Just curious, what would be the benefit of being hooked up to build.a.o?
Thanks,
-Alex
On 3/7/16, 4:05 PM, "Dmitry Blotsky" wrote:
>Dear Infra folks,
>
>My name is Dmitry Blotsky and I'm one of the committers on the Apache
>Cordova project. I'm writing to please ask whether it's possible for us
From: http://wiki.apache.org/general/Jenkins
Seems like they will need your apache committer id to give you access.
HTH,
-Alex
On 5/20/16, 1:36 AM, "Michael Wu" wrote:
>Paste the ticket link of this requirement for reference:
>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-11738
>
>Details could a
I'm not an expert, but can't you set these properties in your build
configuration?
-Alex
On 6/28/16, 3:40 AM, "Keith W" wrote:
>Hi Builds,
>
>Would anyone be able to take a look at this please?
>
>Kind regards Keith Wall.
>
>On 23 June 2016 at 09:25, Keith W wrote:
>> Hello Builds,
>>
>> Could
Isn't one of the post-build options to publish last successful artifacts?
That's how we things like this.
-Alex
On 8/1/16, 1:20 AM, "Francesco Chicchiriccò" wrote:
>Hi there,
>I have set up a Jenkins job for building Syncope SHAPSHOT docs at
>
>https://builds.apache.org/job/Syncope-master-docs/
FWIW, on Wednesday we received email from Jenkins.
-Alex
On 9/22/17, 2:26 PM, "P. Ottlinger" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>is there a general problem with mails being sent from Jenkins?
>
>Any other projects that have these problems?
>No mails are sent out for our jobs:
>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outl
Hi,
I'm finding that the UI for Jenkins is horribly slow today. I've waited over
30 seconds for screens to appear. And twice now I've tried to use "Build Now"
and the first time I had to click it 4 times (after waiting and refreshing and
checking the main page to see if it started) before it
Jenkins UI feels more reponseive now. Thanks.
-Alex
On 10/20/17, 10:17 AM, "Chris Lambertus" wrote:
>
>> On Oct 20, 2017, at 1:56 AM, Maxim Solodovnik
>>wrote:
>>
>> Additionally it seems all Jenkins nodes are reserved:
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 20,
Hi,
The Royale-compiler build is failing with out-of-disk-space output in the
console. It looks we may have been partly to blame: we didn't have a
"Keep number of build" set to anything, so I've set that, but still we are
getting out-of-disk-space.
Can someone take a look at Windows 2012-2? Fe
Oops sorry, that is the windows-2012-1 slave.
Thanks
-Alex
On 11/7/17, 2:58 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>The Royale-compiler build is failing with out-of-disk-space output in the
>console. It looks we may have been partly to blame: we didn't have a
>
Is Jenkins Windows-2012-1 acting funky?
This build [1] just failed with:
[ERROR] Failed to execute goal
org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-deploy-plugin:2.8.2:deploy (default-deploy)
on project MDLDynamicTableExample: Failed to deploy metadata: Could not
transfer metadata
org.apache.royale.examples:
I'm just learning about Jekyll and GH Pages. We will be using GH Pages
but I don't see a way to have the equivalent of a staging server like we
do in Apache CMS. So I thought about using Jenkins to call Jekyll to
build (but not serve) the site. Then the last successful artifacts would
act as a s
Thanks Chris, Where can I learn more about this?
-Alex
On 1/22/18, 10:06 PM, "Lukasz Lenart" wrote:
>2018-01-23 0:08 GMT+01:00 Chris Lambertus :
>> We just deployed a new feature to gitwcsub that lets us select a
>>specific
>> branch for a given publishing path. We can now create gitwcsub
>>pu
but we’re looking at ways to
see if we can provide a foo.staging.a.o type URL as well.
On Jan 22, 2018, at 11:08 PM, Alex Harui
mailto:aha...@adobe.com.INVALID>> wrote:
Thanks Chris, Where can I learn more about this?
-Alex
On 1/22/18, 10:06 PM, "Lukasz Lenart"
mail
OK. We have a develop branch in the royale-docs. Can you hook that up to
staging please?
Thanks,
-Alex
On 1/23/18, 2:19 PM, "Chris Lambertus" wrote:
>The branch name can be arbitrary, just not asf-site.
>
>
>
>> On Jan 23, 2018, at 2:18 PM, Alex Harui
>>wro
Chris Lambertus" wrote:
>Done.
