On 10/22/2015 10:09 PM, ben wrote:
On 10/22/2015 10:54 PM, Don North wrote:
For PDP2011 direct compatibility then the path of least resistance is
probably
the DE0-NANO with CycloneIV for $79. I have several; nice little boards
for experimentation.
You can get it from Adafruit ($99) or Digikey as
Thanks! I'm just trying to figure out my options. There aren't many teletypes
coming up to begin with, and finding something that I'd really like like an
ASR-33 might not happen any time soon. The model 28 looks like a serious
machine. It feels like something someone would have gotten chea
On 10/22/2015 8:44 PM, Don North wrote:
On 10/22/2015 6:11 PM, jwsmobile wrote:
I'm not sure if the author of this nice bit of work is on here, but
I'm looking at a board for this, the Altera DE-1. Unfortunately there
are a plethora of Altera DE-1 boards and much puzzlement by me as to
whether
On 10/22/2015 10:54 PM, Don North wrote:
On 10/22/2015 9:27 PM, ben wrote:
On 10/22/2015 9:44 PM, Don North wrote:
I have one of the DE1 CycloneII device boards and at this point that
family (CycloneII) is a bit old.
If you can get it really cheap (<<$50) go for it, but the last Altera
toolset
On 10/22/2015 9:06 PM, ben wrote:
On 10/22/2015 8:45 PM, Mark Matlock wrote:
Oscar, I am very excited to hear about your PiDP-11 project. I also
would urge you to go to 1:1 scale for the PDP-11/70 panel and also
utilize the classic Purple and Pink color scheme.
One other comment I would make
Oscar,
I am very excited to hear about your PiDP-11 project. I also would urge you
to go to 1:1 scale for the PDP-11/70 panel and also utilize the classic Purple
and Pink color scheme.
I saw Henk's PDP-11/70 reanimation and dreamed of doing one some day, and
then saw Jorge Hoppe's work
43 years ago around this time the Internet we use to communicate with
was probably made possible because of TCP/IP, or Transmission Control
Protocol/Internet Protocol created at Stanford University. Today 3
billion people are on the net but really made it possible for this
extravagant number was th
On 10/22/2015 8:45 PM, Mark Matlock wrote:
Oscar, I am very excited to hear about your PiDP-11 project. I also
would urge you to go to 1:1 scale for the PDP-11/70 panel and also
utilize the classic Purple and Pink color scheme.
One other comment I would make is that it would be great to modifi
How about making a version for a REAL PDP-11/70 front panel, and one for
a REAL PDP-11/45 front panel, for those of us who have such stashed away
waiting for the right simulator to come along...
On 10/21/15 3:00 PM, Oscar Vermeulen wrote:
Hi,
Oscar is already working on another very promisi
On 10/22/2015 9:27 PM, ben wrote:
On 10/22/2015 9:44 PM, Don North wrote:
I have one of the DE1 CycloneII device boards and at this point that
family (CycloneII) is a bit old.
If you can get it really cheap (<<$50) go for it, but the last Altera
toolset that supports CycloneII is v13.0sp1 (v15.
On 10/22/2015 9:44 PM, Don North wrote:
I have one of the DE1 CycloneII device boards and at this point that
family (CycloneII) is a bit old.
If you can get it really cheap (<<$50) go for it, but the last Altera
toolset that supports CycloneII is v13.0sp1 (v15.0 is current).
