Re: [CentOS] Ping as regular user not allowed (CentOS Stream 8)

On 1/19/22 08:44, Brian Stinson wrote: On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 8:33 AM Toralf Lund wrote: Following some update or the other (I think) on my CentOS Stream 8 system, I'm no longer able to use ping as a regular user; I get $ ping www.centos.org ping: socket: Operation not permitted Does anyone

Re: [CentOS] Ping as regular user not allowed (CentOS Stream 8)

On 1/20/22 12:46, Johnny Hughes wrote: On 1/19/22 08:44, Brian Stinson wrote: On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 8:33 AM Toralf Lund wrote: Following some update or the other (I think) on my CentOS Stream 8 system, I'm no longer able to use ping as a regular user; I get $ ping www.centos.org

Re: [CentOS] Ping as regular user not allowed (CentOS Stream 8)

On 1/20/22 15:07, Johnny Hughes wrote: On 1/20/22 12:46, Johnny Hughes wrote: On 1/19/22 08:44, Brian Stinson wrote: On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 8:33 AM Toralf Lund wrote: Following some update or the other (I think) on my CentOS Stream 8 system, I'm no longer able to use ping as a regular

Re: [CentOS] Ping as regular user not allowed (CentOS Stream 8)

On 1/21/22 05:01, Leon Fauster via CentOS wrote: Am 20.01.22 um 23:14 schrieb Johnny Hughes: On 1/20/22 15:07, Johnny Hughes wrote: On 1/20/22 12:46, Johnny Hughes wrote: On 1/19/22 08:44, Brian Stinson wrote: On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 8:33 AM Toralf Lund wrote: Following some update or the

Re: [CentOS] Ping as regular user not allowed (CentOS Stream 8)

On 1/21/22 07:17, Johnny Hughes wrote: On 1/21/22 05:01, Leon Fauster via CentOS wrote: Am 20.01.22 um 23:14 schrieb Johnny Hughes: On 1/20/22 15:07, Johnny Hughes wrote: On 1/20/22 12:46, Johnny Hughes wrote: On 1/19/22 08:44, Brian Stinson wrote: On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 8:33 AM Toralf Lund

Re: [CentOS] Ping as regular user not allowed (CentOS Stream 8)

On 1/21/22 07:53, Johnny Hughes wrote: On 1/21/22 07:17, Johnny Hughes wrote: On 1/21/22 05:01, Leon Fauster via CentOS wrote: Am 20.01.22 um 23:14 schrieb Johnny Hughes: On 1/20/22 15:07, Johnny Hughes wrote: On 1/20/22 12:46, Johnny Hughes wrote: On 1/19/22 08:44, Brian Stinson wrote: On

Re: [CentOS] Ping as regular user not allowed (CentOS Stream 8)

On 1/21/22 08:23, Johnny Hughes wrote: On 1/21/22 07:53, Johnny Hughes wrote: On 1/21/22 07:17, Johnny Hughes wrote: On 1/21/22 05:01, Leon Fauster via CentOS wrote: Am 20.01.22 um 23:14 schrieb Johnny Hughes: On 1/20/22 15:07, Johnny Hughes wrote: On 1/20/22 12:46, Johnny Hughes wrote: On

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7 polkit update

com/errata/RHSA-2022:0274 That has been pushed to the master server and is syncing to the mirror network. It will be announce shortly. I am also currently testing a CentOS Stream 8 release with the el8 version in it as well. That will be pushed as soon as it passes QA testing. T

Re: [CentOS] [CentOS Stream 8] Update of IPA server broken - bind-dyndb-ldap needs to be rebuilt?

On 2/9/22 01:01, Mathieu Baudier wrote: Hello, We are testing an IPA/IDM infrastructure which is a mix of RHEL 8 and CentOS Stream 8 environments. The configuration has been completed since last summer, and it is working fine between updates. Currently, the CentOS Stream 8 IPA servers cannot up

Re: [CentOS] [CentOS Stream 8] Update of IPA server broken - bind-dyndb-ldap needs to be rebuilt?

