On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 9:31 PM, B M wrote:
> I have 3 stands, but I only need 1 for my VT-50. I am taking offers on the
> other 2 :-)
I would love one, but I am afraid of the shipping costs to Ohio. I've
had small packages shipped from Toronto and it seems to run over
$10/lb.
> I believe thes
I've been trying to find vendors who sell the parts to build stands
like that. Ideally I'd like the column height to be adjustable, but I
obviously can't come up with the right words for a search because I
can't find them even in fixed height.
I'd like to build one specifically for a DEC GT40 term
I have 3 stands, but I only need 1 for my VT-50. I am taking offers on the
other 2 :-)
I believe these stands to be authentic DEC VT5X stands. Is there any way
of telling for sure? There are no markings on the stands.
Here is a picture of the stand:
https://drive.google.com/open?id=0BzqkBl9PET
Sorry. I forgot to mention that I live near Calgary Alberta Canada.
--barrym
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 7:31 PM, B M wrote:
> I have 3 stands, but I only need 1 for my VT-50. I am taking offers on
> the other 2 :-)
>
> I believe these stands to be authentic DEC VT5X stands. Is there any way
> o
Jon said:
> LOTS of model /40s were sold in the US. EVERY one had its
> own set of ALDs, with the serial number of the CPU on them.
> They not only recorded the general info for the model, but
> they had specific changes to reflect the exact configuration
> of THAT machine.
I didn't know that eve
On 07/11/2016 07:35 PM, Curious Marc wrote:
Thanks for the detailed answer. I see the front panels look remarkably similar
though. Short of redoing a 360/50 on an FPGA (I'd need to retire to have enough
time for this one!), could I use the /50 panel with the /65 emulator?
Not really! The 360/
On 07/11/2016 05:36 PM, ste...@malikoff.com wrote:
Indeed they must be. I've been looking for /40 ALDs for some time but haven't
struck any. I wonder if they're
scarce becase the 40 was a AFAIK a british-developed 360. My dad was posted to
Hursley to learn the /40 in 64-65.
LOTS of model /40s
Mike said:
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 10:36 AM, wrote:
>> Al said:
>>> On 7/11/16 9:14 AM, Jon Elson wrote:
The microcode was in the ALD drawings, and might even be in bitsavers
archive, if they have the right manual.
>>>
>>> 360 CPU ALDs are extremely difficult to find.
>>> If the 65 s
On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 10:36 AM, wrote:
> Al said:
>> On 7/11/16 9:14 AM, Jon Elson wrote:
>>> The microcode was in the ALD drawings, and might even be in bitsavers
>>> archive, if they have the right manual.
>>
>> 360 CPU ALDs are extremely difficult to find.
>> If the 65 set could be scanned,
Thanks for the detailed answer. I see the front panels look remarkably similar
though. Short of redoing a 360/50 on an FPGA (I'd need to retire to have enough
time for this one!), could I use the /50 panel with the /65 emulator?
Marc
> On Jul 12, 2016, at 1:11 AM, Jon Elson wrote:
>
>> On 07/1
I haven't looked yet, but are the 360/50 ALDs available anywhere?
Marc
> On Jul 12, 2016, at 2:00 AM, Al Kossow wrote:
>
>
>
>> On 7/11/16 9:14 AM, Jon Elson wrote:
>>
>> The microcode was in the ALD drawings, and might even be in bitsavers
>> archive, if they have the right manual.
>
> 36
On 11 July 2016 at 03:41, Fred wrote:
> On Sat, 9 Jul 2016 cctalk-requ...@classiccmp.org wrote:
>
> [talk about word processors, specifically WordPerfect]
>
> I would LOVE to find a (hobbyist) copy of WordPerfect for OpenVMS some
> day. Back in the day I could fly through those key combos on WP 5
Al said:
> On 7/11/16 9:14 AM, Jon Elson wrote:
>> The microcode was in the ALD drawings, and might even be in bitsavers
>> archive, if they have the right manual.
>
> 360 CPU ALDs are extremely difficult to find.
> If the 65 set could be scanned, I'd be happy to upload them to bitsavers.
Indeed
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 1:46 PM, Steven M Jones wrote:
> Just wanted to point out that the PDT will happily run RT-11 v4, and I'm
> not sure what the last version would be. I see a reference to using
> VTCOM with the PDT-11/150 in the RT-11 v5.1 release notes, so...
As long as you have a suitable
On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 5:13 PM, Fred Jan Kraan wrote:
> On 2016-07-10 07:00 PM, cctalk-requ...@classiccmp.org wrote:
>> Greetings
>>
>> I have a restored and (I think) functional PDT-150 with dual 8" floppy
>> drives...
>
> The PDT-150 was also sold with a VT-105 as the MiniMINC and can run some
That should be "very soon", as that was part of the reason for the server
maintenance last week to lay some groundwork. Stay tuned
On 7/11/16 10:46 AM, Camiel Vanderhoeven wrote:
> Hi Al,
>
> I have a 7201-2 set that I scanned. They're ~64 MB TIF files per sheet,
> about ~150GB in total.