I have moved most al
On 10/22/2015 6:11 PM, jwsmobile wrote:
I'm not sure if the author of this nice bit of work is on here, but I'm
looking at a board for this, the Altera DE-1. Unfortunately there are a
plethora of Altera DE-1 boards and much puzzlement by me as to whether this is
the right one. The page with
On 10/22/2015 7:11 PM, jwsmobile wrote:
I'm not sure if the author of this nice bit of work is on here, but I'm
looking at a board for this, the Altera DE-1. Unfortunately there are a
plethora of Altera DE-1 boards and much puzzlement by me as to whether
this is the right one. The page with th
2 units one tape puncher thing the other table top ksr 28 other thing a
Powersupply
Ed Sharpe
In a message dated 10/22/2015 5:57:22 P.M. US Mountain Standard Time,
unclefal...@yahoo.ca writes:
http://www.ebay.com/itm/Teletype-equipment-1-model-28-writer-1-reperforater-
1-50vdc-supply-
I seem to remember that the Tech Processor Technologies 3P+S described how
to get a model 28 running with its IO board. You'd have to check that, but
sure why not? It's just harder to do anything with a machine that's not
really made for systems that generally-speaking look for ascii and 8 bit
ta
I'm not sure if the author of this nice bit of work is on here, but I'm
looking at a board for this, the Altera DE-1. Unfortunately there are a
plethora of Altera DE-1 boards and much puzzlement by me as to whether
this is the right one. The page with the info is deficient in details
to tel
Hey guys,
Further to our conversation - I was looking at this beast:
http://www.ebay.com/itm/Teletype-equipment-1-model-28-writer-1-reperforater-
1-50vdc-supply-etc-/121791042544?hash=item1c5b4fd3f0:g:UR8AAOSwnDZUJHWs
Wasn't sure if it was two units? The first couple of pics look diffe
Am 15.10.15 um 00:58 schrieb Ian Finder:
> In fact I may need one for my HP 715.
There are two variants of HP9000/715: The older versions like the 715/33
have HIL only. The newer like the 714/64 have HIL and PS/2. You _need_
that breakout box for the later to connect any keyboard or mouse. It is
ju
Hi All,
I was contacted via the greenkeys list for my spare parts of the two
T100 telexes, but I think it should be possible to obtain them in the
states. Is there someone willing to part of their broken or otherwise
non/half functional T100 in the usa.
they need the parts for a movie.
--
Me
You can turn a 101 into a 102 by simply replacing the logic board. The
101, 102, 131, and 132 are all interchangeable. The only option they will
support is the 20 ma option.
The basic keyboards are basically the same, but the caps and functions may
vary with unit and software.
On Thu, Oct 22, 20
Holm Tiffe wrote:
> Johnny Billquist wrote:
>
> > On 2015-10-19 23:11, jwsmobile wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >On 10/19/2015 12:39 PM, Johnny Billquist wrote:
> > >>Well, you did ask for "thoughts in the conversion", so I gave you
> > >>mine. Sorry if you felt they were unhelpful. I just thought the
>
On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 8:13 AM, wrote:
> I've almost finished replicating the iconic Eames PSCC-4...
> ... A real PSCC-4 is > $700 USD on eBay
Earlier this year, a local small village upgraded their town hall
auditorium seating and recouped thousands of dollars selling the chair
shells on eBay.
On 10/22/2015 07:13 AM, ste...@malikoff.com wrote:
Steve wrote:
(By the way - I'm looking for a red INTERRUPT insert, red STOP insert and
pearl POWER ON insert for my 360/40 console, if anyone can help :)
Is this for a mockup or a real 360/40 console?
Regards,
Peter Coghlan
Oh, it's quite r
>
> Original Message
> Subject: Re: 360 mockups Re: Has anyone hear of the Computer History Archives
> Project?
> From:"Peter Coghlan"
> Date:Thu, October 22, 2015 9:14 pm
> To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Post
I have both of Oscar's awesome kits... the PiDP8 is nice in the small form
factor since it's 'lugabble', but a 1/1 replica sitting in a 19" rack, now that
would be something. I'm pretty sure that the price for producing the kit would
be directly proportional to the scale though. But, as Mike me
On 2015-10-22 17:07, Paul Koning wrote:
On Oct 22, 2015, at 10:36 AM, Johnny Billquist wrote:
On 2015-10-22 16:32, Paul Koning wrote:
On Oct 22, 2015, at 9:15 AM, Johnny Billquist wrote:
...
The VT100 is field upgradeable to a VT101 (I think) or a VT102 (I know).
However, the VT102 is n
> On Oct 22, 2015, at 10:36 AM, Johnny Billquist wrote:
>
> On 2015-10-22 16:32, Paul Koning wrote:
>>
>>> On Oct 22, 2015, at 9:15 AM, Johnny Billquist wrote:
>>>
>>> ...
