Thank you very much for the help from all of you.
I used "no prior phase information", and got R/Rfree = 0.2202/0.2544.
I used "SAD data directly" and got R/Rfree = 0.2066/0.2302.
I used "Hendrickson-Lattman coefficients" and got R/Rfree = 0.2255/0.2539.
It seems that the "SAD data directly" gets
>
> I am not sure how you would fare with SAD data directly..
>
>
If you would like a comparison, check out the refmac paper.
http://journals.iucr.org/d/issues/2011/04/00/ba5152/index.html
See Figure 1 - this shows model building with ARP/wARP on over 100 data
sets using
the different Refmac func
I don't know what exactly the phenix.autosol output is.
If you are satisfied with the solution and have a mtz file containing F sigF
HLA etc, then use Hendrickson Lattmann coefficients.
If there is only Phase/Fom then use that.
I am not sure how you would fare with SAD data directly..
But bewa
Dear Cai
On 5 Nov 2012, at 09:46, Qixu Cai wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> What's the difference between "no prior phase information", "phase and FOM",
> Hendrickson-Lattman coefficients", and "SAD data directly" in the refmac5 GUI
> of CCP4i?
I would use SAD data directly if you have SAD data set. I
Dear all,
What's the difference between "no prior phase information", "phase and
FOM", Hendrickson-Lattman coefficients", and "SAD data directly" in the
refmac5 GUI of CCP4i?
I have a SAD dataset and solve the phase by phenix.autosol. Now I want to
refine the structure by refmac5, which kind of i
