Re: Unsubscribed from the list due to too many bounces

2022-05-17 Thread Curious Marc via cctalk
one > thread "Cctalk subscription disabled" > > > > > >> On Tue, May 17, 2022 at 10:26 PM Curious Marc via cctalk >> wrote: >> I have been auto-rejected from the list again, due to too many bounces, >> whatever this means. But I swear I have

Re: Unsubscribed from the list due to too many bounces

2022-05-17 Thread Adrian Stoness via cctalk
wrote: > I have been auto-rejected from the list again, due to too many bounces, > whatever this means. But I swear I have been a good boy and did not bounce > too much! This is a plain vanilla gmail account by the way. Does anyone > have any idea why this keeps happening? Anything I can do about it? > Marc

Unsubscribed from the list due to too many bounces

2022-05-17 Thread Curious Marc via cctalk
I have been auto-rejected from the list again, due to too many bounces, whatever this means. But I swear I have been a good boy and did not bounce too much! This is a plain vanilla gmail account by the way. Does anyone have any idea why this keeps happening? Anything I can do about it? Marc

Re: Bounces

2021-05-01 Thread Tony Duell via cctalk
On Sat, May 1, 2021 at 4:02 PM Lawrence Wilkinson via cctalk wrote: > > > On 1/05/21 4:00 pm, Adrian Graham via cctalk wrote: > > Hi folks, > > > > Did anyone else get an email about excessive bounces today? I’ve not > > changed anything hosting wise forever so t

Re: Bounces

2021-05-01 Thread Lawrence Wilkinson via cctalk
On 1/05/21 4:00 pm, Adrian Graham via cctalk wrote: Hi folks, Did anyone else get an email about excessive bounces today? I’ve not changed anything hosting wise forever so this is a bit weird. Cheers, There was a bounce from gmail - something about some of the messages it didn't lik

Re: Bounces

2021-05-01 Thread Bill Degnan via cctalk
On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts < > cctalk@classiccmp.org> > Subject: Bounces > > Hi folks, > > Did anyone else get an email about excessive bounces today? I’ve not > changed anything hosting wise forever so this is a bit weird. > > Cheers, > > -- > Adrian Gr

Re: Bounces

2021-05-01 Thread Ray Jewhurst via cctalk
Adrian Graham via cctalk Sent: Saturday, May 1, 2021 10:00:24 AM To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts Subject: Bounces Hi folks, Did anyone else get an email about excessive bounces today? I’ve not changed anything hosting wise forever so this is a bit weird. Cheers, -- Adrian

Bounces

2021-05-01 Thread Adrian Graham via cctalk
Hi folks, Did anyone else get an email about excessive bounces today? I’ve not changed anything hosting wise forever so this is a bit weird. Cheers, -- Adrian Graham Owner of Binary Dinosaurs, the UK's biggest private home computer collection? t: @binarydinosaursf: faceboo

Re: Membership disabled due to bounces

2016-11-25 Thread Mouse
> This is why people use Gmail, it filters spam and trash like no other Maybe for the people whose eyeballs it's selling. My view as someone who doesn't use it is that it's a bulletproof spammer drop-box hosting service crossed with a spam spewer. Their offloading the costs of their antisocial b

Re: Membership disabled due to bounces

2016-11-25 Thread allison
As someone that has several Gmail and Verizon accounts my call is: AOL is often either put in junk or trash for all all. Often that includes Yahoo as well. I suspect its the general drift to better authentication to slow the junkmail and spoofed emails. This is why people use Gmail, it filters

Re: Membership disabled due to bounces

2016-11-24 Thread jim stephens
From chocolate... "Gmail is only the single most reliable mail provider in the world, and bounces never happen." On 11/23/2016 5:02 PM, Cameron Kaiser wrote: >Do we have any evidence that his messages are affecting the rest of us, >though? The thread about email to AOL is not

Re: Membership disabled due to bounces

2016-11-24 Thread Richard Loken
On Thu, 24 Nov 2016, Graham Toal wrote: Not so. By doing nothing (ie NOT creating an SPF record for the sending domain) you pretty much guarantee a lack of problems. (At least, these specific problems). It's the smart aleck admins who do create SPF records etc who cause the problems, in conjun

