Re: [ccp4bb] Help with MR result

2016-10-26 Thread Claudia Millán Nebot
Hi Liuqing, As Eleanor suggested, if your structure is expected to contain alpha helices, you might want to give ARCIMBOLDO_LITE a try, as your resolution is still within the scope of the method. In case you have any suspicion of the fold that might be and it contains beta sheets, you can try ARCI

Re: [ccp4bb] Help with MR result

2016-10-26 Thread Christian Roth
Hi, it seems you haven't found a solution. If there is no model you might want to try experimental phasing. With that resolution and the right sg a S-SAD might be possible. So you might not even need a HA derivative. Cheers Christian Am 26.10.2016 um 14:53 schrieb SUBSCRIBE CCP4BB Liuqing

Re: [ccp4bb] Help with MR result

2016-10-26 Thread Eleanor Dodson
Can you push the resolution higher? Is there any anomalous signal? Maybe you could try Archimoldo to look for helical fragments? BUT these approaches work better the higher the resolution data... Speaking as one who has failed many times with sort of problem! Good luck Eleanor On 26 October 2016

[ccp4bb] Help with MR result

2016-10-26 Thread SUBSCRIBE CCP4BB Liuqing Chen
Hello! I have a crystal diffracted to 2Å, and have no homology structure. As, i can't repeat the crystallization, so i try using Balbe and MorDa program, the MorDa give a partial model with Q socre 0.46, Rwork/Rfree 0.50/0.51. it's hard to rebuilt using coot, and when i use Buccaner or Arp/w