Re: What did computers without screens do?

2015-12-15 Thread Chuck Guzis
On 12/14/2015 04:31 PM, Mike wrote: What would you do with a home no screen computer? I mean what could be done with one that would benefit your work / hobby. I mean NO DISREPECT by asking this question. I saw plenty of early home computers with TTY or Selectric I/O. If you could find a time

Re: What did computers without screens do?

2015-12-15 Thread Tor Arntsen
On 15 December 2015 at 01:31, Mike wrote: > > On 12/14/2015 08:21 PM, Chuck Guzis wrote: >> Personally, I think the world is GUI-addicted. >> >> --Chuck >> > Chuck If I may ask... > > > What would you do with a home no screen computer? I mean what could be > done with one that would benefit you

IBM CMS dumpfile idiocy

2015-12-15 Thread Chuck Guzis
Just finished reading a 9 track tape made with IBM CMS in its dumpfile format. Why on earth--or might I say, what idiot--designed this format? First the file data in a series of records, *then* the file name and other metadata. Anyone know of a DOS/Windows/Unix utility to unravel one of the

Re: Display-less computing

2015-12-15 Thread Chuck Guzis
On 12/14/2015 06:05 PM, Paul Koning wrote: I've only ever seen them called "12" and "11" for the top and next rows respectively. For example, the card code listing on the IBM 360 "green card" shows them that way (e.g., A is 12-1). Same here. But it's not outside the range of possibility that

Re: Mystery IC: Allen Bradley 314B102

2015-12-15 Thread Brent Hilpert
On 2015-Dec-14, at 2:02 PM, Mike Ross wrote: > > - intention was to rip all this out and convert it to a full I/O > serial terminal, using an Arduino-based setup that Lawrence Wilkinson > has already built and tested: > https://www.flickr.com/photos/ljw/sets/72157632841492802/with/9201494189/ > -

Re: PDP 11/05 S vs 11/05 NC

2015-12-15 Thread Mattis Lind
2015-12-15 3:15 GMT+01:00 william degnan : > On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 1:33 PM, Mattis Lind wrote: > > > 2015-12-14 17:12 GMT+01:00 william degnan : > > > > > Just to change the subject.. > > > > > > There were "S" and an "NC" version of 11/05 high profile system. Why? > > > > > > I am curious if

Re: PDP 11/05 S vs 11/05 NC

2015-12-15 Thread Noel Chiappa
> From: William Degnan > *why* did they make these two versions of the high-profile 11/05? > What was one used for vs. the other? *Why did DEC do this*? Check the dates on the machines. I'm pretty sure the -NC is the earlier version, with the bespoke H750 power supply (mounted alongsi

RE: Anyone want a copy of DIGITAL ServerWORKS Manager ?

2015-12-15 Thread Robert Jarratt
> -Original Message- > From: cctalk [mailto:cctalk-boun...@classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Glen Slick > Sent: 14 December 2015 22:33 > To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts > Subject: Anyone want a copy of DIGITAL ServerWORKS Manager ? > > Before I chuck these in the recycle

IBM Selectric-based Terminals

2015-12-15 Thread Paul Birkel
> - intention was to rip all this out and convert it to a full I/O serial > terminal, using an Arduino-based setup > that Lawrence Wilkinson has already built and tested: > https://www.flickr.com/photos/ljw/sets/72157632841492802/with/9201494189/ Looks very nice! Is there documentation f

Re: What did computers without screens do?

2015-12-15 Thread Rod Smallwood
On 15/12/2015 00:31, Mike wrote: On 12/14/2015 08:21 PM, Chuck Guzis wrote: On 12/14/2015 03:53 PM, Jay West wrote: In any case... early computers without screens weren't necessarily so "early" in the scheme of things, and often did process control and test & measurement :) The IBM 1710 di

Re: Mystery IC: Allen Bradley 314B102

2015-12-15 Thread Mike Ross
Solder side pic sent to your email! Thanks! On Dec 16, 2015 2:22 AM, "Brent Hilpert" wrote: > On 2015-Dec-14, at 2:02 PM, Mike Ross wrote: > > > > - intention was to rip all this out and convert it to a full I/O > > serial terminal, using an Arduino-based setup that Lawrence Wilkinson > > has alr

