Re: [ccp4bb] Resuspension of bacterial cell pellets

2012-10-26 Thread Roessler, Christian
u] Sent: Friday, October 26, 2012 1:35 AM To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Resuspension of bacterial cell pellets Biospec. The chamber caps are dimpled, so when they are tightened, they displace air and a bit of liquid out the top of the chamber. The amount of remaining air is very ver

Re: [ccp4bb] Resuspension of bacterial cell pellets

2012-10-25 Thread Roger Rowlett
Biospec. The chamber caps are dimpled, so when they are tightened, they displace air and a bit of liquid out the top of the chamber. The amount of remaining air is very very small if done properly. The chamber should be completely full of liquid to work as intended. Roger Rowlett On Oct 26, 2012 1

Re: [ccp4bb] Resuspension of bacterial cell pellets

2012-10-25 Thread Dima Klenchin
Roger Rowlett wrote: No air in the vessel, no foam. What manufacturer/model do you use? I can't quite imagine a beater that would have no air in the chamber but maybe there is something new under the sun. Yield of soluble, active protein from broken cells is quite comparable or better th

Re: [ccp4bb] Resuspension of bacterial cell pellets

2012-10-25 Thread Roger Rowlett
No air in the vessel, no foam. Yield of soluble, active protein from broken cells is quite comparable or better than French press or sonication, but with no aerosols. The bead-beating unit is encased in ice water, and is used 15 s on and 45 sec off to minimize heat buildup. The solution still feel

Re: [ccp4bb] Resuspension of bacterial cell pellets

2012-10-25 Thread Dima Klenchin
Roger Rowlett wrote: This goes straight into a bead beater for complete, gentle homogenization in 8 min. Didn't you mean "complete, foam-producing, surface denaturation-inducing" homogenization? I am not saying that bead beater is worse than the "locally near boiling temperatures-producing"

Re: [ccp4bb] Resuspension of bacterial cell pellets

2012-10-25 Thread Roger Rowlett
We resuspend in a low ionic strength buffer in a 2-3:1 ratio (mL/g). We typically get 15-25 g of wet packed cells per liter of TB medium, and resuspend in 40 mL of buffer. This goes straight into a bead beater for complete, gentle homogenization in 8 min. Protease inhibitors are optional. We purify

Re: [ccp4bb] Resuspension of bacterial cell pellets

2012-10-25 Thread John Newitt
I typically use a 10:1 ratio of lysis buffer to paste (e.g. 100 ml for 10 g) for E. coli expression and lyse by high pressure homogenization (e.g. APV at 700-800 bar). I often add Benzonase to the lysate prior to clarification by sedimentation. This works great for highly expressed proteins with

Re: [ccp4bb] Resuspension of bacterial cell pellets

2012-10-25 Thread Chun Luo
: Thursday, October 25, 2012 5:55 AM To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Resuspension of bacterial cell pellets Hi Folks, Thanks for your responses. To clarify, I have looked into any fluctuations in cell pellet volumes (autoinduction, cell lysis, toxicity) and this isn't such a cas

Re: [ccp4bb] Resuspension of bacterial cell pellets

2012-10-25 Thread Bosch, Juergen
We do it differently :-) 1 g cell in 2ml of buffer Typically we get anywhere between 10-20 g per liter of TB medium. Since we pass our cells through a cell disruptor and wash afterwards with buffer to maximize our recovery we end up after cell lysis with about 1g in 3-4 ml buffer roughly due to

Re: [ccp4bb] Resuspension of bacterial cell pellets

2012-10-25 Thread Raji Edayathumangalam
Thanks for the confirmation. Raji On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 10:44 AM, Rob Gillespie wrote: > Put me down at another person who re-suspends bacterial cell pellets in > 4-5 volumes of buffer. > > > > > On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 9:15 AM, Opher Gileadi > wrote: > >> It makes sense to use a fixed ratio

Re: [ccp4bb] Resuspension of bacterial cell pellets

2012-10-25 Thread Rob Gillespie
Put me down at another person who re-suspends bacterial cell pellets in 4-5 volumes of buffer. On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 9:15 AM, Opher Gileadi wrote: > It makes sense to use a fixed ratio of resuspension buffer to cell weight; > we weigh the pellets after centrifugation, then suspend in at least

Re: [ccp4bb] Resuspension of bacterial cell pellets

2012-10-25 Thread Opher Gileadi
It makes sense to use a fixed ratio of resuspension buffer to cell weight; we weigh the pellets after centrifugation, then suspend in at least 4-5 volumes (ml/gr) of buffer.

Re: [ccp4bb] Resuspension of bacterial cell pellets

2012-10-25 Thread Raji Edayathumangalam
Hi Folks, Thanks for your responses. To clarify, I have looked into any fluctuations in cell pellet volumes (autoinduction, cell lysis, toxicity) and this isn't such a case. My colleague's cell pellet weights are the standard 3g or so/L and that's why I strongly suspect the resuspension volumes to

Re: [ccp4bb] Resuspension of bacterial cell pellets

2012-10-25 Thread Kelly Daughtry
In general, I use about 5 mL buffer per gram of pellet, which seems in line with your usual standards. I would suspect that is a starting point of your colleagues problems. In practice, I weigh my bacterial pellet after centrifugation to ensure an accurate measurement. Bacterial pellet volume can v

[ccp4bb] Resuspension of bacterial cell pellets

2012-10-25 Thread Raji Edayathumangalam
Hello Everyone, Sorry for this rather naive and non-CCP4 question but I am very curious. My rule of thumb is to resuspend bacterial cell pellets in about 1-2% of the original culture volume for a wet weight of about 3g of bacterial pellet per L of culture volume. For example, Typically, the tota