Johan Helsingius wrote:
> On 06-07-2020 23:54, Grant Taylor via cctalk wrote:
>
> > /Which/ caddie are they? Can we see a picture of them? Both the front
> visible from outside of the system and the connector(s).
>
> Pictures at https://imgur.com/a/iJU6YBH
>
I have a shoe box full of similar
ons 2020-07-08 klockan 20:41 +0200 skrev Johan Helsingius via cctalk:
> On 08-07-2020 12:41, Peter Corlett via cctalk wrote:
>
> > As a guideline, PostNL quote €18.20 (≈USD20.50) fo
>
> Indeed. I too am wondering if i can be bothered. Just don't want to
> recycle
> something someone might use/nee
On Thu, Jul 09, 2020 at 01:24:11PM +0200, Stefan Skoglund via cctalk wrote:
[...]
> Vikt (tittade pga frågan om diskarna på vad frakten från Nederländerna skulle
> kosta dvs ca 250 SEK) ?
According to Google Translate: "how much to Sweden?"
For Sweden specifically, about €10 or SEK100. For Europe
(English at end)
Hej!
> Har du fortfarande kvar några av systemen ?
Ja, en Proliant 6000, en DL380, och en tower-typ maskin med 8 diskplatser
(skall kolla typen senare),
och säkert 20 caddyn och hårdskivor.
> Vikt (tittade pga frågan om diskarna på vad frakten från Nederländerna
> skulle kosta
On Wed, 8 Jul 2020, Peter Corlett via cctalk wrote:
> > If I needed one of those drives, I'd be willing to pay $1 / GB plus shipping
> > and handling if they were known to be good. (If I needed them) I would buy
> > them sight unseen if you ran SpinRite level 2 on the drives and said they
> > pass
I know what you guys are thinking- no, this isn't for a keyboard collection
or some modern build or some other nonsense like that.
I have a friend who is restoring a fairly interesting and historically
significant vintage computer-
The correct SD-series replacement switch would be the 4B3A-
*** T
On 2020-Jul-09, at 9:39 PM, Ian Finder via cctalk wrote:
> I know what you guys are thinking- no, this isn't for a keyboard collection
> or some modern build or some other nonsense like that.
>
> I have a friend who is restoring a fairly interesting and historically
> significant vintage computer
No, as I understand it that is the predecessor
> On Jul 9, 2020, at 21:58, Brent Hilpert wrote:
>
> On 2020-Jul-09, at 9:39 PM, Ian Finder via cctalk wrote:
>
>> I know what you guys are thinking- no, this isn't for a keyboard collection
>> or some modern build or some other nonsense like tha
> On Jul 9, 2020, at 5:02 PM, Robert Armstrong via cctech
> wrote:
> I have an 11/04 with an RK11-D. I have a couple of RK05s, but I wanted to
> test the controller before I start working on the drives. The PDP11
> Diagnostic Handbook says that ZRKJ?? "checks only the drive-independent logi
I have an 11/04 with an RK11-D. I have a couple of RK05s, but I
wanted to test the controller before I start working on the drives. The
PDP11 Diagnostic Handbook says that ZRKJ?? "checks only the
drive-independent logic of the RK11 controller. no drive is needed..."
I assumed that meant it
I know what you guys are thinking- no, this isn't for a keyboard collection
or some modern build or some other nonsense like that.
I have a friend who is restoring a fairly interesting and historically
significant vintage computer- a and subject to what appears to be a
batch-related encapsulation
The error signal was wire-or'ed through up to four drives, so it must be
terminated somewhere - IIRC there was a Unibus terminator in the last
drive, but it has been 45 years since I worked on them, the little grey
cells are fading _\:-)
cheers, Nigel
Nigel Johnson, MSc., MIEEE, VE3ID/G4AJQ/VA3MC
On 7/9/20 7:02 PM, Robert Armstrong via cctech wrote:
I have an 11/04 with an RK11-D. I have a couple of RK05s, but I
wanted to test the controller before I start working on the drives.
The PDP11 Diagnostic Handbook says that ZRKJ?? "checks only the
drive-independent logic of the RK11 contr
13 matches
Mail list logo