I'll have to wait until Jay increases the amount of disk space available to
bitsavers.
On Sat, Jul 9, 2016 at 4:54 PM, Brendan McNeill wrote:
> Greetings
>
> I have a restored and (I think) functional PDT-150 with dual 8” floppy drives
> but no software. I do have some blank 8” diskettes but no real means of
> transferring an operating system or (say) a word processing program on
Hi Al,
I have a 7201-2 set that I scanned. They're ~64 MB TIF files per sheet,
about ~150GB in total. I can upload those where ever you want.
Op 11 jul. 2016 6:58 p.m. schreef "Al Kossow" :
On 7/11/16 9:14 AM, Jon Elson wrote:
> The microcode was in the ALD drawings, and might even be in bitsa
On 07/10/2016 14:13, Fred Jan Kraan wrote:
>
> On 2016-07-10 07:00 PM, cctalk-requ...@classiccmp.org wrote:
>>
>> I have a restored and (I think) functional PDT-150 with dual 8? floppy
>> drives but no software. [...]
>>
>> Any assistance would be appreciated. Happy to pay for OS/Application
>>
On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 9:41 PM, Fred wrote:
> On Sat, 9 Jul 2016 cctalk-requ...@classiccmp.org wrote:
>
> [talk about word processors, specifically WordPerfect]
>
> I would LOVE to find a (hobbyist) copy of WordPerfect for OpenVMS some
> day. Back in the day I could fly through those key combos
On 7/11/16 9:14 AM, Jon Elson wrote:
> The microcode was in the ALD drawings, and might even be in bitsavers
> archive, if they have the right manual.
>
360 CPU ALDs are extremely difficult to find.
If the 65 set could be scanned, I'd be happy to upload them to bitsavers.
> > And I'm very close to having a 360/65 in VHDL.
>
> Was the microcode derived from the engineering drawings?
Yes, from hand-corrected OCR scans.
To be precise, the ALDs and microcode I'm using are not for a plain 2065,
but for a 7201-02, the variant that was used in the 9020 complex. I'm
makin
> And I'm very close to having a 360/65 in VHDL.
> -
>
> Sweet :->. What FPGA platform are you using? Lawrence used a Spartan
3. Don't know how close to "full" he pushed it.
I'm using the XUPV5 PCIE board (Xilinx Virtex-5 XC5VLX110T); currently
about 60% occupied, but the design needs lots
On 07/11/2016 10:44 AM, Al Kossow wrote:
On 7/11/16 1:31 AM, Camiel Vanderhoeven wrote:
And I'm very close to having a 360/65 in VHDL.
Op 11 jul. 2016 2:44 a.m. schreef "Curious Marc" :
Was the microcode derived from the engineering drawings?
The microcode was in the ALD drawings, and might
On 07/11/2016 06:40 AM, Curious Marc wrote:
No kidding! That's a massive effort. How close is that to a 360/50? I have a
front panel that needs a brain, could sure use that!
360/50 is a 32-bit machine, the real thing has a core memory
"local store" and (3, IIRC) built-in channels. it does not
On 7/11/16 1:31 AM, Camiel Vanderhoeven wrote:
> And I'm very close to having a 360/65 in VHDL.
> Op 11 jul. 2016 2:44 a.m. schreef "Curious Marc" :
>
Was the microcode derived from the engineering drawings?
>From memory, the 65 is the bigger brother to the 50 with a wider memory bus.
It was a
Unfinished or never launched follow-ons to classic 1980s home micros...
http://uk.pcmag.com/desktop-reviews/82794/gallery/7-classic-home-pc-follow-ups-that-were-never-released
--
Sent from my phone - please pardon brevity & typos.
No kidding! That's a massive effort. How close is that to a 360/50? I have a
front panel that needs a brain, could sure use that!
Marc
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jul 11, 2016, at 5:31 PM, Camiel Vanderhoeven wrote:
>
> And I'm very close to having a 360/65 in VHDL.
> Op 11 jul. 2016 2:44 a.m. sc
-Original Message-
From: cctalk [mailto:cctalk-boun...@classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Camiel
Vanderhoeven
Sent: Monday, July 11, 2016 4:31 AM
To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
Subject: Re: IBM 360/30 in verilog (was: How do they make Verilog code for
unknown ICs?)
And I'
And I'm very close to having a 360/65 in VHDL.
Op 11 jul. 2016 2:44 a.m. schreef "Curious Marc" :
> And Carl Claunch has an IBM 1130 in VHDL.
> Marc
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> > On Jul 10, 2016, at 10:23 PM, Lawrence Wilkinson
> wrote:
> >
> > That'll be me, I guess, It's in VHDL. URL in sig.
> >
-Original Message-
From: cctalk [mailto:cctalk-boun...@classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Jon Elson
Sent: Sunday, July 10, 2016 9:46 PM
To: gene...@classiccmp.org; discuss...@classiccmp.org:On-Topic and Off-Topic
Posts
Subject: Re: Connectors: Both contact surfaces must also be the same
material?
32 matches
Mail list logo