On 2/9/22 11:24, Paul Heinlein wrote: On Wed, 9 Feb 2022, Johnny Hughes wrote: Caused by a rebase of bind, but the new idm:DL1 module lagged behind a little bit.  Was fixed with the push about 9 hours ago. Johnny, I see idm:DL1 (and idm:client) in Stream 9, but not Stream 8. I just

Re: [CentOS] possible issue with CS8 kernel-4.18.0-358.el8.x86_64

On 2/22/22 21:41, Mark LaPierre wrote: On 1/30/22 23:06, Orion Poplawski wrote: On 1/28/22 10:27, Turing Eret wrote: I'd like to echo this. `kscreenlocker_greet` doesn't show a password prompt and can't be unlocked, `loginctl unlock-session` just doesn't work, sddm just stops at a black screen

Re: [CentOS] possible issue with CS8 kernel-4.18.0-358.el8.x86_64

On 2/23/22 08:40, Johnny Hughes wrote: On 2/22/22 21:41, Mark LaPierre wrote: On 1/30/22 23:06, Orion Poplawski wrote: On 1/28/22 10:27, Turing Eret wrote: I'd like to echo this. `kscreenlocker_greet` doesn't show a password prompt and can't be unlocked, `loginctl unlock-sessio

Re: [CentOS] mock gimmicks - experts?

On 2/28/22 08:49, lejeczek via CentOS wrote: Hi guys. I'm trying something I believe is trivial, on centOS 9 with mock version 2.16 -> $ mock -r centos-stream-8-x86_64 --rootdir=~/mock --localrepo=/00.STORAGE/1/var/www/repos --continue --chain ./mpfr-4.1.0-7.el9.src.rpm ./libmpc-1.2.1-4.el9

Re: [CentOS] mock gimmicks - experts?

On 3/1/22 06:02, lejeczek via CentOS wrote: On 28/02/2022 21:48, Johnny Hughes wrote: On 2/28/22 08:49, lejeczek via CentOS wrote: Hi guys. I'm trying something I believe is trivial, on centOS 9 with mock version 2.16 -> $ mock -r centos-stream-8-x86_64 --rootdir=~/mock --local

Re: [CentOS] Autoreply: "CentOS Digest, Vol 206, Issue 9"

On 3/10/22 06:00, m...@jump.com.hk wrote: Thank you for your email. Vincent Mak is no longer working at Jump. Please do not hesitate to contact saman...@jump.com.hk or g...@jump.com.hk with any enquiry you have. Sorry fort he noise .. hopefully I have fixed this now.

Re: [CentOS] Updating a package to one from a different repository

On 3/21/22 09:32, Kenneth Porter wrote: At some point I updated fail2ban from a copr repo to get the latest release. That repo no longer exists but a newer version is available in EPEL. Is there a direct way to get yum to update using the different repo? Or do I need to save my config and DB, e

Re: [CentOS] Where can I find more information on the recent update to the 4.18.0-373 kernel

On 4/20/22 16:16, Kay Schenk wrote: Hi Joshua, and list... I got the non-workng sound driver for Intel HDA fixed with my kernel 4.18.0-373. After removing the extra kernel flag i915_alpha from my command line (see instructions when this module really was alpha -- https://access.redhat.com/d

Re: [CentOS] Where can I find more information on the recent update to the 4.18.0-373 kernel

On 4/22/22 16:57, Kay Schenk wrote: more info...and GADS! my kernel line change to kernel 4.18.0-373 is NOT THERE today! I did NOT use my former way of making this change permanent and well, the offending i915_alpha was back in play today mucking things up. So, a question...is this page for

Re: [CentOS] Where can I find more information on the recent update to the 4.18.0-373 kernel

://www.golinuxcloud.com/update-grub2-grubby-grub2-editenv-rhel-8/ that grub2-mkconfig which I find easier has some issues ... 🙁 I'll try again. Thanks. grubby runs on a new kernel install .. so, maybe use that method so whatever grubby uses as default will be updated? On 4/23/22 08:02, Johnny H

Re: [CentOS] CentOS7 latest kernel still does not run KVM guests

On 12/20/22 06:50, Bill Gee wrote: The two latest kernels for CentOS7 are complete fails for running KVM and QEMU guest machines. Version 3.10.0-1160.76.1 works correctly.  Both 3.10.0-1160.80.1 and 3.10.0-1160.81.1 will hang within seconds of launching any virtual machine.  It is a HARD hang