Re: PDP 11/05 S vs 11/05 NC

2015-12-15 Thread william degnan
> > > > Yes, and my guess that they are of different vintage. The BA11-D is the > older box used for the NC and the BA11-K is the more modern box used for > the S model. Over the years the memory requirements increased and thus they > had to increase the density. > > I think the NC/ND models are th

Re: Re-inking printer ribbons

2015-12-15 Thread Mike
On 12/14/2015 08:13 PM, Jason Howe wrote: > On 12/13/2015 10:17 AM, william degnan wrote: >> I have found that most vintage ribbons can be replaced with new >> ribbons for >> new devices. Worst case you may find the right width but you'll have to >> re-thread to fit the vintage spindle. Just ha

Re: IBM Selectric-based Terminals

2015-12-15 Thread Paul Berger
On 2015-12-15 1:54 AM, Paul Birkel wrote: Looks very nice! Is there documentation for it somewhere? I also have a Selectric (unfortunately it's located distant from me at the moment so I can't provide particulars) that I worked on interfacing to a micro in the mid-70's. I was using a MC6800 in

Re: IBM Selectric-based Terminals

2015-12-15 Thread Paul Koning
> On Dec 15, 2015, at 12:54 AM, Paul Birkel wrote: > ... > I believe that the Selectric came configured for remote operation, but > presumably using an EBCDIC-based data stream. I vaguely recall a DB-50 > connector, but it's been an awfully long time ... > > Does this description sound famili

RE: Display-less computing

2015-12-15 Thread Dave Wade
> -Original Message- > From: cctalk [mailto:cctalk-boun...@classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Chuck > Guzis > Sent: 15 December 2015 05:37 > To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts > > Subject: Re: Display-less computing > > On 12/14/2015 06:05 PM, Paul Koning wrote: > > > I've on

RE: IBM CMS dumpfile idiocy

2015-12-15 Thread Dave Wade
> -Original Message- > From: cctalk [mailto:cctalk-boun...@classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Chuck > Guzis > Sent: 15 December 2015 06:21 > To: CCtalk > Subject: IBM CMS dumpfile idiocy > > Just finished reading a 9 track tape made with IBM CMS in its dumpfile > format. > > Why on earth--or m

RE: Mystery IC: Allen Bradley 314B102

2015-12-15 Thread tony duell
> > I guessed that might be the case... any suggestions for what were > common pinouts and signals used? I can analyze 'backwards', testing There were just about as many parallel interface versions as devices that used them back then. Nothing 'common' really... The idea of 7 or 8 data lines,

RE: Mystery IC: Allen Bradley 314B102

2015-12-15 Thread tony duell
> > > Well, 19 could be a general printer-ready pin in that if the paper runs > > out it would say the printer is not ready for another character but > > it might well also be put to the not-ready state when the printer > > was printing the current character. Seen that before. > > Maybe, but Sele

RE: Display-less computing

2015-12-15 Thread Fred Cisin
I've only ever seen them called "12" and "11" for the top and next rows respectively. For example, the card code listing on the IBM 360 "green card" shows them that way (e.g., A is 12-1). Same here. But it's not outside the range of possibility that *someone* called them X and Y, although I don

Re: What did computers without screens do?

2015-12-15 Thread Fred Cisin
What would you do with a home no screen computer? I mean what could be done with one that would benefit your work / hobby. I mean NO DISREPECT by asking this question. Use the lights. Wish for a teletype Buy Don Lancaster's books (How many copies did he sell?) Not having a screen made it a li

Re: Mystery IC: Allen Bradley 314B102

2015-12-15 Thread Mouse
>> [T]here's a whole lot of potential 'no, wait, I'm not ready!' >> conditions. Would they all be ORed onto one pin? > Why not? It's all the host really needs to know -- can I send > another character or not. Well...it can be very nice for the host to report "out of paper" differently from "pape

Re: IBM Selectric-based Terminals

2015-12-15 Thread Paul Berger
On 2015-12-15 11:27 AM, Paul Koning wrote: On Dec 15, 2015, at 12:54 AM, Paul Birkel wrote: ... I believe that the Selectric came configured for remote operation, but presumably using an EBCDIC-based data stream. I vaguely recall a DB-50 connector, but it's been an awfully long time ... Does