Re: Membership disabled due to bounces

2016-11-24 Thread John H. Reinhardt
On 11/24/2016 12:20 PM, Eric Christopherson wrote: What's a bounce score, and how do you know what yours is and what the limit is? Does classiccmp specify 5.0, or Yahoo, or what? When you get the message saying you have been disabled, it contains two links. One is the link to re-enable yo

Re: Membership disabled due to bounces

2016-11-24 Thread Eric Christopherson
On Nov 23, 2016 11:05 PM, "John H. Reinhardt" wrote: > > > On 11/23/2016 8:00 PM, Eric Christopherson wrote: >> >> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016, Michael Brutman wrote: >>> >>> Gmail routinely marks these emails as spam. And Gmail clearly says: " It >>> has a from address in aol.com but has failed aol.com

Re: Membership disabled due to bounces

2016-11-23 Thread Graham Toal
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 11:43 PM, Richard Loken wrote: > On Thu, 24 Nov 2016, John H. Reinhardt wrote: > > I was thinking of changing my email to another provider even though I've >> had this one for at least 12 years. But if it's because of a configuration >> problem, then other providers may r

Re: Membership disabled due to bounces

2016-11-23 Thread Richard Loken
On Thu, 24 Nov 2016, John H. Reinhardt wrote: I was thinking of changing my email to another provider even though I've had this one for at least 12 years. But if it's because of a configuration problem, then other providers may react the same way so will it do any good? I doubt that changing

Re: Membership disabled due to bounces

2016-11-23 Thread COURYHOUSE
seems odd some list serves have this problem and some do not out there... which would suggest it may be a matter of the way the listserv is configured. I hear people with yahoo mail complain about some list serves but they also say some cause no problem at all. Most of it is a

Re: Membership disabled due to bounces

2016-11-23 Thread John H. Reinhardt
On 11/23/2016 8:00 PM, Eric Christopherson wrote: On Wed, Nov 23, 2016, Michael Brutman wrote: Gmail routinely marks these emails as spam. And Gmail clearly says: " It has a from address in aol.com but has failed aol.com's required tests for authentication." Digging deeper into the header one

Re: Membership disabled due to bounces

2016-11-23 Thread Sam O'nella
Ditto although my timing was odd and I may have gotten the notice prior to replying.  I emailed Jay off list but understandably he should be having some family time during this holiday break and not having to worry about us right now :-) Hopefully there's a log or something noting what the mail

Re: Membership disabled due to bounces

2016-11-23 Thread Adrian Stoness
Weird I got one of these notices today when I replayed to a thread On Nov 23, 2016 7:02 PM, "Cameron Kaiser" wrote: > > > Gmail routinely marks these emails as spam. And Gmail clearly says: " > It > > > has a from address in aol.com but has failed aol.com's required tests > for > > > authentica

Re: Membership disabled due to bounces

2016-11-23 Thread Cameron Kaiser
> > Gmail routinely marks these emails as spam. And Gmail clearly says: " It > > has a from address in aol.com but has failed aol.com's required tests for > > authentication." > > > > Digging deeper into the header one finds: > > > > "Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain

Re: Membership disabled due to bounces

2016-11-23 Thread Eric Christopherson
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016, Michael Brutman wrote: > Gmail routinely marks these emails as spam. And Gmail clearly says: " It > has a from address in aol.com but has failed aol.com's required tests for > authentication." > > Digging deeper into the header one finds: > > "Received-SPF: pass (google.com

Re: Membership disabled due to bounces

2016-11-23 Thread Graham Toal
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 6:55 PM, Michael Brutman wrote: > Gmail routinely marks these emails as spam. And Gmail clearly says: " It > has a from address in aol.com but has failed aol.com's required tests for > authentication." > > Digging deeper into the header one finds: > > "Received-SPF: pass

Re: Membership disabled due to bounces

2016-11-23 Thread Michael Brutman
Gmail routinely marks these emails as spam. And Gmail clearly says: " It has a from address in aol.com but has failed aol.com's required tests for authentication." Digging deeper into the header one finds: "Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of cctalk-boun...@classiccmp

Re: Membership disabled due to bounces

2016-11-23 Thread geneb
On Wed, 23 Nov 2016, chocolatejolli...@gmail.com wrote: Gmail is only the single most reliable mail provider in the world, and bounces never happen. Is anybody ever going to fix this brain dead, bone headed bug, or can we expect to continue getting memberships disabled every couple of weeks