Re: [CentOS] CentOS7 latest kernel still does not run KVM guests

On 12/20/22 07:25, Johnny Hughes wrote: On 12/20/22 06:50, Bill Gee wrote: The two latest kernels for CentOS7 are complete fails for running KVM and QEMU guest machines. Version 3.10.0-1160.76.1 works correctly.  Both 3.10.0-1160.80.1 and 3.10.0-1160.81.1 will hang within seconds of

Re: [CentOS] centos 8-Streams kernel?

On 1/7/23 13:41, Aleksandar Ivanisevic wrote: Heh, Your sentiments on the website very much mirror my own, although I’m more focused on server applications rather than on desktop (we use Macs and Ubuntu for that). When Red Hat announced Streams, I was terrified at first and my first instinct

Re: [CentOS] dnf-makecache.service failing every few days and dnf-automatic.service samba freeipa issues (again).

On 1/9/23 10:16, Jelle de Jong wrote: Hello everybody, What is the status of the freeipa/sssd and samba conflicts in the repositories? I can not wrap my mind around that two big packages are not getting security updates anymore, because they are conflicting. I will go to FOSDEM in Belgium t

Re: [CentOS] dnf-makecache.service failing every few days and dnf-automatic.service samba freeipa issues (again).

On 1/19/23 14:38, Jelle de Jong wrote: On 1/9/23 19:06, Johnny Hughes wrote: On 1/9/23 10:16, Jelle de Jong wrote: Hello everybody, What is the status of the freeipa/sssd and samba conflicts in the repositories? I can not wrap my mind around that two big packages are not getting

Re: [CentOS] thunderbird-102.7.1-1.el8 breaks OAuth authentication

On 2/15/23 09:26, Orion Poplawski wrote: On 2/14/23 08:49, Orion Poplawski wrote: On 1/29/23 11:24, Orion Poplawski wrote: It seems that thunderbird-102.7.1-1.el8 (at least on CentOS Stream) broke OAuth authentication with outlook.office365.com.  Downgrading to 102.4.0-1.el8 resolved the issue.

Re: [CentOS] tzdata 2022g package was rebuilt ?

On 4/4/23 08:39, Iain Barker via CentOS wrote: Previously the packages were built 6 Dec 2022 published 13 Dec 2022. Now the download packages are rebuilt 30 Mar 2023 published 03 Apr 2023. http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/updates/x86_64/Packages/tzdata-2022g-1.el7.noarch.rpm http://mirror.cent

[CentOS] CentOS Enterprise IPA (Identity, Policy, and Audit) Server

/view.php?id=3880 Thanks, Johnny Hughes signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] CentOS Enterprise IPA (Identity, Policy, and Audit) Server

On 09/30/2009 07:43 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > I have just completed building the RPMS for the CentOS Enterprise IPA > (Identity, Policy, and Audit) Server. > > This is based on the sources from the Red Hat Enterprise IPA server. > > Documentation can be download

Re: [CentOS] OT: What's wrong with RAID5

On 09/24/2009 07:35 AM, Rainer Duffner wrote: > > Am 24.09.2009 um 07:43 schrieb Fajar Priyanto: > >> Hi all, >> Sorry for the OT. >> I've got an IBM N3300-A10 NAS. It runs Data Ontap 7.2.5.1. >> The problem is, from the docs it says that it only supports either >> RAID-DP or RAID4. >> What I wan

Re: [CentOS] CentOS Enterprise IPA (Identity, Policy, and Audit) Server

On 10/01/2009 07:22 AM, Miguel Di Ciurcio Filho wrote: > Johnny Hughes wrote: >> >> I forgot to mention that the CentOS Directory Server is already part of >> the regular CentOS Extras repository, and should install from there as a >> dependency for CentOS EIPA >>

Re: [CentOS] CentOS Enterprise IPA (Identity, Policy, and Audit) Server

On 10/02/2009 05:06 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: > Johnny Hughes wrote: >> On 09/30/2009 07:43 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>> I have just completed building the RPMS for the CentOS Enterprise IPA >>> (Identity, Policy, and Audit) Server. >>> >>> This is bas

Re: [CentOS] GnuPG for CentOS 5.3?

on that will compile on gtk-2.10.x and use Karanbir's SRPM as a template if a newer version is available that will work. Thanks, Johnny Hughes signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] GnuPG for CentOS 5.3?

