> -----Original Message----- > From: Vincent Richomme [mailto:foru...@smartmobili.com] > Sent: Friday, July 16, 2010 16:22 > To: Pavel Pavlov > Cc: danny.ba...@scarlet.be; cegcc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: Re: [Cegcc-devel] Porting cegcc changes to latest version of cegcc > > On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 16:45:51 -0400 > wrote: > >> > I also thought about updating cegcc, but decided against it because > >> > I found merging/rebasing with Subversion too cumbersome. Thought > >> > about doing it cleanly with git (import gcc svn with all its > >> > history, copy cegcc on top, rebase on latest gcc) - this way, we > >> > could easily extract separate patches from cegcc, and submit them to > gcc. > >> > >> I won't go into a discussion about which version management system to > >> use, I know too little of the differences between them. I doubt that > >> subversion, or even cvs, give you much less useful support here. > >> > >> Basically, take a diff between 4.4.0 and (somewhere before my DLL > >> changes) and you should be up and running quickly. > >> > > > > Hi Danny, > > I tried to do the merge into gcc tags/release_4_5_0 mearged all > conflicts, > > made a couple of changes, but the end result is discouraging. > > First of all, if I tried my simple test related to alignment, I see > > that the 4.5.0 cegcc does not align stack variables, the other big > > issue is > that > > it still has double size dlls full of zeros. > > > > I tried to check your changes related to 6.1 dll, and these changes > > are really small (two commits only). I tried to comment them out but > > the > result > > was still the same and did not have any effect. > > Maybe I didn't do something correctly... or maybe your change didn't > > actually have that negative effect. Are you sure that because of your > > change you get that problem? > > thanks > > > > > > Hi, > > Just for information, when I was still using actively cegcc and watching this > ML > I think Pedro Alves made a patch for gcc-4.5. > Please try to find it in the archives and if you cannot find it I will try. >
I think I was subscribed to cegcc before 4.5.0 was released (release date is like a couple of months ago). I tried to merge and see what I can do to fix it, but I came to conclusion that it's all wasted time. I'm not going to do this same job once there is a new gcc, since they don't want to take cegcc changes into mainline and they announced that arm-wince-pe support will be removed in 4.6.x. It's even difficult to get any replies related to arm/wince on gcc mailing list. If windows phone won't support native development I really hope that winphone7 will be born dead and completely eliminated from the marked asap. Major apps announced that they are dropping windows mobile support: firefox mobile, skype and almost every app that had a windows mobile port as a supplementary port. Wince existed for years and newbies like iphone and android stormed by wince and the only reason I personally programmed for wince is because it's possible to use portable code that runs on pc and windows mobile. I hardly doubt that I'll be ever learning Silverlight or whatever is required for winphone 7, or better to say I hope they miserably fail so that I wouldn't need to learn what Silverlight Is all about ... In one of their blogs about winpne7 and silverlight they said something like "500000 silverlight developers in a matter of a day became also windows phone 7 developers"... is that 500000 downloads of Silverlight they consider that there is 500000developers??!?? Complete BS... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone? Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first _______________________________________________ Cegcc-devel mailing list Cegcc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cegcc-devel