>>> The VT100 is field upgradeable to a VT101 (I think) or a VT102 (I know).
>>> However, the VT102 is not the same as a
> The way I remember it is that the VT100 comes in several configurations (for
> example AVO or
> not) and you can field modify it from one to another.
>
> On the other hand, the VT101 and VT102 are fixed configs (that is, not
> intended to be field
> upgradable), roughly matching the base and A
On 2015-10-22 16:32, Paul Koning wrote:
On Oct 22, 2015, at 9:15 AM, Johnny Billquist wrote:
...
The VT100 is field upgradeable to a VT101 (I think) or a VT102 (I know).
However, the VT102 is not the same as a VT100 with the added AVO and printer.
Functionally they are the same, but inside
> On Oct 22, 2015, at 9:15 AM, Johnny Billquist wrote:
>
> ...
> The VT100 is field upgradeable to a VT101 (I think) or a VT102 (I know).
> However, the VT102 is not the same as a VT100 with the added AVO and printer.
> Functionally they are the same, but inside they will look different.
That
On 2015-10-22 15:32, william degnan wrote:
Let me clarify... I agree the 100 is a separate machine from the "core
101/102" terminal, even with the same options.
On my vt100 the ROM is different than my vt102, but my 100 has the 132 char
graphics upgrade so it's functionally like the 102 in that
Let me clarify... I agree the 100 is a separate machine from the "core
101/102" terminal, even with the same options.
On my vt100 the ROM is different than my vt102, but my 100 has the 132 char
graphics upgrade so it's functionally like the 102 in that way. Looks
differently inside.
On Thu, Oct
On 2015-10-22 15:05, william degnan wrote:
Note that while in theory the AVO was an added option, the VT102 did not
have it (or the printer port) as separate parts that were added to a basic
VT100. The VT102 had a different board with all those options already on
the motherboard, and no addit
>
>
>> Note that while in theory the AVO was an added option, the VT102 did not
> have it (or the printer port) as separate parts that were added to a basic
> VT100. The VT102 had a different board with all those options already on
> the motherboard, and no additional options could be installed.
>
On 2015-10-22 13:03, william degnan wrote:
On Oct 22, 2015 4:51 AM, "Christian Corti"
wrote:
On Wed, 21 Oct 2015, Paul Anderson wrote:
The VT101,02,31, and 32 are the same, as are the VT100, 105, and 125.
If you say they are the same, can you turn a VT101 into a VT102?
Christian
Yes.
Original Message
Subject: Re: 360 mockups Re: Has anyone hear of the Computer History Archives
Project?
From:"Peter Coghlan"
Date:Thu, October 22, 2015 9:14 pm
To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 7:35 AM, tony duell wrote:
> >
> > > The VT101,02,31, and 32 are the same, as are the VT100, 105, and 125.
> >
> > If you say they are the same, can you turn a VT101 into a VT102?
>
> I don't think there was an official way to do it (from what I remember the
> VT101 was
>
>
> > The VT101,02,31, and 32 are the same, as are the VT100, 105, and 125.
>
> If you say they are the same, can you turn a VT101 into a VT102?
I don't think there was an official way to do it (from what I remember the
VT101 was
sold as a 'closed' terminal (maybe replace the logic board), but
Steve wrote:
>
> (By the way - I'm looking for a red INTERRUPT insert, red STOP insert and
> pearl POWER ON insert for my 360/40 console, if anyone can help :)
>
Is this for a mockup or a real 360/40 console?
Regards,
Peter Coghlan
On Oct 22, 2015 4:51 AM, "Christian Corti"
wrote:
>
> On Wed, 21 Oct 2015, Paul Anderson wrote:
>>
>> The VT101,02,31, and 32 are the same, as are the VT100, 105, and 125.
>
>
> If you say they are the same, can you turn a VT101 into a VT102?
>
> Christian
Yes. For example 80/132 column is an op
On Wed, 21 Oct 2015, Paul Anderson wrote:
The VT101,02,31, and 32 are the same, as are the VT100, 105, and 125.
If you say they are the same, can you turn a VT101 into a VT102?
Christian
41 matches
Mail list logo