On 10/04/2009 08:50 AM, lostson wrote: > > On Sun, 2009-10-04 at 08:24 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> On 10/03/2009 10:08 PM, Lanny Marcus wrote: >>> On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 5:56 PM, Lanny Marcus >>> wrote: >>> >>>>>> Dick: I u

Re: [CentOS] GnuPG for CentOS 5.3?

On 10/04/2009 09:04 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 10/04/2009 08:50 AM, lostson wrote: >> >> On Sun, 2009-10-04 at 08:24 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>> On 10/03/2009 10:08 PM, Lanny Marcus wrote: >>>> On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 5:56 PM, Lanny Marcus >>>

Re: [CentOS] GnuPG for CentOS 5.3?

On 10/04/2009 12:22 PM, Lanny Marcus wrote: > On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 11:27 AM, Lanny Marcus > wrote: >> On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 10:21 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> >>>>>>>>> If you are using Gnome, you may want to check out seahorse. Very easy >&

Re: [CentOS] GnuPG for CentOS 5.3?

On 10/04/2009 04:59 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 10/04/2009 12:22 PM, Lanny Marcus wrote: >> On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 11:27 AM, Lanny Marcus >> wrote: >>> On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 10:21 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>> >>>>>>>>>> I

Re: [CentOS] GnuPG for CentOS 5.3?

On 10/04/2009 05:05 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 10/04/2009 04:59 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> On 10/04/2009 12:22 PM, Lanny Marcus wrote: >>> On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 11:27 AM, Lanny Marcus >>> wrote: >>>> On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 10:21 AM, Johnny Hughes wr

Re: [CentOS] GnuPG for CentOS 5.3?

On 10/04/2009 07:50 PM, Lanny Marcus wrote: > On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 7:43 PM, Lanny Marcus wrote: >> On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 6:44 PM, Johnny Hughes >> >>>> However, I have not tested them, so have no idea if they work. >>> OK, the i386 and x86_64 RPMs are now a

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.4? anyone? - "debate"

On 10/16/2009 05:25 AM, Rainer Duffner wrote: > Niki Kovacs schrieb: >> Les Mikesell a écrit : >> >> >>> I think for a lot of us, the 'we'll release when it's ready' mentality >>> is the main reason we aren't using debian. I don't think CentOS should >>> repeat their mistakes. >>> >>> >>

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.4? anyone?

On 10/15/2009 07:12 AM, Mathew S. McCarrell wrote: > On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 7:45 AM, mbneto > wrote: > > Hi, > > The last status (from twitter) is 2 days old with the '5.4 is baked! > centos internal network will start syncing up today. Release ~ > soon!

Re: [CentOS] Wherefore is FUSE?

Benjamin Smith wrote: Tonight, I tried to roll out fuse on my CentOS 4 production system. (in order to use GlusterFS) I have two identical servers, and one took, the other didn't. How simple could this be? # yum install yum-plugin-priorities # yum install rpmforge-release # yum install fus

Re: [CentOS] Centos issues

more as it is just a point in time copy of the bigger tree. If you insist on doing it anyway, it should work if you do this: yum --disablerepo=* --enablerepo=c5-media install substitute the packages you want to install for Thanks, Johnny Hughes signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital

Re: [CentOS] clamav update broken?

o get it from, and either use priorities to give that repo priority over the other 3rd party repos ... OR use "exclude=clamav*" in the .repo file (in the applicable sections) to exclude those RPMS from the repo you don't want to get them from. Thanks, Johnny Hughes signa

Re: [CentOS] Centosplus kernel does not have framebuffer support?

ary? As far as I know, centosplus kernels are released only when the distro kernel is updated. However, only Johnny Hughes or CentOS devs can give you an "official" answer to your question. Johnny, where are you? Wake up :-D Sorry, I have been busy with trying to rol

Re: [CentOS] What is wrong with yum?

