[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > (minor, miniscule nit: perhaps the file names could have the timestamp on > them too (eg:20080231)? An svn revision isn't going to be meaningful to a lot > of people :) )
thanks, applied :-) cheers, Aldo ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Cegcc-devel mailing list Cegcc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cegcc-devel