Re: Membership disabled due to bounces

2016-11-23 Thread Graham Toal
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 5:54 PM, Fred Cisin wrote: > Gmail is only the single most reliable mail provider in the world, and >>>> bounces never happen. Is anybody ever going to fix this brain dead, bone >>>> headed bug, or can we expect to continue getting memberships

Re: Membership disabled due to bounces

2016-11-23 Thread COURYHOUSE
no the only one that gets bounced is me. and I have to re enable it every so often not a lot though just sometimes In a message dated 11/23/2016 4:57:44 P.M. US Mountain Standard Time, charles.unix@gmail.com writes: On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 3:54 PM, Fred Cisin wrote:

Re: Membership disabled due to bounces

2016-11-23 Thread Charles Anthony
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 3:54 PM, Fred Cisin wrote: > On Wed, 23 Nov 2016, Ian Finder wrote: > >> Not an expert on mailing lists, but I wonder if the fact that gmail always >> puts COURYHOUSE into the spam folder due to AOL weirdness is the signal >> source for the bounce? >> > > ^^^ Mis-att

Re: Membership disabled due to bounces

2016-11-23 Thread Fred Cisin
Gmail is only the single most reliable mail provider in the world, and bounces never happen. Is anybody ever going to fix this brain dead, bone headed bug, or can we expect to continue getting memberships disabled every couple of weeks? On Wed, 23 Nov 2016, Ian Finder wrote: Not an expert on

Re: Membership disabled due to bounces

2016-11-23 Thread Mouse
g to (by implication) say Jay's system is lying about seeing bounces, maybe you'd be happier just unsubbing? I long ago configured my mailer to silently drop mail from classiccmp lists it would normally bounce (such as mail claiming to be 8859-1 but containing octets outside the 8859-1 printable

RE: Membership disabled due to bounces

2016-11-23 Thread Rob Jarratt
> -Original Message- > From: cctalk [mailto:cctalk-boun...@classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Ian Finder > Sent: 23 November 2016 23:10 > To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts > > Subject: Re: Membership disabled due to bounces > > +1 - this is getting s

Re: Membership disabled due to bounces

2016-11-23 Thread Ian Finder
+1 - this is getting stupid. 4th time I've had to sign up again... On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 14:45 Charles Anthony wrote: > On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 2:39 PM, wrote: > > > Gmail is only the single most reliable mail provider in the world, and > > bounces never happen. Is an

Re: Membership disabled due to bounces

2016-11-23 Thread Charles Anthony
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 2:39 PM, wrote: > Gmail is only the single most reliable mail provider in the world, and > bounces never happen. Is anybody ever going to fix this brain dead, bone > headed bug, or can we expect to continue getting memberships disabled every > couple of weeks

Membership disabled due to bounces

2016-11-23 Thread chocolatejollis38
Gmail is only the single most reliable mail provider in the world, and bounces never happen. Is anybody ever going to fix this brain dead, bone headed bug, or can we expect to continue getting memberships disabled every couple of weeks?

Re: 'Bounces'

2016-07-10 Thread Mouse
> Just re-subscribed to cc-talk. I'm wondering if anyone has an answer > on this - every now and again I get these warning emails about > 'excessive bounces'. I have to click a link and then they go away > for a while. But sometimes I get busy and forget.. and then

Re: 'Bounces'

2016-07-10 Thread Jules Richardson
On 07/10/2016 02:48 PM, couryho...@aol.com wrote: I just resubmit each time and check the archive in case I missed something. works ok this way. never missed anything life changing. That's reassuring - my classiccmp folder now has 47,029 unread messages and I'm starting to think that I'm ne

Re: 'Bounces'

2016-07-10 Thread COURYHOUSE
; From: cctalk [mailto:cctalk-boun...@classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Brad H > Sent: 10 July 2016 19:34 > To: 'General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts' > > Subject: 'Bounces' > > Just re-subscribed to cc-talk. I'm wondering if anyone has an a

RE: 'Bounces'

2016-07-10 Thread Rob Jarratt
> -Original Message- > From: cctalk [mailto:cctalk-boun...@classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Brad H > Sent: 10 July 2016 19:34 > To: 'General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts' > > Subject: 'Bounces' > > Just re-subscribed to cc-talk. I

Re: 'Bounces'

