> On Jul 2, 2016, at 2:37 AM, Jay West <jw...@classiccmp.org> wrote: > > Of those bounces, almost 100% of them were due to DMARC/DKIM mechanisms. I > view DMARC/DKIM as less than useless. First, they are far from universally > implemented - so most valid email is not DMARC/DKIM "protected". Second a > large percentage of the spam in the world *IS* DMARC/DKIM "protected".
Amen. DMARC is an abomination that must be made to die. DKIM is useful, in an advisory sense. DMARC just outright breaks decades of standardized email protocol behaviour.
