I thought the were default configuration differences between RHEL and CentOS such that in theory it was "more secure" out of the box.
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 2:56 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 13 Nov 2008 14:48:53 -0500 > "Michael Schenck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > CentOS is a "more secure" RHEL, I'm not at all sure where you got > > "better HW support"... > > CentOS is identical to RHEL, except for the copyrights, licensing and > logos. The keyword is identical. > > Why is it more secure? Why would CentOS have better HW support? > > > -- > Thanks > http://www.911networks.com > When the network has to work >
_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
