Dear all,
I'd agree with Frank's sentiment. There is a strong risk that it would put
reviewers in a conflicted position. You only have to look at say the world of
literature to see that authors very rarely say anything that isn't positive
about another author's work publicly. As a grant panelli
Sorted - confusion in the conversion to orthogonal format..
Eleanor
>
To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1
This message was issued
Hi Roxanne,
Sorry, I should have replied yesterday. CCT389545 is one example of S710. I
was just looking at these series structures and decided to ask you if you had
something for DHX15.
Best regards
Catarina
Dr Catarina Rodrigues | Senior Scientific Officer
Hit Discovery and Structural Desig
Dear James,
This is an interesting question you have posed.
The trend to open peer review reports in articles that we see more often today
got a major kick off by the ASAPBio Workshop some years back
https://asapbio.org/peer-review . The workshop questions to participants
included “would you s
Job Summary
ModeX Therapeutics is seeking a highlytalented and motivated research scientist
with expertise in the field ofantibody engineering to join our team. The
candidate will be part of an established multidisciplinary teamadvancing
discovery efforts on our earlier-stage programs as well
Thanks everyone for their wonderful suggestions.
Best
F
On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 11:42 AM Patrick Loll wrote:
> Kevin and Guillaume said it all quite well. I just want to stress one
> thing, namely that these solutions are metastable, and will eventually
> precipitate (hours to days).
>
> In th
Hello!
To those who have experience with the production of human proteins with
intrinsically disordered region (IDRs), which expression system do you
recommend? When bacteria doesn´t work...
Mammalian cells, cell-free protein synthesis (CFPS) or any other system?
Thank you!
Best regards,
Jul
Dear James,
Indeed, others are thinking about openness in review of academic documents. In
particular I know of a group who address particularly the idea that reviews,
in this case of scientific manuscripts, might be signed by the reviewer. The
group Biophysics Colab (https://sciety.org/groups
