Re: [CentOS] How to Upgrade GNOME

On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 11:16:14AM +0530, Sadaruwan Samaraweera wrote: > Hi, > > Can any one tell me how to upgrade from the current GNOME version to > a new version with out upgrading my distribution. > If you "need" to upgrade gnome, then you don't really need CentOS. Read more about the purpo

Re: [CentOS] libapr issue - CentOS 4.7

I've had a similar problem, and it was a software that had a custom version of gdbm library and set LD_LIBRARY_PATH in profile to make sure that version would be used. Do you have LD_LIBRARY_PATH set? What does this command say: # echo $LD_LIBRARY_PATH If you do, try unsetting it before start

Re: [CentOS] libapr issue - CentOS 4.7

After this, what does # ls -l /usr/lib/libaprutil-0.so.0 link to? it seems to be getting changed back!! # rm -f /usr/lib/libaprutil-0.so.0 # ln -s /usr/lib/libaprutil-0.so.0.9.4 /usr/lib/libaprutil-0.so.0 # ls -l /usr/lib/libaprutil-0.so.0 /usr/lib/libaprutil-0.so.0 -> /usr/lib/libaprutil

[CentOS] Virtual NICs (aliases like eth0:1) won't come up after reboot

With one problem down I still have another remaining. Since the installation of our primairy webserver we have had a problem with the network aliasses. Our server has 8 IP adresses so we used the tool provided in the GUI to specify (and name - for our own convinience) eth0 aliasses with the o

Re: [CentOS] Virtual NICs (aliases like eth0:1) won't come up after reboot

Berend Dekens wrote: > However, after a reboot, all aliasses are disabled: they are present in > the configuration but they are not activated. I feared I did something > wrong so I removed all addresses, tried to find more clues in the docs > and now I'm back where I started. Go into /etc/sy

[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 45, Issue 7

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to [EMAIL PROTECTED] You can reac

Re: [CentOS] SVN missing libexpat.so.0 while it is present *SOLVED*

On Thu, 13 Nov 2008, Berend Dekens wrote: I just found out that the other machine holding the SVN repository was recently updated. So after trying on that one I got the same error! (Which ofcourse made me think) It seems that SVN invokes a remote copy of the binary for reading the repo and s

Re: [CentOS] How to Upgrade GNOME

Sadaruwan Samaraweera wrote: Hi, Can any one tell me how to upgrade from the current GNOME version to a new version with out upgrading my distribution. Read the archives. You DON'T want to do this ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http

Re: [CentOS] Virtual NICs (aliases like eth0:1) won't come up after reboot

None of the files have ONBOOT but they do have ONPARENT... I'll add the ONBOOT param and reboot the server tonight to see if it worked. Cheers, Berend Ralph Angenendt wrote: Berend Dekens wrote: However, after a reboot, all aliasses are disabled: they are present in the configuration but

Re: [CentOS] How to Upgrade GNOME

On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 12:46 AM, Sadaruwan Samaraweera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Can any one tell me how to upgrade from the current GNOME version to > a new version with out upgrading my distribution. Short answer: There is no supported way for doing this. Longer Answer: The unsupported m

Re: [CentOS] Virtual NICs (aliases like eth0:1) won't come up after reboot

Ralph Angenendt wrote on Thu, 13 Nov 2008 12:16:22 +0100: > If they have "ONBOOT=YES" change that to "ONPARENT=YES". If they have > neither, add ONPARENT=YES. FYI: I've been creating NIC aliases with ONBOOT=yes for quite some time without a problem as I wasn't aware of the ONPARENT directive. I

Re: [CentOS] atl2.ko in Centos 5

junior.listas wrote: Somebody already get atl2.ko compiled in centos5 ??? JC Yes .. i had to build it for my Asus Eee PC 900 , but the wiki already knew it : http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Laptops/Asus/Eeepc Don't forget that i've built the kmod for the stock 5.2 kernel but it survives a ke

