On Sun, 2010-01-03 at 21:53 +0100, Kai Tietz wrote:
> 2010/1/3 Danny Backx :
> > On Sun, 2010-01-03 at 21:14 +0100, Kai Tietz wrote:
> >> Ah, one point I missed here to describe, why I didn't changed
> >> pe.em/pe.sc here. The reason is, that by using pseudo-relocation
> >> version 1, the IAT table
On Sun, 2010-01-03 at 21:14 +0100, Kai Tietz wrote:
> Yes, I am still listening to this thread ;)
Thanks !
> 2010/1/3 Kai Tietz :
> > Those are the original patches I've sent. (as remark, those patches
> > are just changing pep.em, but the same patch for it has to be added to
> > pe.em, too). Lik
On Sunday 03 January 2010 13:33:57, Vincent R. wrote:
> Originally pseudo-reloc v2 was necessary to fix IAT address because
> until now it was NULL.
In reality, IIUC, the IAT needed fixing as a prerequisite for
pseudo-relocs v2 to work. This (binutils/ld fix) was also required
for WM6.1. It was
On Sunday 03 January 2010 16:32:39, Danny Backx wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-01-03 at 12:11 +, Pedro Alves wrote:
> > On Saturday 02 January 2010 16:42:23, Danny Backx wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2010-01-01 at 16:24 +, Pedro Alves wrote:
> > > > FYI, I hadn't applied the ld patch myself because I was
> >
On Sun, 2010-01-03 at 12:11 +, Pedro Alves wrote:
> On Saturday 02 January 2010 16:42:23, Danny Backx wrote:
> > On Fri, 2010-01-01 at 16:24 +, Pedro Alves wrote:
> > > FYI, I hadn't applied the ld patch myself because I was
> > > looking to confirm/hear if there's another cleaner way
> > >
On Sun, 3 Jan 2010 12:11:10 +, Pedro Alves
wrote:
> On Saturday 02 January 2010 16:42:23, Danny Backx wrote:
>> On Fri, 2010-01-01 at 16:24 +, Pedro Alves wrote:
>> > FYI, I hadn't applied the ld patch myself because I was
>> > looking to confirm/hear if there's another cleaner way
>> > to
On Saturday 02 January 2010 16:42:23, Danny Backx wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-01-01 at 16:24 +, Pedro Alves wrote:
> > FYI, I hadn't applied the ld patch myself because I was
> > looking to confirm/hear if there's another cleaner way
> > to get at the image base, but I can't find one. Anyway, I've
>
