One major factor that increases the difficulty of finding a satisfactory
MR solution (assuming a good search model) is the number of molecules
that need to be placed in the ASU. Most programs can typically easily
and quickly find a solution for one molecule per ASU. Placing three
molecules per ASU
Hi All,
I have a question- kinda general though. I've always heard of stories from
people that molecular replacement is often difficult in high symmetry space
groups, like R32, cubic, etc... I'm not quite sure I understand why that is
the case? Is the molecular replacement difficult because in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
You're right, there are two cell path sizes in AKTA systems: 2 mm and 10
mm. I don't know what path had the SMART. You definitely need the second
one if you want to work with low protein concentrations.
Miguel
En/na Juergen Bosch ha escrit:
> H
Hi all,
Isn't the flow cell volume the limiting factor for your detection limit
? I believe for the "old" Aktas (~5-8 years old) there were two cell
sizes a laerger one and a smaller one, and I don't think it is the same
size as in the SMART system. But I might be wrong.
Jürgen
[EMAIL PROTE
Hi Robert,
In my experience, there is no problem running a SMART column on an AKTA
FPLC or Explorer. I have been using the same S75, S200, and Superose6
columns on all three systems depending on which one is available that day.
I typically load 50 ul sample, between 10-0.01 mg/ml. The peak width I
Hi Kolstoe,
Kolstoe S.E. wrote:
Dear ccp4bb,
I am about to start model building a fairly low resolution structure (3A) with
ten identical monomers in the asu, solved using MR. What I am thinking of doing
is to build one monomer using some form of averaged NCS map, replicate and
translate my
Hello,
This tag is very hard to release, as it forms an integral part of the
RNAse A. It maybe released with 2M NaSCN but this often results in
denaturation of the carrier protein. This is why the manufacturer strongly
recommends having cleavage site(s) engineered in between the tag and the
carrie
It greatly depends on the state of your instrument - how well you took
care of the optical elements, etc. It also depends on the initial
concentration of the sample (and therefore the peak volume at detection
time) and on the optical activity of the sample and the buffer. If the
stars align and eve
Hi,
I have a membrane protein with a C-terminal S-tag, and there is no cleavage
site for the S-tag (novagen, e.g, thrombin, EK). I wonder whether I still
can use this for purification without cleavage of the S-tag. Here are my
questions:
1) How to release the protein bound to S-tag resin? I noti
Dear ccp4bb,
I am about to start model building a fairly low resolution structure (3A) with
ten identical monomers in the asu, solved using MR. What I am thinking of doing
is to build one monomer using some form of averaged NCS map, replicate and
translate my one built monomer into the other ni
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Robert,
I have run those PC 2.3/30 with ~10 ug of protein (of course this
depends on the protein) and still get a useful signal at 280 nm. If you
don't have anything interfering at ~215 nm and your HPLC system can read
at that wavelength, you can e
Sorry for perhaps off-topic question but I am writing to ask if anyone has
experience in using Amersham Superdex 200 PC 3.2/30 columns in conjuction with
the Precision Column holder on a standard (not SMART system) AKTA FPLC. At the
moment using a Superdex 200 10/300 column on a standard AKTA I ca
12 matches
Mail list logo