Re: [CentOS] libapr issue - CentOS 4.7

Tom Brown wrote: ... > it seems to be getting changed back!! You should have moved the 0.9.6 file before running ldconfig, as I wrote. If something else depends upon the 0.9.6 file, this could be started after having set LD_LIBRARY_PATH to the directory where you've moved the 0.9.6 file. Mogens

Re: [CentOS] SVN missing libexpat.so.0 while it is present

John wrote: > John wrote: > > Sometimes conlflicts can be created between the two. RPM and Yum. > > No. > > > Run rpm --rebuilddb > > How is that supposed to help in this case? > > Ralph > > Was hoping you could explain? :-) Now I think about it I cant either :-) No, I cannot explain how tha

Re: [CentOS] Virtual NICs (aliases like eth0:1) won't come up after reboot

Update: Didn't help - but this time I was connected to a console so I could see the bootup and I get this: "SIOCSIFFLAGS: Cannot assign requested address" Strange thing is that I have multiple aliasses and only 3 errors... I tried Google with this error and I see lots of people with Ubuntu run

[CentOS] Re: Virtual NICs (aliases like eth0:1) won't come up after reboot

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Berend Dekens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Update: Didn't help - but this time I was connected to a console so I > could see the bootup and I get this: > "SIOCSIFFLAGS: Cannot assign requested address" > > Strange thing is that I have multiple aliasses and only 3 e

Re: [CentOS] Re: Virtual NICs (aliases like eth0:1) won't come up after reboot

Tony Mountifield wrote: Could you post the output of: head -20 /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0* Cheers Tony [EMAIL PROTECTED] network-scripts]# head -20 /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0* # Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] 79c970 [PCnet32 LANCE] DEVICE=eth0 BOOTPROTO=none BRO

Re: [CentOS] close open relay

Jerry Geis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote (with a few extraneous bits removed): Original Message >>> >>> Date: Wednesday, November 12, 2008 03:33:11 PM -0500 From: Jerry Geis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: CentOS ML Subject: [CentOS] close open re

Re: [CentOS] How to Upgrade GNOME

Sadaruwan Samaraweera wrote: > Can any one tell me how to upgrade from the current GNOME > version to > a new version with out upgrading my distribution. > Hmm, a quick search reveals this was posted last month in the CentOS list by a certain Sadaruwan Samaraweera. Do you know him? http://li

[CentOS] Re: Virtual NICs (aliases like eth0:1) won't come up after reboot

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Berend Dekens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Tony Mountifield wrote: > > Could you post the output of: head -20 > > /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0* > > > > Cheers > > Tony > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] network-scripts]# head -20 > /etc/sysconfig/network-scrip

[CentOS] CPU benchmarking tools

Can anyone suggest a good CPU, and memory if possible, benchmarking tool as we have some new kit that needs benchmarks running against it. thanks ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] linux rescue - complete list of utilities and commands?

On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 10:43 AM, Phil Schaffner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Lanny Marcus wrote: >> Question: Is there a complete list somewhere, of which System >> Utilities and Commands are available, if one boots into "linux >> rescue"? > > If rescue mode manages to mount your installed system

Re: [CentOS] CPU benchmarking tools

Tom Brown wrote: Can anyone suggest a good CPU, and memory if possible, benchmarking tool as we have some new kit that needs benchmarks running against it. measure your application performance. anything else is BS. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@

Re: [CentOS] xmms-flac missing dependency

On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 12:27 PM, Karanbir Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Lanny Marcus wrote: >> I tried. I sent an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] but apparently >> one must be a member of that list, to send messages to the list. > much like any other list. including this one. I know but yesterda

Re: [CentOS] xmms-flac missing dependency

On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 1:12 PM, MHR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 9:24 AM, Lanny Marcus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 11:59 AM, Karanbir Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Lanny Marcus wrote: >>> So you better let them know real quick so they can f

Re: [CentOS] How to Upgrade GNOME

On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 12:46 AM, Sadaruwan Samaraweera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Can any one tell me how to upgrade from the current GNOME version to > a new version with out upgrading my distribution. If you want the latest and greatest, you don't want to use an Enterprise Distro. Consider m