Olaf Mueller wrote: Hello, in my CentOS-Base.repo file there is a line baseurl=http://mirror.centos.org/centos/$releasever/updates/$basearch and yum update said 'nothing to do'. Then I change this line to baseurl=http://mirror.centos.org/centos/5.1/updates/i386 and yum updates firefox, squid, so

Re: [CentOS] GUI

en is that you need to install the CentOS version of libpng from our updates repository which contains /usr/lib/libpng12.so.0 and it has all the right things for the other GUI apps. I have no idea how you installed zenoss or if it needs a custom libpng library, but the one you have installed i

Re: [CentOS] vncviewer

elect alt or ctrl with a check mark. Shift-F10 seems to pass through OK for me using the CentOS-5 VNC Viewer without any problems though and not need any help. Thanks, Johnny Hughes signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS ma

[CentOS] CentOS Forums

we have anyone out there who likes the forum format for tech support, is fairly knowledgeable and would like to help out, we would greatly appreciate help in our CentOS Forums. Thanks, Johnny Hughes signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [CentOS] Missing update / update announcement

So, we should push it soon. Thanks, Johnny Hughes signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] How to handle updates after rebuilding PHP?

system when it builds). Here is an example of how to build as a non root user: http://www.owlriver.com/tips/non-root/ Thanks, Johnny Hughes signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] broken GFS

then you can manually update the kernels and kmods together separately. Thanks, Johnny Hughes signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] broken GFS

I have a real job and a real life ... if you can't do one of these: 1. Build your own module. 2. Exclude the kernel and only update it when the modules are ready. Then you can pay me $200.00 per hour and I will manage your server for you. Thanks, Joh

Re: [CentOS] broken GFS

et updates ... however they are not normally going to be as fast as the Base and Updates repos. That is just how it goes. Thanks, Johnny Hughes signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] broken GFS

Doug Tucker wrote: This is linked from the CentOS FAQ: http://www.caliburn.nl/topposting.html Akemi LOL! This is just TOO good. 1. Because it is proper Usenet Etiquette. ...all but dead...I run a usenet server here, had 3 logins last month...user base is over 4000... 2.We use a good

Re: [CentOS] ntpd date sync before service startup

David Hláčik wrote: Hello, in system-config-date i have checkbox synchronize date before service startup. Which config switch,file does it affect? I want to turn it on on my CentOS machine without xauth , just editing config files , i was hoping it could be in /etc/sysconfig/ntpd but no. ok ...

Re: [CentOS] OT: Top Posting

different users prefer different methods. That is what open source is all about ... pick the method you like and use it :D Thanks, Johnny Hughes signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-DS

wondering if maybe it was preferable to Fedora-ds at this point. it is a rebuild of rhds 8.0 ... it seems to work as well as that does from all the testing I have done. However, if I were you, I would look at freeipa: http://freeipa.org/ Thanks, Johnny Hughes signature.asc Description: OpenPGP

Re: [CentOS] kernel-2.6.9-67.0.15.plus.c4.i586.rpm

I fixed that patch. Thanks, Johnny Hughes signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] clustered mail server?

use the Primary-Primary setup. But there are much better ways (IMHO) to achieve Primary-Primary effect with other clustering technologies like LVS or RHCS/RHGFS. Thanks, Johnny Hughes signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS

Re: [CentOS] Re: [CentOS-announce] Impact of the Debian OpenSSL vulnerability

Les Mikesell wrote: Ralph Angenendt wrote: - What does our upstream think about this? - What do the OpenSSH developers think about this? Someone is going to need to ask those questions of the people... I don't think the OpenSSH devels really do care about that - there is no discussion whats

Re: [CentOS] kernel-2.6.18-53.1.21.el5 centosplus?

Matthew Kent wrote: Been a week, any eta? :) Thanks! We are currently using the builders to build centos-5.2 ... I can try to get the that kernel in, but we should very soon thereafter have the 5.2 one, so it might be better for you just to wait. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digit

Re: [CentOS] kernel-2.6.18-53.1.21.el5 centosplus?

