Dear Xue yuan
What file are you trying to install into CCP4i? The CCP4i interface for
the SHELX programs is already included in CCP4 6.0.2 and so you should
not have to install it yourself.
However, in order for it to work you need the SHELX programs themselves
to accessible on your system - this
Any old references for "universal buffers"...
Johnson, and Lindsey, Analyst, 64 (1939).
Ellis, D. A., Nature, 191 (1961).
Prideaux, E. B. R. , and Ward, A. T. , J. Chem. Soc., 125, 426 (1924).
Britton, H. T. S. , and Robinson, R. A. , J. Chem. Soc., 1457 (1931).
But I never use these buffers my
You might look at this paper: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/
entrez?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=12433100
They used DEAE and have given (in the supporting materials) a ton of
useful information.
Cynthia
On Sep 3, 2007, at 4:27 PM, James Fraser wrote:
I'm forwarding t
Dear developers,
using the FALLOFF option in TRUNCATE to analyse the anisotropy
of a high resolution data set (1.2 Ang.) it is impossible to enhance the
number of bins
to values higher than the default number of 60 (lower number is possible).
How can I overcom this limit?
To determine the posit
Hi Raya,
My reply comes late but maybe it is still relevant to you. I have a few
suggestions for molecular replacement in phaser:
* Input both protein models in your search (define both known structures
as ensembles and search for both)
* Give higher values (let's say 1.0, 1.2, 1.4) for the "rms
Hi
I am trying fit a ligand (organo phosphate) covalently bonded to residue Serine
250 in my structure.
How can I connect this phosphate to Ser-O and during refinement (refmac and
CNS), how should I mention in the ligand in the input and how should I number
it? I use COOT as graphics.
Thanks f
If you are dealing with phosphoserine then there is a monomer called
SEP that is phosphorilated serine. pdb coordinates are attached:
regards
Garib
libcheck_SEP.pdb
Description: Binary data
On 4 Sep 2007, at 23:41, U Sam wrote:
Hi
I am trying fit a ligand (organo phosphate) covalently bon
Dear All,
We have a structure under refinement with a putative Li bound to a potentially
important
allosteric site. I'd assumed that Li+ would lose an electron and have weaker
scattering
than Li Metal, but the entry for atomsf.lib has the same # of electrons for
both entries
while the entries
Number of electrons are rarely (if ever) used. In principle sum of
the coefficients of gaussians should be equal to the number of
electrons.
Ions from nonions are distinguished by just addition charge on the
element column. Example:
ATOM 4175 CLCL I 1 5.299 23.521 60.812
