I have an original papertape distribution for a DEC 11/20 circa 1970.
I have dumped all of the media and the paper tapes can be found at:
http://iamvirtual.ca/collection/systems/mediadoc/mediadoc.html#papertape
--barrym
On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 3:56 PM, Al Kossow wrote:
> On 11/10/15 2:10 PM,
On 11/10/15 7:42 PM, Josh Dersch wrote:
On 11/10/15 2:10 PM, Jay Jaeger wrote:
JRJ
The diagnostic listing is now available in my new bitsavers-contrib
folder on Google drive:
https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=0B2v4WRwISEQRWWFFdVpCZWFTZEU&usp=sharing
This is the only document
On 11/10/15 2:10 PM, Jay Jaeger wrote:
On 11/9/2015 3:42 PM, Josh Dersch wrote:
On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 12:37 PM, Jay Jaeger wrote:
On 11/8/2015 11:50 AM, Josh Dersch wrote:
Anyone have any experience with this particular diagnostic?
Thanks,
Josh
The version can normally be identified ei
>Al Kossow wrote:
>On 11/10/15 2:10 PM, Jay Jaeger wrote:
A PDF is there as well as a zip file containing the original .tif files
as Al Kossow prefers for submissions. (Al: Hint, Hint ;) ).
Thanks! Just send me an email as you add things, and I will pick them up.
I also notice that the
On 11/10/15 2:10 PM, Jay Jaeger wrote:
A PDF is there as well as a zip file containing the original .tif files
as Al Kossow prefers for submissions. (Al: Hint, Hint ;) ).
Thanks! Just send me an email as you add things, and I will pick them up.
On 11/9/2015 3:42 PM, Josh Dersch wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 12:37 PM, Jay Jaeger wrote:
>
>> On 11/8/2015 11:50 AM, Josh Dersch wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Anyone have any experience with this particular diagnostic?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Josh
>>>
>>
>> The version can normally be identified either by
On 09/11/2015 21:42, Josh Dersch wrote:
Thanks, I should have thought to check the revision codes in the first
place. Looks like the Bitsavers docs are from revision C; I've been
running the paper-tape version that's on Bitsavers (
http://bitsavers.informatik.uni-stuttgart.de/bits/DEC/pdp11/pap
On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 12:37 PM, Jay Jaeger wrote:
> On 11/8/2015 11:50 AM, Josh Dersch wrote:
>
> >
> > Anyone have any experience with this particular diagnostic?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Josh
> >
>
> The version can normally be identified either by the file name or on the
> paper tape if you are us
On 11/8/2015 11:50 AM, Josh Dersch wrote:
> Hi all -
>
> As noted in a mail last week, I now have my PDP-11/05 running with working
> core (8KW). I had some time last night to try loading in some "real"
> software, and I started with the PDP-11 paper-tape BASIC, which I've
> successfully loaded i
On Sun, Nov 8, 2015 at 12:50 PM, Josh Dersch wrote:
> Hi all -
>
> As noted in a mail last week, I now have my PDP-11/05 running with working
> core (8KW). I had some time last night to try loading in some "real"
> software, and I started with the PDP-11 paper-tape BASIC, which I've
> successful
Hi all -
As noted in a mail last week, I now have my PDP-11/05 running with working
core (8KW). I had some time last night to try loading in some "real"
software, and I started with the PDP-11 paper-tape BASIC, which I've
successfully loaded into memory (in theory). At this point, it became
clea
11 matches
Mail list logo
