This is the heating information found on BioSpec's website:

Like many mechanical cell disruption techniques, the Beadbeating process 
generates heat. In general for every minute of beadbeating there is a 10 deg 
rise in sample temperature. Should that be a problem, the ice-water jacket 
included with the BeadBeater helps keep this temperature increase under 
control. The best control is achieved using a stainless steel or aluminum 
sample chamber. See accessories below. *Rick Hansen at Solid Tech Animal Health 
recently suggested another way to keep the sample chamber cold:  'We affix 
small freezer pack gels with a rubber band around the s. s. chamber just before 
firing up the Beadbeater.  Seems to work well.'


Christian Roessler


________________________________
From: CCP4 bulletin board [CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] on behalf of Roger Rowlett 
[rrowl...@colgate.edu]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2012 1:35 AM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Resuspension of bacterial cell pellets


Biospec. The chamber caps are dimpled, so when they are tightened, they 
displace air and a bit of liquid out the top of the chamber. The amount of 
remaining air is very very small if done properly. The chamber should be 
completely full of liquid to work as intended.

Roger Rowlett

On Oct 26, 2012 1:30 AM, "Dima Klenchin" 
<klenc...@facstaff.wisc.edu<mailto:klenc...@facstaff.wisc.edu>> wrote:
Roger Rowlett wrote:

No air in the vessel,  no foam.

What manufacturer/model do you use? I can't quite imagine a beater that would 
have no air in the chamber but maybe there is something new under the sun.

Yield of soluble, active protein from broken cells is quite comparable or 
better than French press or sonication, but with no aerosols. The bead-beating 
unit is encased in ice water, and is used 15 s on and 45 sec off to minimize 
heat buildup. The solution still feels cold when transferred to centrifuge 
tubes for clarification. I suppose I could measure it next time to see how much 
it actually warms up during beating.

Based on these observations, I conclude that the cell lysis by bead-beating is 
no more disruptive to proteins than a French press, but much, much faster. As a 
bonus, genomic DNA is sheared, so no more slimy lysates. We have used bead 
beaters exclusively since 1997 or so when I learned about them from a Swedish 
research group I was visiting. They are handy in both the teaching and research 
lab.

Interesting. I've never used bead beaters for E.coli work and only used it once 
with yeasts. What I saw went well with what I read in the past from others:
http://www.bio.net/bionet/mm/methods/1994-May/014416.html
Quote: "A comparison of sonication and beating showed that beating was much 
harsher FOR OUR HEAT-LABILE ENZYME IN THE PLASTIC CUP than sonication".

Metal chamber is surely going to help but foaming is still a concern in my mind.

- Dima

Reply via email to