On Wed, 9 Sep 2020 at 06:34, Grant Taylor via cctalk
wrote:
>
> On 9/8/20 7:18 PM, Grant Taylor via cctalk wrote:
> > I haven't tested that specific ISO.
>
> The particular ISO that you linked to is Novell NetWare 5.1 (Support
> Pack 0). So it needs support packs installed on it.
But that's good
On 9/8/20 6:04 PM, Fred Cisin via cctalk wrote:
Date and time of Command.com and any other DOS files will identify the
version number.
I've got 11/26/85 on command.com.
DIR /A or
DIR /A:H
will let you see the hidden files (presumably IO.SYS and MSDOS.SYS; PC-DOS
had IBMBIO.COM and IBMDOS.CO
On Wed, 9 Sep 2020 at 18:56, Jules Richardson via cctalk
wrote:
>
> On 9/8/20 6:04 PM, Fred Cisin via cctalk wrote:
> > Date and time of Command.com and any other DOS files will identify the
> > version number.
Only after DOS 5 or so, I fear.
> I've got 11/26/85 on command.com.
>
> > DIR /A or
On 9/9/20 5:08 AM, Liam Proven via cctalk wrote:
But that's good, isn't it?
Yes and no.
Yes in that it's below the problem point. :-)
No in that I don't have the necessary Support Pack's to install. :-(
I confess I may have misread your original message as being "I need
NW5.1 with no SPs.
My Sunblade works fine with a generic USB keyboard, but does not
recognize the Type 7 USB keyboard I bought for it. OpenBoot prom
reports "no keyboard detected". If I boot with my generic keyboard
plugged in and then plug in the type 7, it sees it fine in OpenBSD. It
is the openboot prom that do
Fyi .. there seems to be a lots of Netware for sale on Ebay for some reason.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Sep 9, 2020, at 10:42, Grant Taylor via cctalk
> wrote:
>
> On 9/9/20 5:08 AM, Liam Proven via cctalk wrote:
>> But that's good, isn't it?
>
> Yes and no.
>
> Yes in that it's below the pr
On 9/9/20 12:14 PM, Wayne S wrote:
Fyi .. there seems to be a lots of Netware for sale on Ebay for some reason.
Yep.
I've acquired a number of things therefrom.
Unfortunately, it's quite difficult to tell the difference between
various things. Especially things like which support pack and /
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: cctech On Behalf Of
cctech-requ...@classiccmp.org
Sent: 09 September 2020 18:00
To: cct...@classiccmp.org
Subject: cctech Digest, Vol 72, Issue 9
Send cctech mailing list submissions to
cct...@classiccmp.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the Wor
ons 2020-09-09 klockan 13:08 +0200 skrev Liam Proven via cctalk:
>
> Oh dear...
>
> TBH I have a suspicion nobody may have kept stuff like that, even
> inside Novell... :(
>
I will have to check where i read this just recently but
well the industry is such that repeatibility and possibility to
Date and time of Command.com and any other DOS files will identify the
version number.
On Wed, 9 Sep 2020, Jules Richardson via cctalk wrote:
I've got 11/26/85 on command.com.
That would be MS-DOS version 3.10
Best known for having the "network redirector"? (which was also the
loophole that p
Date and time of Command.com and any other DOS files will identify the
version number.
On Wed, 9 Sep 2020, Liam Proven via cctalk wrote:
Only after DOS 5 or so, I fear.
By lookup of the date prior to 5.00; starting with 5.00, visible instead
of accurate dates
Oh dear, yes. If the machin
Fred Cisin via cctalk:
(...')
> Got an IBM "Advanced Diagnostics" floppy to try?
If you want to do a ll-format, you only need debug:
A>DEBUG
-
-I 322 # reads dip-switches (don't think this is needed)
-I 321 # read status
-O 322 0# select the controller
-I 321 # read status
-O 3
12 matches
Mail list logo