Re: [CentOS] CPU benchmarking tools

measure your application performance. anything else is BS. well not really as we have different CPU's from Intel and AMD and we want to see how these benchmark without benchmarking the apps(s) as apps are many and benchmarking them all against all the apps is not possible. ___

Re: [CentOS] CPU benchmarking tools

Tom Brown wrote: > >> >> >> measure your application performance. anything else is BS. > > > well not really as we have different CPU's from Intel and AMD and we > want to see how these benchmark without benchmarking the apps(s) as apps > are many and benchmarking them all against all the apps is

Re: [CentOS] CPU benchmarking tools

Tom Brown wrote: measure your application performance. anything else is BS. well not really as we have different CPU's from Intel and AMD and we want to see how these benchmark without benchmarking the apps(s) as apps are many and benchmarking them all against all the apps is not possib

[CentOS] Is there in CentOS 5 Compiz?

Hi all, I have one maybe stupid question - is there in CentOS 5 packages of Compiz Fusion? I am deciding between Fedora and CentOS to install it to my netbook and this is one of most important features that I want. Thank for replies ___ CentOS mailing l

[CentOS] Video Card

I want to be able to use a late-model video card with either Nvidia or ATI (AMD) chips that have the capability to use the GPU for numeric processing through the CUDA or AMD Stream SDKs. I can't find any good source for hardware that really works under Linux, not to speak of Centos. I need a spec

Re: [CentOS] Re: Virtual NICs (aliases like eth0:1) won't come up after reboot

Tony Mountifield wrote: Hmmm, in a previous post you said you had multiple aliases and three errors. But above, you have only posted one main device and one alias. Are they ones that succeed of fail? Every one of them fails except eth0 itself (which is good or I would have locked myself out).

Re: [CentOS] Virtual NICs (aliases like eth0:1) won't come up after reboot

or, at the same time while you are waiting for more replies, you could try starting up with only the first alias and if that succeeds try the next one and so on ... If you get less errors than you have aliases it's likely that some of the files have simply wrong values. Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Be

RE: [CentOS] SVN missing libexpat.so.0 while it is present

>>Ralph Wrote: >>BTW: It would be great if you could fix your mail client so one can see >>which parts of a mail were written by you and which were written by >>others. - it is >>written for usenet, but most of it also applies to mailing lists, if n

RE: [CentOS] Video Card

>>Tom Browder Wrote: >>I can't find any good source for hardware that really works under >>Linux, not to speak of Centos. I need a specific model and brand that >>a user has successfully been able to use the proprietary driver for >>under Linux. JohnStanley Writes: http://www.nvidia.com/object/

Re: [CentOS] close open relay

On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 3:53 PM, Ross Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Nov 12, 2008, at 5:08 PM, Jerry Geis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >> lists-centos wrote: >>> >>> sorry, the start page is: >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> look at the headers of the original mess

Re: [CentOS] Is there in CentOS 5 Compiz?

Compiz is pretty resource intensive. As a result it will also use your power/(unit time) this might not be the best desktop environment for a netbook. Assuming it will even play well with the netbook's video card. Good luck, Michael Schenck happymaster23 wrote: Hi all, I have one maybe stu

Re: [CentOS] How to Upgrade GNOME

On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 9:46 PM, Sadaruwan Samaraweera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > Can any one tell me how to upgrade from the current GNOME version to > a new version with out upgrading my distribution. > Short answer: you can't. Right answer: Don't. Long answer: Google is your friend

[CentOS] bluetooth pand help

Help, please. The man pand talks about a /etc/bluetooth/pan/dev-up; there is no such file on any of my Centos systems. I have studied http://bluez.sourceforge.net/contrib/HOWTO-PAN, so I have some of the basics. The only Centos related pand writeup I have found is http://howto.basjes.nl/l

Re: [CentOS] Re: close open relay

Jerry Geis wrote: It should be: DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Port=smtp, Name=MTA') I changed it to this and restarted sendmail, re-ran the test and still open. To fix the OpenRelay, just edit your /etc/mail/access to have it something like that: 8<=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-C-U-T-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [CentOS] Is there in CentOS 5 Compiz?

