Thanks everyone who responded. I believe I have all of these in the
library at Kennet Classic, donated by the Wilmington public library. We
rescued them from the trash heap.
Bill
On Tue, Dec 27, 2022 at 11:29 PM Chris via cctalk
wrote:
> "While not necessarily the basis fir the pt68k, there w
"While not necessarily the basis fir the pt68k, there was a similar European
project computer that was touched on a month or 2 earlier. I have not seen or
heard any other mention anywhere else though. The box they had it in had an
exceptionally sexy bezel."
March and May 1987. It was nothing m
> On 12/27/2022 9:57 PM CST Will Cooke via cctalk wrote:
>
>
> > On 12/27/2022 9:52 PM CST Bill Degnan via cctalk
> > wrote:
> >
> >
> > Which issue of Radio Electronics?
> > Bill
> >
> I don't know which issues it's in, but they are all here:
> https://worldradiohistory.com/Radio_Electr
While not necessarily the basis fir the pt68k, there was a similar European
project computer that was touched on a month or 2 earlier. I have not seen or
heard any other mention anywhere else though. The box they had it in had an
exceptionally sexy bezel.
There was also Fidel Castros Cuban com
> On 12/27/2022 9:52 PM CST Bill Degnan via cctalk
> wrote:
>
>
> Which issue of Radio Electronics?
> Bill
>
I don't know which issues it's in, but they are all here:
https://worldradiohistory.com/Radio_Electronics%20_Master_Page.htm
On 12/27/2022 9:52 PM, Bill Degnan via cctalk wrote:
Which issue of Radio Electronics?
"Build the PT-68K"
Oct 1987 and Nov 1987 and Dec 1987 and Jan 1988 and Feb 1988 and Apr
1988 and May 1988 and Jun 1988 and Jul 1988 and Aug 1988 and Sept 1988
and Dec 1988 and Jan 1989
Which issue of Radio Electronics?
Bill
On Tue, Dec 27, 2022 at 10:47 PM Will Cooke via cctalk <
cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote:
>
>
> > On 12/27/2022 9:36 PM CST Chris via cctalk
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Those are for a different board. Maybe close enough?
> >
>
> If you read the description it says t
> On 12/27/2022 9:36 PM CST Chris via cctalk wrote:
>
>
> Those are for a different board. Maybe close enough?
>
If you read the description it says the only difference is the clock chip,
which I believe is "fully" compatible.
I don't have the whole range of articles, but often pcb artwork was included
right in the magazine. Better then nuffin.
On Tuesday, December 27, 2022, 10:08:08 PM EST, Tony Jones via cctalk
wrote:
On Tue, Dec 27, 2022 at 7:04 PM Will Cooke via cctalk
wrote:
> http://peripheraltech.com/PT6
Those are for a different board. Maybe close enough?
On Tuesday, December 27, 2022, 10:09:16 PM EST, Will Cooke via cctalk
wrote:
boot eprom download -- scroll down
https://peripheraltech.com/PT68K1A.htm
> On 12/27/2022 9:04 PM CST Chris via cctalk wrote:
>
>
> What will you do
boot eprom download -- scroll down
https://peripheraltech.com/PT68K1A.htm
> On 12/27/2022 9:04 PM CST Chris via cctalk wrote:
>
>
> What will you do for firmware? I do believe the developer was around, maybe
> still is. But wanted an enormous amount of money.
> On Tuesday, December 27, 2022,
On Tue, Dec 27, 2022 at 7:04 PM Will Cooke via cctalk
wrote:
> http://peripheraltech.com/PT68K2
$399-450. Ouch. Too bad there aren't open-source Gerbers as I have most
of the parts for this knocking around.
>
>
>
>
> > On 12/27/2022 8:58 PM CST Jim Brain via cctalk
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 1
What will you do for firmware? I do believe the developer was around, maybe
still is. But wanted an enormous amount of money.
On Tuesday, December 27, 2022, 09:58:51 PM EST, Jim Brain via cctalk
wrote:
On 12/27/2022 8:47 PM, Chris via cctalk wrote:
> It's a IBM PC form factor 68000 ba
http://peripheraltech.com/PT68K2
> On 12/27/2022 8:58 PM CST Jim Brain via cctalk wrote:
>
>
> On 12/27/2022 8:47 PM, Chris via cctalk wrote:
> > It's a IBM PC form factor 68000 based project that was featured in Radio
> > Electronics. Anyone remember it or even know what I'm talking about?
On 12/27/2022 8:47 PM, Chris via cctalk wrote:
It's a IBM PC form factor 68000 based project that was featured in Radio
Electronics. Anyone remember it or even know what I'm talking about? It would
be a fun prokect.
I remember it, and I believe I have all those issues, as a project to
comple
It's a IBM PC form factor 68000 based project that was featured in Radio
Electronics. Anyone remember it or even know what I'm talking about? It would
be a fun prokect.
I'll pull it out and take photos of the mainboard later. Ve shall see. That
scary monster sure didn't look like a pc to me.
On Tuesday, December 27, 2022, 11:15:06 AM EST, geneb via cctalk
wrote:
On Tue, 27 Dec 2022, Chris via cctalk wrote:
> Apparently Northstar's dos is yet anothe
On 12/26/22 23:08, Chuck Guzis via cctalk wrote:
:
"Lattice C was ported to MVS, VMS, Unix, OS/2, Amiga, Atari ST, and
Sinclair."
The TRS-80 You left out the TRS-80...
bill
On 12/27/22 01:02, Steve Lewis via cctalk wrote:
> asically: programming on an actual vintage MS-DOS system is very painful
> these days. For starters, the 8.3 filenames and lack of COPY-PASTE.
> True, there are some vintage editors that will have a form of copy-paste.
> Another issue is some of
On Tue, 27 Dec 2022, Chris via cctalk wrote:
Apparently Northstar's dos is yet another amended version of ms-dos. I
suppose it was supplied for basic tasks, as it couldn't possibly provide
all the features supplied by Netware. So whereas this may not be as
difficult as I thought, there are sti
On Tue, 27 Dec 2022, Chris via cctalk wrote:
Apparently Northstar's dos is yet another amended version of ms-dos. I
suppose it was supplied for basic tasks, as it couldn't possibly provide
all the features supplied by Netware. So whereas this may not be as
difficult as I thought, there are sti
I don't have it handy, but there was a copy run by the Gimpel family near
Philadelphia (don't remember the company name) whose well-respected C
products worked on IBM DOS, OS/2, MAC and Amiga. I have versions for most
if not all. So, I'd say that "general purpose" can yet be broken down by
proces
On Tue, Dec 27, 2022, 7:31 AM Chris via cctalk
wrote:
> Apparently Northstar's dos is yet another amended version of ms-dos. I
> suppose it was supplied for basic tasks, as it couldn't possibly provide
> all the features supplied by Netware. So whereas this may not be as
> difficult as I thought
Apparently Northstar's dos is yet another amended version of ms-dos. I suppose
it was supplied for basic tasks, as it couldn't possibly provide all the
features supplied by Netware. So whereas this may not be as difficult as I
thought, there are still significant hurdles. The floppy drive's tra
I haven't followed the full thread here, but perhaps this might help:
when I ported DestinyHunter (destinyhunter.org) from the 6502-based PET to
the IBM PC, I gathered some notes on that process here
https://destinyhunter.org/ibm-5150-development-notes/
Basically: programming on an actual vintage
25 matches
Mail list logo
