Well, I guess that would be because when my CV and credentials are reviewed by e.g. study sections of funding agencies, institutional committees making decisions affecting my promotion and academic advancement, potential future employers, etc., many will look at metrics such as h-index and the like, based upon citations of publications rather than deposited structures. I am not saying that this is the way it would be in a perfect universe, but this is the way it is.
Evette -----Original Message----- From: Tim Gruene [mailto:t...@shelx.uni-ac.gwdg.de] Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2012 9:15 AM To: Radisky, Evette S., Ph.D. Cc: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Somewhat OT: question of professional courtesy -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Dear Evette, the PDB lists the citation when you enter the PDB-ID in the search mask of any of the web-interfaces, which is much easier for the reader than typing the information from the list of references, i.e. all information is in the article by mentioning the PDB-ID. Why do you consider it a matter of courtesy to re-cite the structural work? Cheers, Tim