Hi, I try to build the latest sources (from git) on Ubuntu 10.4
LTSP after the installation
of the download archive of motif on sourceforge and it ends with
errors:
###
LANG=it_IT.ISO8859-
Since everything seems to have compiled except documentation, I went
ahead installing CDE.
Back to lightdm and I login to CDE. Desktop starts (it goes past the
dthello)
and starts the panel, the help viewer and in a couple of seconds it crashes.
It freezes.
Is it possible it was that old Xorg bu
On 11/27/2012 01:23 PM, Antonis Tsolomitis wrote:
> Hi, I try to build the latest sources (from git) on Ubuntu 10.4 LTSP after the
> installation
> of the download archive of motif on sourceforge and it ends with errors:
Hi,
I had that once on CentOS 6, IIRC. Building without the documentation
p
On 11/27/2012 02:00 PM, Antonis Tsolomitis wrote:
>
> Since everything seems to have compiled except documentation, I went
> ahead installing CDE.
>
> Back to lightdm and I login to CDE. Desktop starts (it goes past the
> dthello)
> and starts the panel, the help viewer and in a couple of seconds i
The machine is listed in /etc/hosts (the name returned by hostname).
I checked ~/.dt/startlog and ~/.dt/sessionlogs/* (after I enabled
logging via .dtprofile)
I did not see anything strange. Some fonts not found and the Help is not
available (since it did not compile anyway).
I copy the contents
None of these errors will stop CDE from starting, so I don't think that is it.
The last time someone reported trying LTSP they reported the same issues you
have. No one has found a solution.
Make sure you have the languages set (check the wiki). Not setting them will
cause the build errors
See patch.
>From 8df4600ea26b7b995378eb20fb000fa21293c8ea Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Pascal Stumpf
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 21:12:23 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Avoid negative array subscript; break out of the loop if
that happens.
---
cde/lib/DtTerm/TermPrim/TermPrim.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 i
I know that the project requests that contributions be made under the MIT
license, but I was wondering whether 2-clause or 3-clause BSD would be an
appropriate alternative.
I read the section on licensing and why MIT is requested -- and from that
it would seem that those BSD licenses would be f
>
> Since everything seems to have compiled except documentation, I went
> ahead installing CDE.
>
> Back to lightdm and I login to CDE. Desktop starts (it goes past the
> dthello)
> and starts the panel, the help viewer and in a couple of seconds it crashes.
> It freezes.
>
> Is it possible it
On Tues, 27 Nov 2012 17:35:36 -0500 (EST) Robert Tomsick wrote:
> Subject: [cdesktopenv-devel] BSD licensed contributions?
> I know that the project requests that contributions be made under the
> MIT license, but I was wondering whether 2-clause or 3-clause BSD
> would be an appropriate alterna
On Tue, 27 Nov 2012, Isaac Dunham wrote:
> FYI: 3-clause BSD is MIT + "Binary distributions must include this
> copyright notice in accompanying documentation" (clause 2). 2-clause BSD
> drops the restriction on implying the endorsement of the copyright
> holder (clause 3), rather than the re
On Tue, 27 Nov 2012 20:53:59 -0500 (EST)
Robert Tomsick wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 27 Nov 2012, Isaac Dunham wrote:
>
> > FYI: 3-clause BSD is MIT + "Binary distributions must include this
> > copyright notice in accompanying documentation" (clause 2). 2-clause BSD
> > drops the restriction on imp
On Tue, 27 Nov 2012, Isaac Dunham wrote:
> Out of curiousity (not trying to argue against including it),
> 1. What's the benefit of using this tool?
Something to bind to Alt-F2 that fits in with an otherwise-all-Motif
desktop. :D Kinda like GNOME + KDE's runner, but not using GTK/Qt.
> 2. Wh
-Original Message-
From: Robert Tomsick
To: Isaac Dunham
Cc: cdesktopenv-devel
Sent: Tue, Nov 27, 2012 10:09 pm
Subject: Re: [cdesktopenv-devel] BSD licensed contributions?
On Tue, 27 Nov 2012, Isaac Dunham wrote:
> Out of curiousity (not trying to argue against including
On Tue, 27 Nov 2012, Christopher Turkel wrote:
> Is this dtrun, that you created for OpenCDE? if so, bring it on. I miss
> having a run dialog box.
Yes. Only written slightly better (straight C for starters...)
-Rob
---
On Tue, 27 Nov 2012, Isaac Dunham wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Nov 2012 20:53:59 -0500 (EST)
> Robert Tomsick wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, 27 Nov 2012, Isaac Dunham wrote:
>>
>>> FYI: 3-clause BSD is MIT + "Binary distributions must include this
>>> copyright notice in accompanying documentation" (clause 2).
On Tue, 27 Nov 2012, Robert Tomsick wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 27 Nov 2012, Christopher Turkel wrote:
>
>> Is this dtrun, that you created for OpenCDE? if so, bring it on. I miss
>> having a run dialog box.
>
> Yes. Only written slightly better (straight C for starters...)
>
> -Rob
>
Well, I'm no lawy
On Tue, 27 Nov 2012, Jon Trulson wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Nov 2012, Robert Tomsick wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, 27 Nov 2012, Christopher Turkel wrote:
>>
>>> Is this dtrun, that you created for OpenCDE? if so, bring it on. I miss
>>> having a run dialog box.
>>
>> Yes. Only written slightly better
On Tue, 27 Nov 2012, Pascal Stumpf wrote:
> See patch.
>
Applied.
--
Jon Trulson
"Oh the land of the free, and the home of the brave.
Are you heaven on Earth, or the gloom of the grave."
-- Iron Sky
--
19 matches
Mail list logo
