hello there,
yesterday I submitted a bug report using the tracker on SourceForge.
the address is:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1666403&group_id=173455&atid=865514
I've noticed that the tracker does not seem to be used, so I don't
know if you even received a notificati
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> (minor, miniscule nit: perhaps the file names could have the timestamp on
> them too (eg:20080231)? An svn revision isn't going to be meaningful to a lot
> of people :) )
thanks, applied :-)
cheers,
Aldo
hello again,
having lobbied for them, I decided to make the cygwin binaries I built
available for others.
take a look at: http://dada.perl.it/cegcc/
the page should be self-explanatory enough. I hope there are no
problems with a) the build itself, b) the fact that I'm distributing
it, and c) wha
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> My build crashes here:
>
> [...]
>
> This is with the buildscript build-cegcc.sh
strange, everything went just fine for me. both build-cegcc.sh and
build-mingw32ce.sh finished without an error. may be you have a
different cygwin's gcc version? I'm currently using:
gcc v
Danny Backx wrote:
> Attached is a first adaptation. Does this help ?
it does indeed. funny how I didn't noticed the two scripts :-)
regarding the doc, maybe mentioning somewhere to start with:
svn co https://cegcc.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/cegcc/trunk cegcc
would help the clueless ones. and
hello again!
ok, I admit I'm lost. I'm trying to build cegcc on a Cygwin system.
Pedro says it should build just fine, so I'm probably missing
something obvious.
first, I downloaded the trunk branch from SVN. the instructions at
http://cegcc.sourceforge.net/docs/build-toolchain.html mention a
bui
Pedro Alves wrote:
> Nahh, we're cool around here :)
hey, I wasn't suggesting that parrot people are uncool :-)
> I use something similar to run the gdb testsuite. I use the synce
> command line tools to download the
> files to the device.
sounds cool. I would have preferred not having PocketCo
hello there,
I know this mailing list is about developing cegcc, while my questions
are more about *using* cegcc, but I'll try anyway :-)
basically, I'm trying to find a way to "smooth out" the process of
porting an application that already have a Configure-type script (the
kind of script which g