Graeme and Bob,
Wow... It's great to learn from actual experiences.
Thanks much for this write up.
If this were stackoverflow, +1.
F
On May 8, 2013, at 12:32 AM, Graeme Winter wrote:
> A couple of extra comments on top of Bob's rather comprehensive
> recommendations, based purely on a
A couple of extra comments on top of Bob's rather comprehensive
recommendations, based purely on actually looking at Pilatus data (I
mean *looking*)
When you are inspecting the images looking at them at 100% size is
important: spots are small relative to pixels and the point spread is
essentially
The seminal paper on actually how to collect data from detectors like this
and others with negligible read-out time is this one, which I strongly
recommend:
Optimal Fine phi-slicing for Single-Photon-Counting Pixel Detectors Marcus
Mueller, Meitian Wang, and Clemens Schulze-Briese, Acta Cryst.
Hi Theresa,
one issue I noticed during -admittedly few- collections on PILATUS detectors,
are low symmetry space groups and perfectly centered detectors. The many seams
of the detector left us with <90% complete triclinic data sets. A slightly
imperfect centering of the detector or collections a
Dear crystallographers
Is there a good source/review/software to obtain tips for good data collection
strategy using PILATUS detectors at synchrotron? Do we need to collect sweeps
of high and low resolution data separately? For anomalous phasing (MAD), does
the order of wavelengths used affect
