Restarted hadoop9 slave. Problem seems to be fixed. Let me know.
n.
On May 25, 2011, at 10:11 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
> This is happening each time I trigger a build, any help? thanks.
>
> https://builds.apache.org/view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/PreCommit-ZOOKEEPER-Build/288/console
>
> Patrick
the moment. Is there something else that is used?
>
> -Grant
>
> On Apr 10, 2011, at 11:20 AM, Nigel Daley wrote:
>
>> Hey Grant. Sorry for the late reply.
>>
>> I revamped the precommit testing in the fall so that it doesn't use Jira
>> email
Hey Grant. Sorry for the late reply.
I revamped the precommit testing in the fall so that it doesn't use Jira email
anymore to trigger a build. The process is controlled by
https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-Admin/
which has some documentation up at the top of the job. You can look
>From hudson.apache.org:/home/hudson/tools/tomcat/latest/logs
$ ls -lhS
total 1.3T
-rw-rw-r-- 1 root hudson 657G Feb 26 05:40 catalina.out
-rw-r--r-- 1 hudson hudson 65G Jan 4 23:58 catalina.2011-01-04.log
-rw-r--r-- 1 hudson hudson 46G Feb 1 23:59 catalina.2011-02-01.log
-rw-r--r-- 1 hud
Just a heads up that you'll see many instances of PreCommit-MAPREDUCE-Build in
the Hudson queue. This is expected as I've just turned on precommit testing
for MAPREDUCE. The Hadoop build slaves should work thru most of these in the
next 24 hours. They will only be run on these slaves.
Thx,
N
Having trouble contacting https://hudson.apache.org/hudson
Getting 502: Error reading from remote server
On the machine, the avahi-daemon is 100% cpu. Should this be killed?
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEMTIME+ COMMAND
+1 for Jenkins. +1 for a redirect.
Nige
On Feb 3, 2011, at 7:23 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 2:39 PM, Niklas Gustavsson
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 2:28 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>>> * which code branch do we have to follow ( Jenkins or Oracle : IMHO
>>> the m
Hudson does a terrible job of killing underlying processes when a build is
aborted due to someone killing it from UI or it hitting a timeout. For these
hadoop builds, it usually means that 3 or 4 processes are left lying around
that can and do interfere with subsequent jobs. It's not clear to
Thanks Niklas. Looks like I need admin role in Hudson and login access to
[hudson, minerva, vesta].apache.org. Want me to file a ticket?
Thanks,
Nige
On Dec 21, 2010, at 11:59 PM, Niklas Gustavsson wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 12:44 AM, Nigel Daley wrote:
>> Guys, I've got
Guys, I've got time again to help out. Let me know if you'd like another Hudson
admin.
Looks like some great changes (new host, better auth) since I was here!
Cheers,
Nige
On Jan 11, 2010, at 11:54 AM, Nigel Daley wrote:
> Justin, Tim, Giri, and Jukka (Hudson Admins),
>
Justin, Tim, Giri, and Jukka (Hudson Admins),
I've had some changes in my personal and work life that require me to step back
from some of my extra responsibilities -- unfortunately this is one of them.
After 3 years, I'm stepping down as Hudson Admin for Apache and signing off
these lists. C
makes sense. i'll do this (as a Hadoop PMC memeber).
n.
On Jan 5, 2010, at 6:42 AM, sebb wrote:
There are two Hudson projects for Hadoop: "Hadoop" and "Common". The
latter can easily be confused with Apache Commons (though that does
not yet use Hudson).
Could the "Common" jobs be folded into
please leave slot administration to Hudson admins. we're trying to
remove slots, not add them, on the Master.
nige
On Dec 10, 2009, at 12:48 AM, Aristedes Maniatis wrote:
I hope no one minds too much... I just increased the number of slots
in the Hudson master from 2 to 3. What happened is
+1.
On Dec 4, 2009, at 12:41 AM, Tim Ellison wrote:
Here's a proposal for tweaking the Hudson nodes usage. It's not
much of
a change and hopefully reflects what is happening already, project
specific resources run tied project jobs, and general purpose nodes
are
labeled with OS identifier
No, please don't do this. It's for lucene subprojects. We don't
(yet) have permission from Lucene PMC to run other builds on their zone.
n.
On Dec 2, 2009, at 10:01 AM, Bhuvaneswaran A wrote:
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 1:47 PM, Bhuvaneswaran A
wrote:
Right now, the solaris slave lucene.zone
On Nov 16, 2009, at 3:52 PM, Tim Ellison wrote:
On 16/Nov/2009 09:53, Jukka Zitting wrote:
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 1:12 AM, Justin Mason wrote:
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 00:01, Nigel Daley
wrote:
How do we determine this for the 100+ jobs?
