: cegcc-devel
Subject: Re: [Cegcc-devel] Porting cegcc changes to latest version of cegcc
Everything is not over yet.
There is still a large amount of windows mobile device out there that deserve
cegcc.
"windows phone" may be a silly thing, it's not the dominant os on the marke
Everything is not over yet.
There is still a large amount of windows mobile device out there that
deserve cegcc.
"windows phone" may be a silly thing, it's not the dominant os on the market
yet.
I hope cegcc will continue to live for those of us who have normal WM
phones.
Remember, there is sti
Pavel Pavlov wrote:
>
> I think I was subscribed to cegcc before 4.5.0 was released (release date
> is like a couple of months ago).
> I tried to merge and see what I can do to fix it, but I came to conclusion
> that it's all wasted time. I'm not going to do this same job once there is
> a new g
> -Original Message-
> From: Vincent Richomme [mailto:foru...@smartmobili.com]
> Sent: Friday, July 16, 2010 16:22
> To: Pavel Pavlov
> Cc: danny.ba...@scarlet.be; cegcc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Cegcc-devel] Porting cegcc changes to latest version of
On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 16:45:51 -0400
wrote:
>> > I also thought about updating cegcc, but decided against it because I
>> > found merging/rebasing with Subversion too cumbersome. Thought about
>> > doing it cleanly with git (import gcc svn with all its history, copy
>> > cegcc on top, rebase on late
> > I also thought about updating cegcc, but decided against it because I
> > found merging/rebasing with Subversion too cumbersome. Thought about
> > doing it cleanly with git (import gcc svn with all its history, copy
> > cegcc on top, rebase on latest gcc) - this way, we could easily
> > extrac
> -Original Message-
> From: Danny Backx [mailto:danny.ba...@scarlet.be]
> Sent: Monday, July 12, 2010 16:20
> To: Pavel Pavlov
> Cc: cegcc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: RE: [Cegcc-devel] Porting cegcc changes to latest version of cegcc
>
> On Mon, 2
On Mon, 2010-07-12 at 08:23 +0200, Max Kellermann wrote:
> On 2010/07/11 10:11, Danny Backx wrote:
> > I can give you and other interested parties write access to the cegcc
> > svn if you like.
>
> Hi Danny & Pavel,
>
> I also thought about updating cegcc, but decided against it because I
> foun
On Mon, 2010-07-12 at 14:59 -0400, Pavel Pavlov wrote:
> After checking some files I noticed that VERSIONS file and checked out
> octorer 17 2009 version of binutils. I merged all the changes into
> latest version of binutils. Also, I noticed that versions of binutils
> in cegcc svn has some strang
> > On 2010/07/11 10:11, Danny Backx wrote:
> >> I can give you and other interested parties write access to the cegcc
> >> svn if you like.
> >
> > Hi Danny & Pavel,
> >
> > I also thought about updating cegcc, but decided against it because I
> > found merging/rebasing with Subversion too cumber
> -Original Message-
> From: Danny Backx [mailto:danny.ba...@scarlet.be]
> Cc: cegcc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Cegcc-devel] Porting cegcc changes to latest version of cegcc
>
> On Sat, 2010-07-10 at 19:41 -0400, Pavel Pavlov wrote:
> > I'm
On Mon, 12 Jul 2010, Max Kellermann wrote:
> On 2010/07/11 10:11, Danny Backx wrote:
>> I can give you and other interested parties write access to the cegcc
>> svn if you like.
>
> Hi Danny & Pavel,
>
> I also thought about updating cegcc, but decided against it because I
> found merging/rebas
On 2010/07/11 10:11, Danny Backx wrote:
> I can give you and other interested parties write access to the cegcc
> svn if you like.
Hi Danny & Pavel,
I also thought about updating cegcc, but decided against it because I
found merging/rebasing with Subversion too cumbersome. Thought about
doing i
On Sat, 2010-07-10 at 19:41 -0400, Pavel Pavlov wrote:
> I'm thinking to update my version of cegcc to latest version of gcc. It look
> as the project is almost sleeping now.
That's because my wife and daughter "stole" my two devices in exchange
for me being "allowed" to buy an Android phone.
>
I'm thinking to update my version of cegcc to latest version of gcc. It look as
the project is almost sleeping now.
So, I'd like to try to take changes made in cegcc into some latest release of
binutils and gcc. What's the recommended way to do it?..
I already tried to compare, but the difference
Danny Backx escreveu:
> On Tue, 2007-09-04 at 13:55 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Is it possible to port the cegcc toolset to windows CE,so that it could be
>> used
>> for onboard compiling (like Pocket Gcc from Vitaly Vitaliy Pronkin).
>
> In theory, I guess this is possible. But
On Tue, 2007-09-04 at 13:55 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is it possible to port the cegcc toolset to windows CE,so that it could be
> used
> for onboard compiling (like Pocket Gcc from Vitaly Vitaliy Pronkin).
In theory, I guess this is possible. But getting this done is a *very*
l
I was told that with eTcl (see www.evolane.com), tinyCC would be included,
allowing the mix of Tcl and C code (no C++, it seems).
Pascal
Selon [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Hi,
>
> Is it possible to port the cegcc toolset to windows CE,so that it could be
> used
> for onboard compiling (like Pocket Gcc f
Hi,
Is it possible to port the cegcc toolset to windows CE,so that it could be
used
for onboard compiling (like Pocket Gcc from Vitaly Vitaliy Pronkin).
best regards
Thomas Fritz
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splun
19 matches
Mail list logo