Thank you for reply, but Compiz can be easily switched off when you are on battery and the GMA950 have enough power to handle it on 1024*600 resolution. This is no problem. I like CentOS because of its stability (and I am using it on servers), but I don´t know how it will appear on desktop. Yes, C

Re: [CentOS] Is there in CentOS 5 Compiz?

CentOS is a "more secure" RHEL, I'm not at all sure where you got "better HW support"... By the way, you can always add a repository that has Compiz and still use CentOS. What kind of Netbook are you running? That being said, I am curious to hear how compiz goes. Best Regards, Michael Schenck

Re: [CentOS] Is there in CentOS 5 Compiz?

On Thu, 13 Nov 2008 14:48:53 -0500 "Michael Schenck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > CentOS is a "more secure" RHEL, I'm not at all sure where you got > "better HW support"... CentOS is identical to RHEL, except for the copyrights, licensing and logos. The keyword is identical. Why is it more secur

Re: [CentOS] Is there in CentOS 5 Compiz?

I am going to buy Eee PC S101 (1,6 GHz Atom, 1 GB RAM, ...), but these specs are same on most of netbooks. You can find some videos of Compiz on Eee PC 701 at youtube.com which works flawlessly, so I am convinced, that on next generation Eee PCs (901, S101) there will be no problems even if S101 ha

Re: [CentOS] Is there in CentOS 5 Compiz?

I thought the were default configuration differences between RHEL and CentOS such that in theory it was "more secure" out of the box. On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 2:56 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 13 Nov 2008 14:48:53 -0500 > "Michael Schenck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > CentOS is a "

Re: [CentOS] Is there in CentOS 5 Compiz?

happymaster23 wrote: > I have one maybe stupid question - is there in CentOS 5 > packages of Compiz > Fusion? I am deciding between Fedora and CentOS to install > it to my netbook > and this is one of most important features that I want. > Make your decision between Fedora and CentOS not on the

Re: [CentOS] Virtual NICs (aliases like eth0:1) won't come up after reboot

Kai Schaetzl schreef: or, at the same time while you are waiting for more replies, you could try starting up with only the first alias and if that succeeds try the next one and so on ... I was doing exactly that. And I was trying to figure out how the networking scripts work and what they do -

Re: [CentOS] atl2.ko in Centos 5

On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 1:07 PM, junior.listas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > Somebody already get atl2.ko compiled in centos5 ??? > > JC > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > Not exactly your q

[CentOS] kmod-xfs and weak-updates

I installed kmod-xfs-0.4-2 back with kernel-2.6.18-92.1.13. I have updated kernels but there have been no new kmod-xfs. It still works because of weak-updates (I guess). Currently: # find /lib/modules -name xfs.ko /lib/modules/2.6.18-92.1.13.el5/extra/xfs/xfs.ko /lib/modules/2.6.18-92.1.13.el

Re: [CentOS] Video Card

On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 12:53 PM, John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>Tom Browder Wrote: > >>>I can't find any good source for hardware that really works under >>>Linux, not to speak of Centos. I need a specific model and brand that >>>a user has successfully been able to use the proprietary driver

Re: [CentOS] kmod-xfs and weak-updates

Tony Schreiner wrote: I installed kmod-xfs-0.4-2 back with kernel-2.6.18-92.1.13. I have updated kernels but there have been no new kmod-xfs. It still works because of weak-updates (I guess). Currently: # find /lib/modules -name xfs.ko /lib/modules/2.6.18-92.1.13.el5/extra/xfs/xfs.ko /lib/modu

Re: [CentOS] Is there in CentOS 5 Compiz?

On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 1:02 PM, happymaster23 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have one maybe stupid question - is there in CentOS 5 packages of Compiz > Fusion? I am deciding between Fedora and CentOS to install it to my netbook > and this is one of most important features that I want. Suggest tha

Re: [CentOS] Re: mapserver experience?