>
>
>
>> On Jan 23, 2018, at 2:23 PM, Alex Harui
>>wrote:
>>
>> OK. We have a develop branch in the royale-docs. Can you hook that up
>>to
>> staging please?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> -Alex
>>
GCukaFiiYlsigZYRszYbs2%2F0Gu58PMkLY%2FuU%3D&reserved=0
>
>
>
>On Jan 23, 2018, 20:40, at 20:40, Alex Harui
>wrote:
>>Thanks Chris. I think I am missing something. The royale-docs master
>>branch shows up at:
>>
>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outl
https://builds.apache.org/job/Royale-compiler/179/console
The Royale-compiler build has been failing lately. The error is:
[ERROR] Failed to execute goal
org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-deploy-plugin:2.8.2:deploy (default-deploy)
on project royale-compiler-parent: Failed to deploy artifacts: Coul
HI Chris,
Thanks for the list.
I’m going through the Flex-related jobs and have some feedback:
flex-blazeds (maven) We’ve kept this build around even though it hasn’t run in
a while in case we need to do another release of blazeds. I would like to keep
at least one known good build in case w
about deleting build artifacts.
On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 12:40 PM, Alex Harui
wrote:
> HI Chris,
>
> Thanks for the list.
>
> I’m going through the Flex-related jobs and have some feedback:
>
> flex-blazeds (maven) We’ve kept this bui
On 4/26/18, 2:57 PM, "Greg Stein" wrote:
On Thu, Apr 26, 2018, 16:42 Greg Stein wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 26, 2018, 15:06 Alex Harui wrote:
>
>> Perhaps I wasn't clear. I am not concerned about Jenkins projects being
>> removed, just th
Hi Greg,
Thanks for the background. I assume that adding more disk space is
cost-prohibitive?
What would happen if builds.a.o went away and projects had to request and use a
VM with their own Jenkins instance?
IIRC, the issue for my projects might be that VMs are currently only available
as
Hi builds@,
We've been getting this "Unauthorized" error for several builds now:
[ERROR] Failed to execute goal
org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-deploy-plugin:2.8.2:deploy (default-deploy) on
project royale-framework-parent: Failed to deploy artifacts: Could not transfer
artifact
org.apache.roy
ren't any
builds, maybe an hour or so ago. Please kick of another build and we
can troubleshoot from there.
Thanks,
Chris T.
On Mon, 2018-10-01 at 21:23 +, Alex Harui wrote:
> Hi builds@,
>
> We've been getting this "Unauthori
there might be a lingering config here or there. win2016-2 and
win2106-3 were setup using automation and moving forward it would be
under location in Puppet.
-Chris T.
On Tue, 2018-10-02 at 00:21 +, Alex Harui wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
> I started another buil
Hi Builds folks,
Our royale-compiler build is failing with:
[ERROR] Failed to execute goal
org.sonarsource.scanner.maven:sonar-maven-plugin:3.2:sonar (default-cli) on
project royale-compiler-parent: You're not authorized to execute any SonarQube
analysis. Please contact your SonarQube administ
om mobile, sorry for the typos)
On Fri, Nov 9, 2018, 01:04 Alex Harui Hi Builds folks,
>
> Our royale-compiler build is failing with:
>
> [ERROR] Failed to execute goal
> org.sonarsource.scanner.maven:sonar-maven-plugin:3.2:sonar (default-cli)
on
>
Our Release Managers keep having troubles running Maven's release plugin. It
tends to fail for them when downloading dependencies from Maven Central or
uploading artifacts to repository.a.o. It runs just fine for me on the US west
coast. This got me wondering if we could run our release steps
On 12/7/18, 10:49 PM, "Allen Wittenauer"
wrote:
> On Dec 7, 2018, at 10:22 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
> Maven's release plugins commit and push to Git and upload to
repository.a.o. I saw that some folks have a node that can commit to the a.o
18 at 3:49 PM Allen Wittenauer
wrote:
>
>
> > On Dec 7, 2018, at 11:56 PM, Alex Harui
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On 12/7/18, 10:49 PM, "Allen Wittenauer"
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
n the build and push any binary
release," but I'm not going to point fingers.