I'm assuming we can ask -- all Hudson user
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 16, 2009, at 1:59 AM, "Tim Ellison"
wrote:
On 14/Nov/2009 04:46, Nigel Daley wrote:
I agree we should encourage folks to tie their linux builds to the
"Ubuntu" label (which already exists), so both minerva and vesta
get
used.
We s
On Nov 5, 2009, at 2:13 PM, Nigel Daley wrote:
On Nov 5, 2009, at 2:10 PM, Tim Ellison wrote:
On 05/Nov/2009 12:48, Niklas Gustavsson wrote:
On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 12:18 AM, Nigel Daley
wrote:
We should also encourage projects (spam-assasin, ftpserver,
struts, vysper,
xwork2) to move
I agree we should encourage folks to tie their linux builds to the
"Ubuntu" label (which already exists), so both minerva and vesta
get used.
We should also encourage projects (spam-assasin, ftpserver, struts,
vysper, xwork2) to move off of the Master hudson.zones.apache.org
Why are minerv
Giri, can you give Tim access to Vesta?
Cheers,
Nige
On Nov 5, 2009, at 2:05 PM, Tim Ellison wrote:
FYI I have updated the installed Java's available for builds on
Minerva
as follows:
harmony-1.5-32 -> Apache Harmony M11 32-bit
harmony-1.5-64 -> Apache Harmony M11 64-bit
ibm-1.4-32 -> IBM
On Nov 5, 2009, at 2:10 PM, Tim Ellison wrote:
On 05/Nov/2009 12:48, Niklas Gustavsson wrote:
On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 12:18 AM, Nigel Daley
wrote:
We should also encourage projects (spam-assasin, ftpserver,
struts, vysper,
xwork2) to move off of the Master hudson.zones.apache.org
As for
Tim, the Hadoop labeled machines were not donated to ASF. Minerva,
Vesta, and a couple others (used now for buildbot) were donated to ASF.
I agree we should encourage folks to tie their linux builds to the
"Ubuntu" label (which already exists), so both minerva and vesta get
used.
We shou
Hudson Admins,
I un-checked all the security checkboxes for each Hudson user except
the "Administer" box. That's all users need. Going forward, just
check the "Administer" box for new users.
Nige
Looks like the Port Allocator Plugin will only help if everyone uses
it (unlikely) or your port conflicts are *within* your same job.
Nige
On Oct 12, 2009, at 2:29 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
Hi,
Sling builds on hudson.zones.apache.org need a free HTTP port, is
our default and recen
If someone wants to supply a Windows Hudson slave and administer it,
I'm fine with hooking it into the Hudson master (other Hudson admins
can voice their opinion). Sounds like this is to be a buildbot slave
-- not sure it's a good idea for a build slave to have 2 masters.
Nige
Hudson Admin
Nigel, are you able to investigate your end as to why Ceres (a Yahoo
machine) is having problems?
Sure, I'll ping Rajiv and follow up on the email you sent him.
Nige
Since I had to restart Hudson, I upgrade Hudson from 1.323 to 1.327.
Change log is here:
https://hudson.dev.java.net/changelog.html
Cheers,
Nige
On Oct 2, 2009, at 1:46 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
This build had been going on for days:
http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/view/CXF/job/CXF-2.1.
I believe it gets so loaded by builds running ON the machine that the
monitoring daemon can't respond. This is why we need to get builds
off of hudson.zones and onto it's slave machines.
Nige
On Sep 23, 2009, at 7:43 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
Hi,
As a recent new Hudson admin (thanks!) I'm
Hudson (http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson) has been upgraded from
1.290 to 1.323.
Change log is here: https://hudson.dev.java.net/changelog.html
I have also installed the Warnings plugin and the Cobertura plugin and
updated a number of installed plugins to their latest versions.
Let us
New yahoo.net Hudson slaves are now hooked up and related Hadoop
builds have been moved to these slaves. This frees up vesta for any
other builds. I'll follow up with another email on moving builds to
vesta and off the master.
Cheers,
Nige
On Jul 17, 2009, at 12:17 PM, Nigel Daley
The slave on minerva was out of sync with the master. It has now been
updated.
Nige
On Aug 31, 2009, at 12:45 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 3:00 AM, Benson Margulies> wrote:
CXF hudson builds chronically report the following. Could this be
just
a result of a old v
On Jul 24, 2009, at 4:44 AM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
Frankly the only thing we should be backing up on the hudson
zone is the hudson-specific stuff, so just correct the
backup script please.