Re: IBM CMS dumpfile idiocy

2015-12-15 Thread Guy Sotomayor
> On Dec 14, 2015, at 10:21 PM, Chuck Guzis wrote: > > Just finished reading a 9 track tape made with IBM CMS in its dumpfile format. > > Why on earth--or might I say, what idiot--designed this format? First the > file data in a series of records, *then* the file name and other metadata. > >

Re: IBM CMS dumpfile idiocy

2015-12-15 Thread Chuck Guzis
On 12/15/2015 07:37 AM, Dave Wade wrote: The files are in the same format as on disk. The system just copies them back to disk. What size are the blocks as I have a "C" utility that will read the older smaller block size files. You can always download Hercules and VM/370 Jim, Dave, Peter,

Re: What did computers without screens do?

2015-12-15 Thread Jon Elson
On 12/14/2015 06:31 PM, Mike wrote: What would you do with a home no screen computer? I mean what could be done with one that would benefit your work / hobby. I mean NO DISREPECT by asking this question. Well, that would severely limit things. But, it could still be useful. I have one a

Re: Making a serial board for Briel Altair Micro

2015-12-15 Thread dwight
Needs some more for the read and write controls. Is the address latched from the altairmicro? if not you'll need a latch using the ALE. You need to add a read port for the various status bits. Dwight From: cctalk on behalf of d...@661.org Sent: Sunday,

RE:Mystery IC: Allen Bradley 314B102

2015-12-15 Thread GerardCJAT
HI, I would take the bet that this IC is simply a R network, 1 KOhm, 1 resistor "across" ie from pin 1 to opposite pin, from pin 2 to opposite pin, etc What about simple and quick Ohmmeter check ?? --- L'absence de virus dans ce courrier électronique a été vérifiée par le logiciel antivi

Re: Mystery IC: Allen Bradley 314B102

2015-12-15 Thread Chuck Guzis
On 12/15/2015 10:34 AM, GerardCJAT wrote: I would take the bet that this IC is simply a R network, 1 KOhm, 1 resistor "across" ie from pin 1 to opposite pin, from pin 2 to opposite pin, etc What about simple and quick Ohmmeter check ?? That was my first guess--the numbering matches th

Rectangular holes punched from cards [was RE: Display-less computing]

2015-12-15 Thread Rich Alderson
From: Fred Cisin Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2015 9:12 AM > My father claimed that the use of round holes on divergent cards was due > to an attempt by IBM to patent the shape of the hole in the cards. http://www-03.ibm.com/ibm/history/ibm100/us/en/icons/punchcard/ Prior to 1928, the holes in I

RE: Mystery IC: Allen Bradley 314B102

2015-12-15 Thread tony duell
[Printer's Ready signal] > > Why not? It's all the host really needs to know -- can I send > > another character or not. > > Well...it can be very nice for the host to report "out of paper" > differently from "paper jam" differently from "motor or position > encoder failure" differently from "fa

Re: IBM Selectric-based Terminals

2015-12-15 Thread Mike Ross
On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 4:27 AM, Paul Koning wrote: > >> On Dec 15, 2015, at 12:54 AM, Paul Birkel wrote: >> ... >> I believe that the Selectric came configured for remote operation, but >> presumably using an EBCDIC-based data stream. I vaguely recall a DB-50 >> connector, but it's been an aw

Re: IBM Selectric-based Terminals

2015-12-15 Thread Guy Sotomayor
On 12/15/15 12:05 PM, Mike Ross wrote: What other OSes might have native 2741 support built in, anyone know? I would expect that IBM mainframe OS's would support it (especially older ones). The issue there would be getting the 2741 connected up. I have a DECWriter III with the APL option on

Re: Anyone want a copy of DIGITAL ServerWORKS Manager ?

2015-12-15 Thread Glen Slick
On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 10:49 PM, Robert Jarratt wrote: > >> I have two boxes, QB-4QYAA-SA 3.2 sealed in shrink wrap, and QB-4QYAA-SA >> 3.3 open box that is slightly crushed. >> >> The boxes (at least the still sealed one) look like this eBay item (not mine) >> listing: >> http://www.ebay.com/itm

RE: VAX 4000-500 PSU Overload?