-Joan
- Original Message -
From: "Alex Harui"
To: builds@apache.org
Sent: Saturday, December 8, 2018 12:43:37 PM
Subject: Re: Can we package release artifacts on bui
IMO, we wouldn't publish releases signed by buildbot without being also signed
by a PMC RM. If there is a way to skip buildbot PGP signing that would be even
better. And we don't have to build from clean if we have a way to verify the
binaries. There are new efforts going on towards creating
y
PMC's who very the build, in a yet to be determined fashion, what's
the real risk here?
I would very much like to have as little friction to releases for
Apache Camel as possible.
zoran
On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 7:58 PM Alex Harui wrote:
>
&g
What other organizations are running a similar patch/pr Jenkins capability and
how do they implement "security" to prevent exploits like bitcoin miners and
other attacks?
IMO, if you give free compute resources, the bad people will eventually figure
out how to use it to their advantage.
-Alex
ns besides release artifacts that are verifiable.
Infra, please list questions and problems.
Thanks,
-Alex
On 1/3/19, 2:19 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
FWIW, I created this JIRA issue to track the decision.
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fissu
On 1/6/19, 6:58 PM, "Roman Shaposhnik" wrote:
On Sun, Jan 6, 2019 at 6:50 PM Alex Harui wrote:
>
> OK, apparently Infra doesn't want to discuss this in a JIRA issue so I
will try to continue it here and bug people with emails if the thread stagnates
On 1/6/19, 7:54 PM, "Roman Shaposhnik" wrote:
On Sun, Jan 6, 2019 at 7:38 PM Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
>
> On 1/6/19, 6:58 PM, "Roman Shaposhnik" wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jan 6, 2019 at 6:50 PM Alex Harui
wrote:
> &
On 1/6/19, 8:30 PM, "Dave Fisher" wrote:
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jan 6, 2019, at 7:53 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Jan 6, 2019 at 7:38 PM Alex Harui
wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
On 1/6/19, 8:28 PM, "Roman Shaposhnik" wrote:
> All commits, even PR's from non-commiters accepted by a committer are
supposed to be reviewed, AIUI. So if the bot makes a commit to the repo, the
PMC is responsible for reviewing it. In Royale's case, the bot should only be
changing pom.
Let me re-summarize, since I think people are not reading the whole thread or
the JIRA issue linked upthread.
I'm only concerned about Royale, which is the project I work on.
On 1/6/19, 11:12 PM, "Hervé BOUTEMY" wrote:
> I don't have a strong opinion on the above, but I'm very concerned
On 1/7/19, 1:20 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
Just adding my thoughts to the problem:
Whenever I did a Maven training in the past, the core mantra I tried my
students to understand was:
"If it's hard to do with Maven, you're probably doing it wrong."
Ok ... if you're worki
del we could be emulating.
- Original Message -----
From: "Alex Harui"
To: builds@apache.org
Sent: Sunday, January 6, 2019 6:53:44 PM
Subject: Re: PRJenkins builds for Projects
What other organizations are running a similar patch/pr Jenkins capability
and
no...@gmail.com <
stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 2019/01/07 14:35:08, Greg Stein wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 6, 2019 at 10:20 PM Alex Harui
> wrote:
> > >...
> >
> > > All commits, even PR's from non-commiter
repos, restrict the bot
via SVN, then sync back from SVN to Git (all from Jenkins)?
Thanks,
-Alex
On 1/7/19, 10:30 AM, "Greg Stein" wrote:
On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 12:23 PM Alex Harui wrote:
>...
> I still don't get why allowing a bot to commit to a Git repo i
be seen as unexpected.
I think there is a way from Git to pull just changes from a person and we could
write tools to check the changes to further lower risk.
Thanks,
-Alex
On 1/7/19, 10:55 AM, "Mike Jumper" wrote:
On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 10:39 AM Alex Harui wrote:
On 1/7/19, 11:05 AM, "Roman Shaposhnik" wrote:
On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 11:00 AM Alex Harui wrote:
>
> Hi Mike,
>
> Thanks for the input. IMO, that exploit would be easily seen. The
release plugin should only be changing one-liners with version num
On 1/7/19, 11:38 AM, "Roman Shaposhnik" wrote:
On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 11:33 AM Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
>
> On 1/7/19, 11:05 AM, "Roman Shaposhnik" wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 11:00 AM Alex Harui
On 1/7/19, 1:21 PM, "Allen Wittenauer"
wrote:
> On Jan 7, 2019, at 11:50 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
> I don't understand. Who am I "making" do what work? And why do at least
3 others want something similar? And what would you
gt; someone with experience.
