Re: cctalk Digest, Vol 70, Issue 22

2020-07-23 Thread Grant Taylor via cctalk
On 7/23/20 1:59 PM, Adam Thornton via cctalk wrote: But I've been known to do silly emulation tricks too: https://www.fsf.net/~adam/NT-on-390-desktop.png I'm curious what you're doing there. Is that an X3270 session to a physical mainframe running bochs in OMVS / USS? Or is it a mainframe

Re: cctalk Digest, Vol 70, Issue 22

2020-07-23 Thread Adam Thornton via cctalk
:38 PM, David Gesswein via cctech wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 05:12:10PM -0400, Chris Zach wrote: > >> Working on it. Question: Was the 67mb drive in a 7300/3B1 a miniscribe > 6085? > >> > > Yes it was. http://www.pdp8online.com/3b1/drive.shtml > > > > > -- > > Message: 18 > Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2020 23:32:41 -0600 > From: Grant Taylor > To: cctalk@classiccmp.org > Subject: Re: Adventures online > Message-ID: > <35e88690-9ada-e57b-281e-cbfdbfc54...@gtaylor.tnetconsulting.net> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed > > On 7/22/20 8:35 PM, Doug Jackson via cctalk wrote: > > Sadly, the original tweet doesn't mention what mainframe - Somebody > > did ask, and there was no response I could see. > > I asked @bmoshix what the system was. I've not gotten a reply yet. > > > The error messages suggest it's some sort of Linux system using Docker > > containers, so it's not OS/360 :-) > > I half way expect that it's Docker running on z/OS. > > > I suspect given that it's running out of memory, that it's yet another > > linux box. > > It could be Docker on Linux on Z, but I'd be mildly surprised by that. > I doubt it's Linux on a more typical system. Though the following file > name in the dump makes me think it's AMD-64 architecture. > > /usr/local/go/src/runtime/asm_amd64.s > > > > -- > Grant. . . . > unix || die > > > -- > > Message: 19 > Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2020 22:39:20 +0800 > From: Tom Hunter > To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts" > > Subject: Altair 8800 reproduction > Message-ID: > woriqxevzuwg4nyum7...@mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" > > About 10 years ago Grant Stockly in Anchorage Alaska produced high quality > MITS Altair 8800 reproductions in kit form. The website still exists: > http://www.altairkit.com/ > > I have tried to contact Grant but did not get a reply. Does anyone know if > these kits are still available? Is Grant on this forum? > > Alternatively is somebody else making complete Altair 8800 kits? I have > found people making individual boards but not a complete kit. > > There is also the Altair 8800 clone which is based on a PIC microcontroller > emulating the entire original Altair 8800. It is cute but not the real > thing. > > Thanks > Tom Hunter > > > -- > > Message: 20 > Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2020 11:09:14 -0400 > From: Bill Degnan > To: Tom Hunter , "General Discussion: On-Topic > and Off-Topic Posts" > Subject: Re: Altair 8800 reproduction > Message-ID: > z2vk7q0+xrghfod8h-...@mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" > > This comes up from time to time, I don't believe he is making any more > kits. I have not heard from him for a while. > Bill > > On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 10:39 AM Tom Hunter via cctalk < > cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote: > > > About 10 years ago Grant Stockly in Anchorage Alaska produced high > quality > > MITS Altair 8800 reproductions in kit form. The website still exists: > > http://www.altairkit.com/ > > > > I have tried to contact Grant but did not get a reply. Does anyone know > if > > these kits are still available? Is Grant on this forum? > > > > Alternatively is somebody else making complete Altair 8800 kits? I have > > found people making individual boards but not a complete kit. > > > > There is also the Altair 8800 clone which is based on a PIC > microcontroller > > emulating the entire original Altair 8800. It is cute but not the real > > thing. > > > > Thanks > > Tom Hunter > > > > > -- > > Message: 21 > Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2020 10:32:42 -0600 > From: Grant Taylor > To: cctalk@classiccmp.org > Subject: Re: Adventures online > Message-ID: > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed > > On 7/22/20 11:32 PM, Grant Taylor wrote: > > I asked @bmoshix what the system was.? I've not gotten a reply yet. > > @bmoshix replied that it's Linux running on a mainframe. > > > I half way expect that it's Docker running on z/OS. > > So, apparently not Docker running on z/OS. > > > It could be Docker on Linux on Z, but I'd be mildly surprised by that. > > I'm mildly surprised. > > > I doubt it's Linux on a more typical system. Though the following > > file name in the dump makes me think it's AMD-64 architecture. > > > > /usr/local/go/src/runtime/asm_amd64.s > > Now I'm more confused as to why asm_amd64.s, something I assume is > related to x86_64 ~> PC (compatible) is being used. > > I wonder if the copies of the games that @bmoshix is running were > written for a mainframe or a PC (compatible). The latter makes more > sense with the asm_amd64.s and comments about installing these games on > a PC. > > > > -- > Grant. . . . > unix || die > > > End of cctalk Digest, Vol 70, Issue 22 > ** >