+1.
- Original Message
From: Tony Stevenson
To: Justin Mason
Cc: builds@apache.org
Sent
FWIW, I'm still working on getting the yahoo.net machines properly
imaged. Hoping to have them when I get back from vacation week of
July 27.
Nige
On Jul 17, 2009, at 9:15 AM, Justin Mason wrote:
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 18:36, Nigel Daley wrote:
Folks,
I'd really like to move
On Jul 10, 2009, at 4:37 AM, Justin Mason wrote:
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 14:12, Justin Mason wrote:
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 13:29, Jukka
Zitting wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 2:19 PM, Justin Mason wrote:
FWIW, my experience over the last few days of monitoring has been
that
our build ba
On Jul 8, 2009, at 4:24 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 12:50 PM, Justin Mason wrote:
Should we set policy for the ASF hudson instance regarding the max
runtime of builds, seeing as we only have 4 build executor slots?
That would be good, though we may want to allow long
Many thanks Justin!
I think there's something funky with the Bugzilla Plugin config.
Our Jira issues are being broken into 2 links now. Example,
MAPREDUCE-693 is broken into
1) MAPREDUCE- links to Jira issue
2) 693 links to bugzilla
Nige
On Jul 7, 2009, at 3:43 AM, Justin Mason wrote:
I'
Folks,
I'd really like to move builds off the Hudson master. Here's a
proposal:
1) We move the Hadoop related builds (Common, HDFS, Mapreduce, Pig,
ZooKeeper, Hive, HBase, Chukwa, Avro) off to some other machines (see
4 below)
2) That would free up minerva and vesta as Ubuntu build sla
This move is now complete. Looks like machines are back up.
Cheers,
Nige
On May 18, 2009, at 11:02 PM, Nigel Daley wrote:
Folks,
I'm informed that {minerva,ceres,vesta,isis}.apache.org (which
includes ci.apache.org) will be taken down at 10am PDT on Wednesday,
May 20, for 1 hour to
Folks,
I'm informed that {minerva,ceres,vesta,isis}.apache.org (which
includes ci.apache.org) will be taken down at 10am PDT on Wednesday,
May 20, for 1 hour to move them to a new cabinet. This will affect
Buildbot and Hudson services for that 1 hour.
Speak up asap if there is a pressing
Thanks Jukka!
n.
On May 15, 2009, at 12:23 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
Hi,
One of the two executor threads on hudson.zones.apache.org died
because of:
java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: GC overhead limit exceeded
See [1] and [2] for more details. I'm scheduling Hudson for shutdown
and will rest
important now that you've
created build.html.
Thanks,
Nige
On Apr 23, 2009, at 12:28 AM, Gavin wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Nigel Daley [mailto:nda...@yahoo-inc.com]
Sent: Thursday, 23 April 2009 3:23 PM
To: Gavin
Cc: builds@apache.org; infrastruct...@apache.org
Subject: Re: Welco
1:13 PM, Gavin
wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Nigel Daley [mailto:nda...@yahoo-inc.com]
Also, Gavin can we have ci.apache.org go to a page that
points to
the
3 CI choices that Apache projects have: Buildbot, Continuum, and
Hudson?
Absolutely, ci.apache.org was created a
On Apr 14, 2009, at 4:06 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
Hi,
Currently the user accounts on our Hudson instances are fairly
heavyweight, with separate Unix accounts associated with each Hudson
account. Do we need this?
Probably not.
It would be easier if most users had just accounts for the Hudso
Justin and I (Hudson admins) have been asking build owners to
subscribe to infrastructure@ for this kind of info. I guess that's no
longer the right place? Justin, should we change that and ask folks to
signup here?
Also, Gavin can we have ci.apache.org go to a page that points to the
3
: Nigel Daley [mailto:nda...@yahoo-inc.com]
Sent: Thursday, 9 April 2009 2:13 PM
To: builds@apache.org
Subject: Fwd: buildbot success in ASF Buildbot on hadoop-trunk
Why are we building Hadoop on Buildbot?
I'm testing Buildbot, to do that I need to build something. I picked
Hadoop
as one of
Why are we building Hadoop on Buildbot?
Nige
Begin forwarded message:
From:
Date: April 8, 2009 9:02:16 PM PDT
To:
Subject: buildbot success in ASF Buildbot on hadoop-trunk
Reply-To: core-...@hadoop.apache.org
The Buildbot has finished a build of hadoop-trunk on ASF Buildbot.
Full details a
46 matches
Mail list logo