2016-07-10 Thread COURYHOUSE
nyone has an answer on this - every now and again I get these warning emails about 'excessive bounces'. I have to click a link and then they go away for a while. But sometimes I get busy and forget.. and then the list unsubscribes me. No idea what 'excessive bounces' m

'Bounces'

2016-07-10 Thread Brad H
Just re-subscribed to cc-talk. I'm wondering if anyone has an answer on this - every now and again I get these warning emails about 'excessive bounces'. I have to click a link and then they go away for a while. But sometimes I get busy and forget.. and then the list unsubscrib

Re: Excessive Bounces

2016-07-02 Thread Lyndon Nerenberg
> On Jul 2, 2016, at 2:37 AM, Jay West wrote: > > Of those bounces, almost 100% of them were due to DMARC/DKIM mechanisms. I > view DMARC/DKIM as less than useless. First, they are far from universally > implemented - so most valid email is not DMARC/DKIM "protecte

RE: Excessive Bounces

2016-07-02 Thread Greg Stark
few these days which make me believe the lists I'm on have changed practices. Certainly yahoo hasn't rolled back their dns records. So unpredictability makes since sense as the bounces you see will be very dependent on the domains *sending* the messages and their dns records. If you hav

Re: Excessive Bounces

2016-07-02 Thread Comcast
I've gotten the same disabled issue on my Comcast email. -Bob > On Jul 2, 2016, at 10:37 AM, Cavebob wrote: > > I have had the excessive bounce problem several times in the past using my > sbcglobal.net account. I switched to my own private server and have not had a > problem since. It turns

Re: Excessive Bounces

2016-07-02 Thread Cavebob
I have had the excessive bounce problem several times in the past using my sbcglobal.net account. I switched to my own private server and have not had a problem since. It turns out that ATT's anti-spam initiative can be fickle and at times a bit draconian. Bob

Re: Excessive Bounces

2016-07-02 Thread william degnan
oh, and I switched to gmail a while back while experimenting with my raspberry pi, I am not using my own mail server for this list any more. I do use it for other lists. It's easy to switch around, why not just try a different email address at least for a while?

Re: Excessive Bounces

2016-07-02 Thread william degnan
> > > > I have no competence to judge the merits or otherwise of these mechanisms, > so I won't say anything about it. What I would say though is, if this > affects a fair number of people, could the list server be configured to be > a > bit more tolerant of bounces?

RE: Excessive Bounces

2016-07-02 Thread Rob Jarratt
> -Original Message- > From: cctalk [mailto:cctalk-boun...@classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Jay West > Sent: 02 July 2016 10:37 > To: 'General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts' > > Subject: RE: Excessive Bounces > > I did dig into this for Rob,

RE: Excessive Bounces

2016-07-02 Thread Jay West
ers, often because they are major sources of spam. Of those bounces, almost 100% of them were due to DMARC/DKIM mechanisms. I view DMARC/DKIM as less than useless. First, they are far from universally implemented - so most valid email is not DMARC/DKIM "protected". Second a large percentag

RE: Excessive Bounces

2016-07-01 Thread Jay West
Rob wrote - I keep getting emails from the list server disabling my account for excessive bounces. Is it possible to get a log showing where the problem is coming from so I can complain to my ISP? - Gone are the days when people "just know" about mailman-owner, etc.

RE: Excessive Bounces

2016-07-01 Thread Rob Jarratt
> I have found there are two possible causes for excessive bounce, > > a) Worn out shock absorbers. > > b) Badly adjusted high area female support systems > Very helpful :-) :-)

Re: Excessive Bounces

2016-07-01 Thread Douglas Taylor
On 7/1/2016 5:01 PM, Rod Smallwood wrote: On 01/07/2016 18:10, Rob Jarratt wrote: I keep getting emails from the list server disabling my account for excessive bounces. Is it possible to get a log showing where the problem is coming from so I can complain to my ISP? Thanks Rob I

Re: Excessive Bounces

2016-07-01 Thread Rod Smallwood
On 01/07/2016 18:10, Rob Jarratt wrote: I keep getting emails from the list server disabling my account for excessive bounces. Is it possible to get a log showing where the problem is coming from so I can complain to my ISP? Thanks Rob I have found there are two possible causes for

Excessive Bounces

2016-07-01 Thread Rob Jarratt
I keep getting emails from the list server disabling my account for excessive bounces. Is it possible to get a log showing where the problem is coming from so I can complain to my ISP? Thanks Rob