > > > > It makes sense, but what if it did get set to 0 or

Re: [CentOS] echo 0> /selinux/enforce

On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 3:28 PM, John R Pierce wrote: > On 11/5/2013 2:15 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > > Wes James wrote: > >> >When does echo 0 > /selinux/inforce need to be used? I.e., where is > >> >selinux enforcing itself on the system to protect it?

Re: [CentOS] echo 0> /selinux/enforce

On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 3:38 PM, wrote: > John R Pierce wrote: > > On 11/5/2013 2:15 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > >> Wes James wrote: > >>> >When does echo 0 > /selinux/inforce need to be used? I.e., where is > >>> >selinux enforcing

Re: [CentOS] echo 0> /selinux/enforce

On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 3:53 PM, wrote: > Wes James wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 3:38 PM, wrote: > > > > >> > >> mark "NOT a fan of selinux, dealt with it far too much" > >> > > OK. Why not use some other linux that d

Re: [CentOS] echo 0> /selinux/enforce

On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 4:01 PM, Keith Keller < kkel...@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us> wrote: > On 2013-11-05, Wes James wrote: > > > > Why not use some other linux that doesn't use selinux then? > > If it were harder to disable (either temporarily or permanently) t

[CentOS] iptables

I ran: iptables -L and see this: Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT) target prot opt source destination ACCEPT all -- anywhere anywherestate RELATED,ESTABLISHED ACCEPT icmp -- anywhere anywhere ACCEPT all -- anywhere anyw

Re: [CentOS] iptables

On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 5:22 PM, John R Pierce wrote: > On 11/5/2013 3:55 PM, Wes James wrote: > > I ran: > > > > iptables -L > > incomplete output. try... > > iptables -L -vn > > and you'll probably see that reject is for a specific packet type.

Re: [CentOS] echo 0> /selinux/enforce

On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 11:35 PM, Phil Gardner wrote: > > > On 11/05/2013 06:13 PM, Wes James wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 4:01 PM, Keith Keller < > > kkel...@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us> wrote: > > > >> On 2013-11-05, Wes James wrote: > >>&g

Re: [CentOS] Provide access to /home folder

On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 11:38 PM, Gopu Krishnan wrote: > When I set the setfacl, wordpress sites are giving 500 internal server > error. > I am planning to set a user 'developer' with the home directory as '/home' > Inside the /home directory, each site is having its own ownership. For > example, /

[CentOS] virtualbox, lvextend, etc.

I'm using virtualbox with one of the tests I have for centos 6.4. I realized after creating the disk, the default was too small. I added more disk space with: VBoxManage modifyhd /Users/user/VirtualBox\ VMs/centos\ 6.x/centos\ 6.x.vdi --resize 25000 I then used this site to help me resize the

Re: [CentOS] virtualbox, lvextend, etc.

On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 9:48 PM, Barry Brimer wrote: > > but when I do: > > > > df -h > > > > I still see only the original 8gig disk (8gig total - 4gig data/4gig > swap)). > > I see this extending the logical volume, but not the filesystem on the > logical volume. You can use resize2fs to do t

Re: [CentOS] virtualbox, lvextend, etc.

On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 7:28 AM, SilverTip257 wrote: > On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 11:48 PM, Barry Brimer wrote: > > > > but when I do: > > > > > > df -h > > > > > > I still see only the original 8gig disk (8gig total - 4gig data/4gig > > swap)). > > > > I see this extending the logical volume, but n

Re: [CentOS] virtualbox, lvextend, etc.

On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 9:48 PM, Barry Brimer wrote: > > but when I do: > > > > df -h > > > > I still see only the original 8gig disk (8gig total - 4gig data/4gig > swap)). > > I see this extending the logical volume, but not the filesystem on the > logical volume. You can use resize2fs to do t

  1   2   >