Thanks. I will try the comprehensive script. Originally I just wanted to
see what happens if I do NCS averaging only without solvent flattening or
histogram match, to see whether all NCS units are the same. Anyway, it is
always better to use more of them.
Also thanks for pointing out that the REFI
Regarding your script:
change a couple of things:
MODE HIST SOLV MULT AVER
COMBINE PERT
SCHEME RES FROM 3.0 (or from where you have FOM >70%, as your low res phases
will be more reliable)
NCYCLE 50 (since you have 12 molecules you should get a significant benefit
from averaging.
Then the firs
Hi,
I am using the following DM script to perform a NCS averaging. I have a
fundemental question: after NCS averaging, are the density distrubitions
of different NCS unit being averaged supposed to be the same? I found they
are different by checking FCDM/PHICDM, and maybe I am wrong somewhere...
Hi Xiaopeng,
In addition to what has been suggested:
Make sure to understand that your 'inhibitors' are really inhibitors and
not just general destabilizers of proteins. A binding assay like ITC or
Thermofluor like assay is useful to establish that your inhibitors are
actually binding to the prot
Hi David,
The M215W is on stock at
http://www.alternate.de/html/solrSearch/toArticle.html?articleId=151410&query=zalman+3d&referer=topseller&link=solr%2Fsearch%2Fresult.productDetails
That's a German company but I suppose they also deliver overseas.
We've got about 7 of their predecessors in our
Hi all,
I'm sorry, I know this has been extensively discussed, but does anybody
know right now where one can buy a zalman monitor (either the 22" or
24", or whatever sizes they are). I am a crystallographer at an
Undergrad only university, and it appeals to me that passive stereo
devices exist for
As Harry said, imosflm or ipmosflm recognize and load the .img files directly,
but it would be nice to have the setup files automatically generated.
I have Crysalis pro 171.32.5 - will this generate the setup files,
or do I need to upgrade?
Ed
leigh.r...@agilent.com wrote:
Hi Ed,
One of my app
If the solubility is a problem, you can start out with a low concentrated but
soluble solution of your inhibitor in a diluted protein sample. Then
concentrate up your protein to the desired amount in the presence of the
inhibitor, set up trays and be happy. Additionally you could add more inhibi
-
Jürgen Bosch
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology
Johns Hopkins Malaria Research Institute
615 North Wolfe Street, W8708
Baltimore, MD 21205
Phone: +1-410-614-4742
Lab: +1-410-614-4894
Fax: +1-410-955-3655
http://web.mac.com/bos
Some inhibitors have bad solubility but low Ki (less then 1 uM), we keep
inhibitors solid in the soaking drops and don't know the exact concentration.
For inhibitors with good solubility, we keep the ration at 10 or higher,
unfortunately, Ki of these inhibitors are not good, for example, around
1. Does the packing of crystal lattice allow binding of inhibitor?
There are several structures of this enzyme and inhibitors published, our
crystal crystallized in different conditions but the SG are similiar, let's
say, P4(3) or P4(2), P2 or P1.
2. Is the inhibitor sensitive to radiation?
What concentration/ratio of your inhibitor did you use ?
Also check this out: (short soaks, see time course experiment)
Bosch et al. Using fragment cocktail crystallography to assist inhibitor design
of Trypanosoma brucei nucleoside 2-deoxyribosyltransferase. J Med Chem (2006)
vol. 49 (20) pp. 5
Hello,
If the data are being collected at cryogenic temperatures and no inhibitor has
been included in the cryoprotectant, perhaps the inhibitor would diffuse out of
the active site?
Ping
+
T z u - P i n g K o < kotp...@gate.sin
Seema Nath wrote:
my crystals have 0.401 alpha-twinning fraction,which on detwinning reduced to 0.22
& also pseudo-translation ~48.5,the resolution is poor,3.7 angstorm,please
suggest next step after detwinning
thanks in advance ..
Sorry to be flippant, but you would probably be best spendin
my crystals have 0.401 alpha-twinning fraction,which on detwinning reduced to
0.22 & also pseudo-translation ~48.5,the resolution is poor,3.7 angstorm,please
suggest next step after detwinning
thanks in advance ..
15 matches
Mail list logo