>
> I already told Carlos how he could deploy to a
>
> > local directory during the release itself and then use another plugin to
> > stage that release independently.
> > If it aborts, you just re-start the deployment
t and crank artifacts from there. Then you
will know there is an ICLA behind each commit, but you may not know which ICLA,
although it might be deduced from who promised to be the RM around that time.
Thanks,
-Alex
On 1/9/19, 2:00 AM, "Greg Stein" wrote:
On Wed, Jan 9, 20
Hi Builds/Infra.
One of our integration tests is failing on builds@. I'm wondering if Firefox
got upgraded on the Windows-2012-1 and we need a newer geckodriver. We are
currently using geckodriver 18.
Firefox is launched from C:\Program Files\Mozilla Firefox\firefox.exe
Are there later geckodr
On 1/9/19, 7:35 PM, "Roman Shaposhnik" wrote:
On Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at 11:38 AM Alex Harui wrote:
>
> Hi Greg,
>
> You may have missed some other infra-technical questions upthread that
might help us fashion a solution. I'll repeat them here:
think there are juicier targets for a rogue ASF member, like
leveraging Jenkins.
My 2 cents,
-Alex
On 1/10/19, 2:11 AM, "stephen.alan.connolly@" wrote:
On 2019/01/10 08:45:19, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
> On 1/9/19, 7:35 PM, "Roman Shaposhnik&
On 1/10/19, 4:41 PM, "Dave Fisher" wrote:
Hi -
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jan 10, 2019, at 4:18 PM, Roman Shaposhnik
wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 12:45 AM Alex Harui
wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
I deleted 3 FlexJS builds that we haven’t used in a year and a half.
On 6/10/19, 2:29 PM, "Chris Lambertus" wrote:
Matteo,
pulsar-website cleaned up nicely. pulsar-master is still problematic -
despite having run a few minutes ago, there are still builds dating back to
2017 in th
AIUI, you can automate everything except the verification and PGP signing. The
building and packaging doesn't have to be done on computers under the RM's
control, but before the RM applies his/her PGP signature, the RM must convince
themselves that the artifacts they are signing are correct and
ot;bo...@apache.org"
Date: Monday, February 3, 2020 at 5:17 PM
To: "bo...@apache.org"
Subject: Re: [CI] What are the troubles projects face with CI and Infra
On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 6:48 PM Alex Harui
mailto:aha...@adobe.com>> wrote:
>...
How does Google or other non-ASF open source p
write access is not an infrastructure
policy, it's a legal affairs requirement - we're merely implementing
it.
--David
On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 3:24 AM Alex Harui wrote:
>
> Moving board@ to BCC. Attempting to move discussion to builds@
>
quot; wrote:
On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 3:56 AM Alex Harui wrote:
>
> Some questions inline. Apologies in advance for not really understanding
this stuff. I'm primarily a client-side developer. My projects do not have
automated PR testing at this point in time. I&#
Royale-compiler is using the "Editable Email Notification" as a "Post Build
Action". We have not customized the email on builds.a.o, but on a non-Apache
Jenkins instance, I've used that to send just about anything I want. I've used
scripts to write to a file and then send the file as the body
Hi Mick,
FWIW, I am not familiar with jelly scripts, but as I posted earlier, I am using
the "Editable Email Notification" option in "Post Build Actions". In one of my
jobs, the body of the email to be sent in the Job Configuration is:
${FILE,path="email.txt"}
That's why I think you can liter
then we have to spend time keeping them running.
Good luck,
-Alex
From: Gabriel Bräscher
Date: Tuesday, April 14, 2020 at 1:44 PM
To: Alex Harui
Cc: "builds@apache.org" , "gabr...@apache.org"
Subject: Re: Jenkins
Hello Alex, hope that you are well.
Thank you very much for
already have a lot of help with current job, however on some cases we
need
to manually test the PR, and having a way of sharing the build on the
development phase would be a big plus.
Best regards,
Gabriel.
Em qui., 12 de dez. de
We just pushed changes to put all the pixel bender stuff in its own
upstream package that won't be built by Jenkins (because it rarely
changes). Theoretically, this eliminates the need for the Flex build to
need a window. We'll see how the next builds come out.
Thank you for trying to fix this.
Erik,
Let's try to continue to be patient. It is a weekend, and there is a
reasonable chance that whatever caused our build to break totally broke
the server on reboot.
