[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> (minor, miniscule nit: perhaps the file names could have the timestamp on
> them too (eg:20080231)?  An svn revision isn't going to be meaningful to a lot
> of people :) )

thanks, applied :-)

cheers,
Aldo

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Cegcc-devel mailing list
Cegcc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cegcc-devel

Reply via email to