2015-12-15 Thread Robert Jarratt
> -Original Message- > From: cctalk [mailto:cctalk-boun...@classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Robert > Jarratt > Sent: 13 December 2015 15:47 > To: 'General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts' > Subject: RE: VAX 4000-500 PSU Overload? > > > > > I have been able to remove the leaking o

WTB: PDP-11/03 front bezel

2015-12-15 Thread Pontus Pihlgren
Hi It's a longshot. But recently I aquired two BA11-N. One is just the cage and power supply. Looks just like this: http://www.ricomputermuseum.org/_/rsrc/1300059803599/Home/equipment/dec-pdp-11-03/DEC_PDP-11_03-inside.jpg The other came with mounting box but no front panel. I would like to ma

Re: Accessible Computing

2015-12-15 Thread Tomasz Rola
On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 09:20:35PM +0100, Tomasz Rola wrote: [...] > Now, the funny stuff: I try "print preview" in Firefox and it shows me > sixty three pages, because, you know, apart from the original article > I was interested in there is a side frame with about twenty (forty?) > others and for

Re: Mystery IC: Allen Bradley 314B102

2015-12-15 Thread Mike Ross
On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 4:35 AM, tony duell wrote: >> >> I guessed that might be the case... any suggestions for what were >> common pinouts and signals used? I can analyze 'backwards', testing > > There were just about as many parallel interface versions as devices > that used them back then.

Re: Accessible Computing

2015-12-15 Thread Tomasz Rola
On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 01:18:01PM -0800, Chuck Guzis wrote: [...] > > I've tried reading my email using text-to-speech software and felt > like I wanted to throw the damned machine out the window. I wonder how tts would manage with a website like nasa.gov ... Some time ago they became javascript

Re: IBM Selectric-based Terminals

2015-12-15 Thread Christian Gauger-Cosgrove
On 15 December 2015 at 15:05, Mike Ross wrote: > What other OSes might have native 2741 support built in, anyone know? > I might be completely wrong, but I think some of the early UNIX versions might "speak" 2741. But I'm not sure. Perhaps a sufficiently "vintage" RSX-11 might as well? Of course

RE: IBM Selectric-based Terminals

2015-12-15 Thread Dave Wade
> -Original Message- > From: cctalk [mailto:cctalk-boun...@classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Guy > Sotomayor > Sent: 15 December 2015 20:26 > To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts > > Subject: Re: IBM Selectric-based Terminals > > > > On 12/15/15 12:05 PM, Mike Ross wrote: > >

RE: VAX 4000-500 PSU Overload?

2015-12-15 Thread Robert Jarratt
> Tonight I replaced the leaking capacitors on the +12V/-12V board, and also > replaced the two similar ones that looked and measured fine. I put the PSU > back together, put in a couple of less important boards and drives, and the > machine now seems to power on OK. I measured the ripple using the

Re: IBM Selectric-based Terminals

2015-12-15 Thread Mike Ross
On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 9:26 AM, Guy Sotomayor wrote: > > > On 12/15/15 12:05 PM, Mike Ross wrote: >> >> What other OSes might have native 2741 support built in, anyone know? > > I would expect that IBM mainframe OS's would support it (especially older > ones). The issue there would be getting th

RE: IBM CMS dumpfile idiocy

2015-12-15 Thread Dave Wade
What I meant was are they still on 9-track, or some kind of tape-in-a-file disk? IBM tapes are usually written to AWS format files not the formats (.TAP ?) used by SIMH... Some source to extract some versions of these from AWS files (and windows executables) are in this ZIP file:- http://1drv.

Re: VAX 4000-500 PSU Overload?

