Re: [cdesktopenv-devel] [PATCH] Refactor and reimplement dtudcfonted

2018-07-29 Thread Jon Trulson
I'm not sure what I'm supposed to do with this. These have been removed from master (via cde-next) some weeks ago, and would not build anymore even with this patch... In addition, you mention yourself that it's not done, so... Why did you submit it? :) Perhaps you need to occasionally rebase

Re: [cdesktopenv-devel] [PATCH] Refactor and reimplement dtudcfonted

2018-07-29 Thread Chase via cdesktopenv-devel
The patch requires the disabling and deleting commits to be reversed. Thank you for your time, -Chase ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On July 29, 2018 5:50 PM, Jon Trulson wrote: > I'm not sure what I'm supposed to do with this. These have been removed > from master (via cde-next) some weeks

Re: [cdesktopenv-devel] [PATCH] Refactor and reimplement dtudcfonted

2018-07-29 Thread Jon Trulson
That's not how this works... :) If you are going to support this, then you need to essentially re-add it as a new component... And it needs to be complete and functional at that time, and apply to whatever branch (master or cde-next) you are targeting... You can go back to an earlier versio

Re: [cdesktopenv-devel] [PATCH] Remove redundant motif widgets

2018-07-29 Thread Jon Trulson
merged to master. BTW: these are icons, not widgets. And they were definitely cruft :) -jon On 07/27/2018 07:40 PM, Chase via cdesktopenv-devel wrote: If we ever need these, we can simply include them via X11/bitmaps Thank you for your time, -Chase --

Re: [cdesktopenv-devel] [PATCH] Add upstream config files

2018-07-29 Thread Jon Trulson
I generally prefer not to add things "for the possible future". I did merge this to master though. And yes, I am 95% certain, they will not work properly without also updating other core cf/ components to upstream condition. -jon On 07/27/2018 04:20 PM, Chase via cdesktopenv-devel wrote: Th

Re: [cdesktopenv-devel] [PATCH] Use packaged nsgmls

2018-07-29 Thread Jon Trulson
This one perhaps needs some discussion... Is it better to keep the current nsgmls until we know whether all of the supported platforms are working before removing it? ie: Introduce support for running the system version (and not building the CDE version) in one patch or patches. Then when we

Re: [cdesktopenv-devel] [PATCH] Use packaged nsgmls

2018-07-29 Thread Marcin Cieslak
On Sat, 28 Jul 2018, Chase via cdesktopenv-devel wrote: > > We will now depend on the opensp package, the macro will most likely need > > to be changed for *bsd and solaris Is there an easy way to override the location other than patching the file? Marcin smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptogr

Re: [cdesktopenv-devel] [PATCH] Use packaged nsgmls

2018-07-29 Thread Jon Trulson
On 07/29/2018 05:07 PM, Marcin Cieslak wrote: On Sat, 28 Jul 2018, Chase via cdesktopenv-devel wrote: We will now depend on the opensp package, the macro will most likely need to be changed for *bsd and solaris Is there an easy way to override the location other than patching the file? Id

Re: [cdesktopenv-devel] [PATCH] Use packaged nsgmls

2018-07-29 Thread Matthew R. Trower
Jon Trulson writes: > Is it better to keep the current nsgmls until we know whether all of > the supported platforms are working before removing it? ie: Introduce > support for running the system version (and not building the CDE > version) in one patch or patches. Then when we are ready, we ca