> > I also thought about updating cegcc, but decided against it because I > > found merging/rebasing with Subversion too cumbersome. Thought about > > doing it cleanly with git (import gcc svn with all its history, copy > > cegcc on top, rebase on latest gcc) - this way, we could easily > > extract separate patches from cegcc, and submit them to gcc. > > I won't go into a discussion about which version management system to use, > I know too little of the differences between them. I doubt that subversion, > or even cvs, give you much less useful support here. > > Basically, take a diff between 4.4.0 and (somewhere before my DLL > changes) and you should be up and running quickly. >
Hi Danny, I tried to do the merge into gcc tags/release_4_5_0 mearged all conflicts, made a couple of changes, but the end result is discouraging. First of all, if I tried my simple test related to alignment, I see that the 4.5.0 cegcc does not align stack variables, the other big issue is that it still has double size dlls full of zeros. I tried to check your changes related to 6.1 dll, and these changes are really small (two commits only). I tried to comment them out but the result was still the same and did not have any effect. Maybe I didn't do something correctly... or maybe your change didn't actually have that negative effect. Are you sure that because of your change you get that problem? thanks ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone? Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first _______________________________________________ Cegcc-devel mailing list Cegcc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cegcc-devel