2015-12-15 Thread Glen Slick
On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 12:38 PM, Robert Jarratt wrote: > > Tonight I replaced the leaking capacitors on the +12V/-12V board, and also > replaced the two similar ones that looked and measured fine. I put the PSU > back together, put in a couple of less important boards and drives, and the > machin

RE: IBM CMS dumpfile idiocy

2015-12-15 Thread Dave Wade
> -Original Message- > From: cctalk [mailto:cctalk-boun...@classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Guy > Sotomayor > Sent: 15 December 2015 17:09 > To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts > > Subject: Re: IBM CMS dumpfile idiocy > > > > On Dec 14, 2015, at 10:21 PM, Chuck Guzis wrote:

Re: Mystery IC: Allen Bradley 314B102

2015-12-15 Thread Mike Stein
- Original Message - From: "Mike Ross" Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2015 3:41 PM > On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 4:35 AM, tony duell wrote: >> If you can identify the data lines on the connector you are getting there. >> See if you >> can trace the other pins to inputs or outputs. >> >> -ton

Re: Anyone want a copy of DIGITAL ServerWORKS Manager ?

2015-12-15 Thread Jason T
On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 2:43 PM, Glen Slick wrote: > The main manual is already available online. I could image the CD-ROMs > from both boxes (not sure if they are actually different between the > two) and make that available to archive if it is not already archived > somewhere so nothing would be

Re: WTB: PDP-11/03 front bezel

2015-12-15 Thread steven
> Hi > > It's a longshot. But recently I aquired two BA11-N. One is just the cage > and power supply. Looks just like this: > > http://www.ricomputermuseum.org/_/rsrc/1300059803599/Home/equipment/dec-pdp-11-03/DEC_PDP-11_03-inside.jpg > > The other came with mounting box but no front panel. I would

Re: WTB: PDP-11/03 front bezel

2015-12-15 Thread Paul Anderson
I think that is a BA11-M in the picture. The M parts are easier to find. On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 2:48 PM, Pontus Pihlgren wrote: > Hi > > It's a longshot. But recently I aquired two BA11-N. One is just the cage > and power supply. Looks just like this: > > > http://www.ricomputermuseum.org/_/rsr

Re: WTB: PDP-11/03 front bezel

2015-12-15 Thread Paul Anderson
opps... The "N" parts are easier to find. On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 5:49 PM, Paul Anderson wrote: > I think that is a BA11-M in the picture. The M parts are easier to find. > > On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 2:48 PM, Pontus Pihlgren > wrote: > >> Hi >> >> It's a longshot. But recently I aquired two BA11

Re: IBM Selectric-based Terminals

2015-12-15 Thread William Donzelli
DEC made a Selectric interface called LT33 or something, consisting of a general purpose parallel card for a PDP-8/E coupled to a small chassis with a bunch of solenoid drivers and stuff for the Selectric. I think it was a CSS product, so I doubt it was supported by any official OS. I have three o

Re: IBM Selectric-based Terminals

2015-12-15 Thread Christian Gauger-Cosgrove
On 15 December 2015 at 20:21, William Donzelli wrote: > DEC made a Selectric interface called LT33 or something, consisting of If I recall my DEC naming correctly, the LT33 is *not* for the Selectric. It (and the corresponding LT35) are the modifications made to private line Model 33 (and Model 35

Re: IBM Selectric-based Terminals

2015-12-15 Thread Mike Ross
On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 10:50 AM, Dave Wade wrote: >> -Original Message- >> From: cctalk [mailto:cctalk-boun...@classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Guy >> Sotomayor >> Sent: 15 December 2015 20:26 >> To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts >> >> Subject: Re: IBM Selectric-based Term

Re: IBM CMS dumpfile idiocy

2015-12-15 Thread Chuck Guzis
On 12/15/2015 01:48 PM, Dave Wade wrote: What I meant was are they still on 9-track, or some kind of tape-in-a-file disk? IBM tapes are usually written to AWS format files not the formats (.TAP ?) used by SIMH... Some source to extract some versions of these from AWS files (and windows executable

Re: Mystery IC: Allen Bradley 314B102

2015-12-15 Thread Mike Ross
On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 11:43 AM, Mike Stein wrote: > - Original Message - > From: "Mike Ross" > Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2015 3:41 PM > > >> On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 4:35 AM, tony duell wrote: >>> If you can identify the data lines on the connector you are getting there. >>> See if y

Re: IBM Selectric-based Terminals

2015-12-15 Thread William Donzelli
Like I said "or something". I could not recall that the time. A quick look shows that it is actually LT73. -- Will On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 9:13 PM, Christian Gauger-Cosgrove wrote: > On 15 December 2015 at 20:21, William Donzelli wrote: >> DEC made a Selectric interface called LT33 or somethin