Alfred von Campe wrote: On May 28, 2008, at 14:08, Johnny Hughes wrote: We are currently using the builders to build centos-5.2 ... I can try to get the that kernel in, but we should very soon thereafter have the 5.2 one, so it might be better for you just to wait. Does the 5.2 kernel

Re: [CentOS] 40 second delay on automounts with 2.6.18-53.1.21.el5 kernel

Joe Pruett wrote: On Tue, 27 May 2008, Joe Pruett wrote: so, has anyone seen ipsec get messed up with the latest kernel? i have verified that dropping back to the 53.1.19 kernel makes ipsec function again. with the new 5.2 kernel coming soon, i'm not sure if it makes sense to try and figur

Re: [CentOS] openafs kernel module

Markus Hetzenecker wrote: We start to use centos 5 for our workstation at our site (University Innsbruck) and we use openafs to hold the home directories. There would be a big advantage to have the openafs kernel module (and the additional rpms) in the centos extras (or addons) repository with an

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.2 ?

Stephen John Smoogen wrote: On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 9:11 AM, MHR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 2:41 AM, Ralph Angenendt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Answer: When it's ready. Suits me - I have a different question (and it's probably up somewhere I don't have time to look at t

Re: [CentOS] Re: centos on ebox

Jerry Geis wrote: On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 11:46:53AM -0400, Jerry Geis wrote: >/ />/ I am trying to install centos i386 on a ebox 2300 unit. /http://www.embeddedpc.net/eBox2300/tabid/110/Default.aspx ? you won't make it with only 128 MB of RAM... is the cpu i686 compatible? yes this is the

Re: [CentOS] Re: centos on ebox

Jerry Geis wrote: Jerry Geis wrote: >>/ />>/ On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 11:46:53AM -0400, Jerry Geis wrote: />>/ >/ />/ I am trying to install centos i386 on a ebox 2300 unit. />>/ /http://www.embeddedpc.net/eBox2300/tabid/110/Default.aspx ? />>/ />>/ you won't make it with only 128 MB of RAM... />

Re: [CentOS] Re: centos on ebox

Jerry Geis wrote: now do: i586 text mem=128 when I do "i586 text mem=128" it says cant find kernel so I do "linux i586 text mem=128" and I get the same behavior Loading vmlinuz Loading initrd and reboot. Am I not correctly specifying the kernel yet? Are you sure this is a CD-1

Re: [CentOS] Frequent Gnome Terminal crashes in CentOS 5.1

Alfred von Campe wrote: Ever since I upgraded all my systems to CentOS 5.1 I have been getting reports from users about "all their windows disappearing". A little digging revealed that they meant all gnome-terminal windows. Since there is only one gnome-terminal process by default for all you

Re: [CentOS] Setting up a chroot

MHR wrote: I'm trying to build GNOME (to run a more recent version than 2.16.* on CentOS 5.1) and I keep running into a lot of rather strange problems. I'm wondering if this might have something to do with my hybrid 64 and 32 bit general environment, so I want to try a pure 64-bit chroot. I've

Re: [CentOS] Re: 40 second delay on automounts with 2.6.18-53.1.21.el5 kernel

Scott Silva wrote: on 5-29-2008 12:42 PM Ned Slider spake the following: Joe Pruett wrote: On Thu, 29 May 2008, Johnny Hughes wrote: This is already solved on another thread ... but for closure on this one, there is a known bug here with that kernel and ipsec: http://bugs.centos.org

Re: [CentOS] Fastest 4.6 -> 5.1 upgrade path

Adrian Marsh wrote: Hi All, I've a question on upgrading Centos with the least downtime... The best way to accomoplish this is to backup all data and not upgrade the install at all. That is how Red Hat recommends that you do it for RHEL and how CentOS recommends it be done as well.