-Alex
On 12/13/13 10:48 PM, "Erik de Bruin" wrote:
>Guinness called. It's official, we now have the longest reboot time in
>r
a manual step on a fresh
setup.
Thanks,
-Alex
On 12/14/13 2:05 AM, "Gavin McDonald" wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Erik de Bruin [mailto:e...@ixsoftware.nl]
>> Sent: Saturday, 14 December 2013 6:00 PM
>> To: Alex Harui
>>
On 12/14/13 7:12 AM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
>Hi Gavin,
>
>Looks like build are running. Jenkins says that a flex-sdk build was
>running, compiled cleanly but timed out after an hour while running tests,
>and then the next flex-sdk build failed because it couldn't d
Hi Gavin,
The build script is using a simple Ant Delete task and can't delete jars.
Can you assist in investigating why the delete is failing?
Thanks,
-Alex
On 12/14/13 7:33 AM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
>It occurred to me that the tests are also going to want a window so if
&g
Hi,
Status says that Jenkins is up, but our Jenkins builds say that the
windows slave is still off line. We haven't had a run since the 13th.
Can anyone help?
Thanks,
-Alex
On 2/16/14 10:58 PM, "Erik de Bruin" wrote:
>Gavin (or whomever reads this first and can help...),
>
>Can you please 'bu
Hi,
I was running a build on the Windows 1 slave that launches the Flash
Player to run a test. It looks like the Player launched but never exited.
Subsequent runs indicate that the SWF it was trying to run is still open,
probably by the player. Can someone see if that's true and kill the Flash
I don't know if a restart is required because I got a clean sdk build by
cleaning the sdk's git working copy before starting the jenkins build.
I'm wondering if there is some upgrade to git that is making it sensitive
to the SDK build leaving untracked files.
It would be nice if at least one perso
again this morning.
>
>I dint think it is a problem with Git or our codebase.
>
>Let's see if a restart fixes it. If not we can look at other options
>
>Admins, any ETA on when you can address this issue?
>
>Thanks,
>Om
>On Mar 20, 2014 11:47 AM, "Alex Haru
Player stuck on Windows
Slave?)
Hey Alex
Can you create a ticket for this in the infra jira please
-Jake
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 12:55 PM, Alex Harui
wrote:
Actually, I was about to start a new thread on this.
We definitely need help from Jenkins admins. I thought it was a problem
with us leavi
Thanks,
-Alex
OK, my bad for not asking for the details. What is the path to the
browser(s) so I can them in Ant?
Thanks,
-Alex
On 3/28/14 12:46 AM, "Gavin McDonald" wrote:
>Yes
>
>GavŠ
>
>On 26/03/2014, at 12:15 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>> Thanks,
>> -Alex
>>
>>
>
Thanks for restarting, but the flex sdk builds are still failing. Are there
folks actively trying to solve this or are you overloaded? There is talk on our
dev list about giving up and using committer owned servers.
Sent via the PANTECH Discover, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone.
Jake Farrell wrote:
Maybe I've forgotten my password, but I logged into other Apache services.
Is there an issue with jenkins?
Hi Jake,
Is there some way you could create a "button" that we could hit to restart
the Windows slave so we don't have to keep bothering you? Or does it
require human intervention to get it to come back up?
Maybe some script we can get at from people.a.o, or a custom Jenkins task
that we kick, o
g to continue to think and work on this. Neither of us have admin
>>> privs on the Window's slaves, so we'd want folks that do (and are thus
>>> responsible for maintaining them) to bless this approach.
>>>
>>> --David
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Ap
Hi Gavin,
On another thread you offered the possibility of allowing a few more folks
to have more rights just on the Windows Slaves. I'm pretty sure Om and
Erik are the right folks. Om and Erik, please confirm.
Thanks,
-Alex
Thanks Jake, we appreciate the energy you and others are putting into
builds.
However, looking down the road, the Flex CI needs are only going to grow
in complexity, so we've elected to try running our own CI server. We have
a private external Azure instance up and running already.
I can't remem
Sorry if this derails the thread, but what is the relative workload
tradeoff to infra/builds of maintaining two slaves vs giving windows
projects their own Azure VM so they can install whatever they want?
Thanks,
-Alex
On 5/11/14 11:56 PM, "Martin Veith" wrote:
>Hi Gav,
>
>I just tried to switc
81 matches
Mail list logo
