-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear Mark,
I was tought to always check the outcome of automated secondary
structure assignment, because it is defined by hydrogren bondings, not
by what some software thinks. DSSP is certainly very good, but always
worth comparing the boundaries with
Yes indeed and a very powerful tool. I'm just wondering what the difference
between his old Theseus and Theseus 2.0 is. From the abstract it seemed fairly
familiar with what I had been using Theseus 1.6 in conjunction with MUSCLE.
Sometime BRAIN 1.0 works well too.
Jürgen
On Jul 25, 2012, at
Hello,
Quite interesting article:
http://bioinformatics.oxfordjournals.org/content/28/15/1972.abstract
Regards,
F.
OK, but you don't specify that Promotif uses DSSP for that purpose, right?
--
Pr. Nadir T. Mrabet
Structural & Molecular Biochemistry
N-gere - INSERM U-954
Nancy University, School of Medicine
9, Avenue Foret de Haye, BP 184
F-54500 Vandoeuvre-les-Nancy (France)
Tel : +33 (0)3 83 68 32 73
Fax : +
I got the following response from PDB
In PDB, Helix and sheet records are automatically generated by Promotif
software. Authors who wish to provide their own helix and sheet records
may do so; a remark will be added to REMARK 650 and REMARK 700 of the
PDB entry to indicate that the helix and/or
I've recently noticed that the Helix and Sheet records in PDB entries
differ from those generated by DSSP and would like to ask if anyone
can explain how the PDB makes the assignments. Until now I'd always
assumed that the PDB and DSSP records were the same.
As an example I've listed a few lin
I can confirm the problem.
If I take a previous successful refmac refinement, remove the initial N atom
from
the first residue in the input PDB file, and re-run the refinement I get:
Problem with the ADP of the atom N A 33 ADP is non-positive
-94.380859
Problem with the ADP
Postdoctoral Fellow
Macromolecular crystallography, Biophysics and Biochemistry
We are looking for a highly motivated postdoctoral research fellow to
join our laboratory at the Life Sciences Institute, University of
Michigan in Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Synapses mediate comm
Nagoya Symposium: Frontiers in Structural Physiology
Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan
January 22 - 24, 2013
Web site: http://symposium.cespi.nagoya-u.ac.jp/
Poster: http://symposium.cespi.nagoya-u.ac.jp/docs/poster.pdf
Topics:
Membrane Proteins
Macromolecular Complexes
Receptors, Channels and Tra
No answers yet from the COOTbb (yet), so I'm cross posting this to the ccp4bb.
Sorry for the double post.
Hi there,
I'd like to model a thioester bond, starting from protein A with an exposed
Cys, and having juxtaposed the carboxyl group of a C-terminal residue of
protein B.
The way I would
I disagree. If the primary citation is available in the PDB it should be
cited. If we allow reference solely to a database entry, eg. a PDB ID, then
reference to a wikipedia entry becomes a valid reference and I don't think we
should go down that road yet.
I agree with Evette's earlier commen
Dear All
I quick reminder - last chance to sign up for the 3rd MX User Workshop at
Diamond - the workshop is part of the Synchrotron User Meeting, September
5th-6th, 2012. Workshop sessions include presentations from staff and users on
latest developments, in-situ screening, using fast detector
I concur with Mike
- If the paper reproduces at least in part a result already published,
then the precedent(s) should be referenced (even if the experimental approach
is different)
- If the paper discusses a previous experimental result or inference
from the results of anot
Yes, I think this is reasonable.
From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] On Behalf Of R.
M. Garavito
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2012 9:56 AM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Somewhat OT: question of professional courtesy
Evette,
I think the primary issue i
Evette,
I think the primary issue is what kind of analysis was being reported on. That
is what I look for when I review a manuscript. If the authors are doing a
broad structural analysis (homology of TIM barrels, X-ray refinement protocols,
etc.), I wouldn't expect citations beyond stating th
Well, I guess that would be because when my CV and credentials are
reviewed by e.g. study sections of funding agencies, institutional
committees making decisions affecting my promotion and academic
advancement, potential future employers, etc., many will look at metrics
such as h-index and the like
I think that people who do this are not really crystallographers (at
least to me) since they do not give credit to the effort that produces a
structure. That is why that I always insist on proper refereeing when I
review a manuscript. Maybe it is time for this community to ask journals
to put i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear Evette,
the PDB lists the citation when you enter the PDB-ID in the search
mask of any of the web-interfaces, which is much easier for the reader
than typing the information from the list of references, i.e. all
information is in the article by m
In the least case the PDB DOI number should have been cited.
Jürgen
..
Jürgen Bosch
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology
Johns Hopkins Malaria Research Institute
615 North Wolfe Street, W8708
Baltimore, MD 21205
Phone:
Dear bb,
This morning as I scanned an accepted manuscript from a
well-respected-but-not-particularly-glamorous journal that publishes
many macromolecular structures, I came across a brief mention of
homology and rmsd with a published structure listed by PDB accession
number, but no citation of the
XRF or TXRF would be very quick and definitive. With TXRF you could easily
identify and quantify metals present in 1-10 uL of a 10 mg/mL solution.
ICP-OES will also work, but will require about 300 ug or so of protein
(depending on MW). ICP-MS is maybe 10x more sensitive than -OES but is more
comp
Hi Zhao,
I would try a crystal that has not been treated with any dye. Small
molecules, particularly drug like compounds, crystallise out in soaking
experiments and can give diffraction similar to yours. My worry is that
you have non-diffracting protein crystals coated in some small molecule
cry
Niks
Seeding often works very well with needles. But start with seeding in
RANDOM SCREENS, i.e. "rMMS"
References -
Allan D’Arcy, Frederic Villarda, May Marsh. 'An automated microseed
matrix-screening method for protein crystallization'. Acta
Crystallographica section D63 (2007) 550–554. On
Shameless self plug:
http://scripts.iucr.org/cgi-bin/paper?fw5057
That was done with a crappy crystal in a relatively weak beamline. With
a good crystal one can get cleaner data.
Cheers.
Jose.
Jose Antonio Cuesta-Seijo, PhD
Carlsberg Laborat
We use a Pepperl+Fuchs Omnitron handheld cabled reader. Our model is a
cr2010_4 but this is now several years old. It looks similar to the
MH200 model that I found after a quick google.
It is used for every synchrotron trip, and works well.
Johan
On 24 July 2012 15:33, Pietro Roversi wrote:
> D
Dear All,
re identifying metals,
It's possible to calculate crystallographic element-specific anomalous
difference maps if you can collect data on either side of the absorption edge.
I have used this successfully for Sr, Zn and Mn.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15858259
I have a set of
26 matches
Mail list logo