Re: [CentOS] Setting Group owner of files on USB drive

Robert Moskowitz wrote: Matt Hyclak wrote: On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 04:37:58PM -0400, Robert Moskowitz enlightened us: I just got a 8Gb flash drive and went to copy a bunch of files onto it. I wanted to perserve everything, so I just took my archiving rsync command and altered it to go to lo

Re: [CentOS] XFS install issue

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am attempting to implement XFS on a new system. System: Supermicro SC846 TQ-R900B - rack-mountable SUPERMICRO X7DWN+ - motherboard 3ware 9650SE-24M8 - storage controller 10 Hitachi DeskStar 7K1000 - hard drive - 1 TB 8GB Ram 2 Intel Quad-Core Xeon E5420 / 2.5 GHz proce

Re: [CentOS] drbd strategy

sbeam wrote: I have an existing in-production LAMP server running Centos 5.1. It uses physical partitions on top of hardware RAID1, having / /home /var and /boot on separate partitions. We have a near-identical system I am thinking of bringing in as a DRBD/Heartbeat companion. One solution ma

Re: [CentOS] drbd strategy

sbeam wrote: Thanks guys for the info. I understand that the secondary machine needs a /var too while in standby, and since it can't also mount it as part of the DRBD array, then it has to be a vanilla partition on both machines. Thanks for clearing that up. On Saturday 31 May 2008 09:28, Fil

Re: [CentOS] XFS install issue

Linux wrote: On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 1:16 PM, Johnny Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I also normally build all the extras kmods while I build the centosplus kernel, so they were also not yet done ... however I did go ahead and build I dont intend to blame anybody but kmod_xfs was a

Re: [CentOS] tzdata, Greenwich zone: URGENT!

ne you manually copied in. The UTC time zone is also available on install as a selection. Thanks, Johnny Hughes signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] INN Python support in Centos 5.1

Ralph Angenendt wrote: David Hlác(ik wrote: RPM build errors: File not found by glob: /var/tmp/inn-2.4.3-12-I31464/usr/lib/news/bin/filter/*.pyc File not found by glob: /var/tmp/inn-2.4.3-12-I31464/usr/lib/news/bin/filter/*.pyo [EMAIL PROTECTED] SPECS]# Take out *.pyc and *.pyo from th

Re: [CentOS] Live CD?

MHR wrote: I just used a Live CD for the first time today, in part to show what CentOS can do for a co-worker who is looking at using it at work and home, but I got the strangest result. We booted the CD and let the centos user log in. It took a really long time to load the desktop and there we

Re: [CentOS] request for procedure to rebuild distribution

Kevin C. Abbey wrote: Hi, Where can I find the automated procedure to rebuild the CentOS distribution? I'd like to optimize for the AMD barcelona. There is no automated procedure to rebuild the distro ... there is gentoo for that though. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signa

Re: [CentOS] General CentOS 5.1 (or Gnome) instability?

there may be APIC/ACPI issues that can effect kernel, udev, hald, etc. I have zero issues here ... but I do NOT use yum-updated or any of its applets. Thanks, Johnny Hughes signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] kernels and irc

disrespectful to our employees. You will instead have to be polite in your disagreements. If this is a problem, I suggest that you find a paid for service contract where you can be rude to the people with whom you interact. Thanks, Johnny Hughes signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital

Re: [CentOS] kernels and irc

James Bunnell wrote: On Thu, 2008-06-05 at 09:19 -0700, Ray Van Dolson wrote: i have a little familiarity with open source, perhaps more than noted, and i what i am seeing here is centos saying that since we're not paid, we dont care. i think there are many projects that would not want thi

Re: [CentOS] Re: kernel compile for i586

Jerry Geis wrote: nate wrote: >/ Jerry Geis wrote: />>/ I created a i586 install image with qemu. />>/ I downloaded the SRPMS package for the kernel and installed it. />>/ I cd /usr/src/redhat/SPECS />>/ rpmbuild -bp --target i586 kernelXXX.spec />>/ I does a bunch of things but it did not build

Re: [CentOS] Re: 3Ware 9690SA

Ruslan Sivak wrote: Scott Silva wrote: The ones on their standard download page are not compatible with Xen kernels according to the release notes. The ones to be used for Xen kernels on x64 is this one: http://w

Re: [CentOS] swdtp -sv?

es port 10009 will use that name. I don't have anything listening on that port, but you might. This command should give you more info: netstat -apn | grep 10009 Thanks, Johnny Hughes signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ C