On Friday 07 November 2008 09:29:42 am Dave Stevens wrote: > On Friday 07 November 2008 12:39:50 am Laurent Wandrebeck wrote: > > 2008/11/7 Scott Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > on 11-6-2008 3:35 PM Dave Stevens spake the following: > > >> I have Centos 5.2 and want to install mapserver. On my Fed

Re: [CentOS] Re: mapserver experience?

2008/11/13 Dave Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Friday 07 November 2008 09:29:42 am Dave Stevens wrote: >> On Friday 07 November 2008 12:39:50 am Laurent Wandrebeck wrote: >> > 2008/11/7 Scott Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> > > on 11-6-2008 3:35 PM Dave Stevens spake the following: >> > >> I have

Re: [CentOS] Re: mapserver experience?

Dave Stevens wrote: I have advice to use this repo: http://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/publiclist/EPEL/5/ but I don't understand how to enable it. Usually I would put it into yum.conf but it seems yum is reading from yum.conf.d. Do I make a text snippet as a file or add this to another repo's f

Re: [CentOS] Re: mapserver experience?

On Thursday 13 November 2008 02:09:53 pm Laurent Wandrebeck wrote: > 2008/11/13 Dave Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On Friday 07 November 2008 09:29:42 am Dave Stevens wrote: > >> On Friday 07 November 2008 12:39:50 am Laurent Wandrebeck wrote: > >> > 2008/11/7 Scott Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >

Re: [CentOS] CPU benchmarking tools

In this month's IEEE Spectrum magazine there is an interesting study on multi core CPUs and 'intensive computing' done at Sandia labs Seems like with the current data bus architecture, 8 core is the max for data access intensive applications like data mining. So I am thinking that if you ne

Re: [CentOS] kmod-xfs and weak-updates

Tony Schreiner wrote: My question is: kernel 2.6.18-92.1.13 is now the oldest one present on my system and will be removed next update. Do I need to worry about that? Will it take the remaining kmod-xfs with it? Only files directly owned by the kernel will get removed when the kernel rpm is r

Re: [CentOS] Is there in CentOS 5 Compiz?

happymaster23 wrote: I have one maybe stupid question - is there in CentOS 5 packages of Compiz Fusion? I am deciding between Fedora and CentOS to install it to my netbook and this is one of most important features that I want. CentOS-5 ships with Compiz included in the distro, so if you have

Re: [CentOS] CPU benchmarking tools

On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 05:40:04PM +, Tom Brown wrote: >> >> measure your application performance. anything else is BS. >h > well not really as we have different CPU's from Intel and AMD and we > want to see how these benchmark without benchmarking the apps(s) as apps > are many and bench

Re: [CentOS] CPU benchmarking tools

Am 13.11.2008 um 18:40 schrieb Tom Brown: measure your application performance. anything else is BS. well not really as we have different CPU's from Intel and AMD and we want to see how these benchmark without benchmarking the apps(s) as apps are many and benchmarking them all agai

Re: [CentOS] kmod-xfs and weak-updates

Karanbir Singh wrote: Tony Schreiner wrote: My question is: kernel 2.6.18-92.1.13 is now the oldest one present on my system and will be removed next update. Do I need to worry about that? Will it take the remaining kmod-xfs with it? Only files directly owned by the kernel will get removed wh

Re: [CentOS] Setting up eth0 with address 0.0.0.0

2008/11/11 Filipe Brandenburger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Try this in ifcfg-eth0: > > DEVICE=eth0 > ONBOOT=yes > TYPE=Ethernet > IPADDR= > > Yes, that's an empty IPADDR variable, that is how you should configure Hi Filipe, It worked on the test server but on other servers were we tried it, it turned

Re: [CentOS] atl2.ko in Centos 5

Sorry, may i be wrong, but I was compiled this module for other distro, with kernel 2.6.18, from http://people.redhat.com/csnook/atl2/, the the version is 2.0.5, Wy we use 1.0 version?? There is some note for why the module ( 2.0 ) does not compile under centos?? thanks for your attention..