Re: [CentOS] wpa_supplicant and machine freezes

Timothy Kesten wrote: Hi Folks, I'd like to install my USB-WLAN-Stick Netgear WG111v3. Ndiswrapper works correct after installing Kernel-Modules from atrpm ndiswrapper-kmdl-2.6.18-53.1.19.el5.centos.plus-1.52-16.el5.i686.rpm. But by calling wpa_supplicant with wpa_supplicant -i wlan0 -D wext

Re: [CentOS] Hardware Specs

Victor Padro wrote: Hello all! I was wondering if you can help me a little bit... My boss wants me to do some research in finding which hardware is most used under Linux(ex. Dell servers, Barebones Kits, HP & Compaq servers, etc.) This is just for budgeting issues...he wants to get rid of some o

Re: [CentOS] School Server Setup

Bent Terp wrote: On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 7:20 AM, lingu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: install.I recommend u either fedora6 or fedora 8. 6 ?!?! Why in the name of the holy penguin would anybody want to install FC6 today? FC6 no longer gets security updates, and CentOS-5 was based on FC6 anyway

Re: [CentOS] Re: Copying files from specific date.

Scott Silva wrote: I know this has never been brought up before, certainly not in the last month or so, but this list has some conventions: 1) Trim your replies 2) Bottom post I thought I heard that somewhere! ;-P oh boy ... I feel another 100 post thread coming :D signature.asc Desc

Re: [CentOS] Setting up a chroot

Mark Hull-Richter wrote: On Thu, 2008-05-29 at 13:52 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: Probably the best thing to do is to use mock to build in. You provide it with some repos and it automatically creates a chroot to build things. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Projects/Mock That has some

Re: [CentOS] yum upgrade 4.3 -> current ?

Karanbir Singh wrote: Matt Hyclak wrote: If it were me, I would download the latest yum+dependencies and install them via rpm before trying to debug an old yum. Absolutely. Make sure you get the newer yum with the yum-metadataparser, That helps a lot with ram usage and also speed of the tra

Re: [CentOS] Newer GNOME than base release

MHR wrote: On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 1:31 PM, Kai Schaetzl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: If you do not need CentOS for the reasons that most here use it then why don't you use Fedora if that gives you what you want? No one will be angry about you ;-) Heh, heh, as in, don't let the door hit you on

Re: [CentOS] Newer GNOME than base release

Johnny Hughes wrote: MHR wrote: On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 1:31 PM, Kai Schaetzl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: If you do not need CentOS for the reasons that most here use it then why don't you use Fedora if that gives you what you want? No one will be angry about you ;-) Heh, heh, a

Re: [CentOS] Could this be an advantage of CentOS over the PNAELV distribution?

Luigi Perroti wrote: Hello all, I understand that when releasing updates the CentOS team strips logos and such things from the upstream sources. If I'm not mistaken there is also a certain QA process going on before the actual releases, at least for major updates like the upcoming 5.2 version.

Re: [CentOS] LDAP syncrepl incompatibility between CentOS 4.x and 5.x

syncing c5 and c4. However, it is a couple updates behind. The version is openldap-2.3.27-4.el4.centos Thanks, Johnny Hughes signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Urgent Help Required!!!!!!!!!!!

rajeev sharma wrote:   Hi All,   I am Rajeev. I have download centOS 5.1 i386 files for installing Linux. I tried my ways but my DVD is not getting recognised while booting. I have windows XP SP2 32-bit. Let me know the files that need to be burned for installing centOS 5.1 i386.   Queries : 1.

Re: [CentOS] Reg. setting Domain name on Cento 5 pc

home.local $ hostname --fqdn myth.home.local $ dnsdomainname home.local Note: use also used the domainname command, that command has nothing to do with dns names, but with "the system’s NIS/YP domain name". Thanks, Johnny Hughes signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___

Re: [CentOS] Network FS w/o user setup

Ted Miller wrote: Is there a file system + configuration that will let me share a directory, and anyone who has access to something in that directory on the server will also have access (and lack of access) to the same files from the client? Clients will be Centos5, Win2K, WinXP. Server is Cen

<    3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   >