On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 13:33, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 11:51 AM, Gav... wrote:
>> I didn't really want to break up Buildbot pages and its well established
>> (2 years+) links to cater for another build system.
>>
>> It is possible to add /jenkins without breaking them
this is great -- looks fantastic. Thanks for taking care of this!
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 21:45, Niklas Gustavsson wrote:
> Hi
>
> The new Hudson master is now up and running. All jobs and all slaves
> have been migrated (including all history). The URL to Hudson is now:
>
> https://hudson.apach
great, thanks Norman!
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 20:19, Norman Maurer wrote:
> Ok this should be fixed now and not happen again in the future. The
> home directory was not located on the zfs fs by mistake. I moved it
> the zfs and now everything should be ok.
>
> Bye,
> Norman
>
>
> 2010/7/21 Norman
ul 21, 2010 at 11:35, Norman Maurer wrote:
> Hmm works for me, I can't see any problem atm.
>
> I will monitor it a bit,
> Norman
>
>
> 2010/7/21 Norman Maurer :
>> let me have a look...
>>
>> Bye,
>> Norman
>>
>>
>> 2010/7/21 Justin
Hi folks -- there seems to be something odd going on with the hudson-solaris
zone, causing builds to fail:
bash-3.00$ uname -a
SunOS hudson-solaris 5.10 Generic_137112-04 i86pc i386 i86pc
bash-3.00$ id
uid=2394(hudson) gid=1(other)
bash-3.00$ pwd
/export/home/hudson/hudson-slave
bash-3.00$ ls -la
hey -- the yahoo.net executors are dedicated to Hadoop-related
projects, so shouldn't affect the "general-purpose" jobs. Agreed
though that 400 minutes seems excessive. Are any Tuscany-related
folks on the list to discuss?
--j.
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 18:48, Jesse Glick wrote:
> Several jobs -
OK, I think it's fixed now. Looks like the hudson-solaris slave was
broken for several days :(
I've also updated the wiki page with info for admins on how to restart a slave.
--j.
On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 05:08, Paul Lindner wrote:
> I forced our shindig build to one of the ubuntu boxes.. It's
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 12:15, Niklas Gustavsson wrote:
> On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 1:13 PM, Justin Mason wrote:
>> On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 12:09, Niklas Gustavsson
>> wrote:
>>> While doing this, could we look into moving to using LDAP?
>>
>> Where do you m
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 12:09, Niklas Gustavsson wrote:
> On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 11:37 AM, Gav... wrote:
>> I would like the Master to just be the master and have no builds (ideally,
>> we can see how it works out),
>
> +1
>
>> Do we have any Hudson Admins (or wannabees) who would like to help
>
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 14:10, Tim Ellison wrote:
> Still here, but not much time to spend on this at the moment. Should be
> able to get back to resolving a few issues once things settle down again.
>
> Thanks to all those that are keeping things running.
what he said. FWIW I was also on vacat
was planning to setup rsync cron jobs at people.apache.org to initiate
> the copy.
> However, I do need to setup the rsync demon at hudson.zones.apache.org
> to "expose" /export/home/hudson/hudson/jobs/tapestry-5.2-docs/site
> , right?
>
> On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 12:0
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 10:54, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 11:37 AM, Gav... wrote:
>> I would like the Master to just be the master and have no builds (ideally,
>> we can see how it works out), and
>> the accounts created on the machine will only be for Hudson Admins who
>> int
You can set up rsync cron jobs as your own uid, on either end.
Note however that user accounts on the Hudson machines should not be
allowed passwordless SSH access to people.a.o, as they need to be
considered untrustworthy due to the large number of user accounts and
wide attack surface for hacker
News to me, at least.
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 16:46, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Until now we've configured minerva with two executors and vesta with
> just one to avoid resource contention on the build servers. However,
> it now seems that both nodes are configured to run four executors. Was
also set a build timeout of 2 hours.
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 16:33, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This build was stuck for over two days.
>
> http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Chukwa-trunk/349/
>
> BR,
>
> Jukka Zitting
>
>
SpamAssassin-trunk will be moving as soon as some pkgadd dependencies
are installed on the hudson-solaris zone.
do we need to do any dependency installation for the java projects?
--j.
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 09:20, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 5:09 AM, Giridharan Kes
try
sudo -u hudson -H bash
--j.
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 10:54, Reto Bachmann-Gmuer
wrote:
> following
> http://wiki.apache.org/general/Hudson#How_do_I_run_commands_as_the_Hudson_user.3FI
> try to try to do a build as hudson user to see what might go wrong
> with
> the clerezza builds. However i
hi Grant --
looking at the Derby configuration pages, they all seem to be
tied to a node or pair of nodes:
http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/view/Derby/job/Derby-branch-10.5/configure
Ubuntu (minerva, vesta)
http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/view/Derby/job/Derby-docs/configure
Ubuntu (mi
and the hadoop slaves 4, 6 and 8, and then nothing for an hour
> before I forcibly restarted the server.
>
> On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 7:04 PM, Justin Mason wrote:
>> I think we could limit it by a certain number of days. However, just
>> taking a look now, and it appears most pro
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 22:08, Niklas Gustavsson wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 10:58 AM, Jukka Zitting
> wrote:
>> Perhaps we should install the audit trail plugin [1] to avoid
>> confusion like this.
>
> There is now also a Job config history plugin
> (http://wiki.hudson-ci.org/display/HUDSO
+1
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 21:08, Niklas Gustavsson wrote:
> Hi
>
> Would it be okay to install the Slave status
> (http://wiki.hudson-ci.org/display/HUDSON/slave-status) in Hudson?
> That way, slaves would be possible to monitor from Nagios. I'm seeing
> some crashes of Hudson on the Windows sl
, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 5:37 PM, Justin Mason wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 14:42, Jukka Zitting wrote:
>>> That's 30mins. Not sure what we can do to speed that up.
>>
>> Perhaps we should consider archiving old builds
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 14:42, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 2:00 PM, Justin Mason wrote:
>> on the master
>
> Yep, I restarted it as mentioned in the thread about the OOMs.
>
>> it was displaying a "starting" notification for
on the master -- it was displaying a "starting" notification for a
very long time.
--
--j.
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 09:58, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 5:14 AM, Giridharan Kesavan
> wrote:
>> This is the second time.
>
> Perhaps we should install the audit trail plugin [1] to avoid
> confusion like this.
>
> [1] http://wiki.hudson-ci.org/display/HUDSON/Audit+T
ok, I've set up the account. details sent out of band...
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 02:10, Philip Zeyliger wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 7:21 AM, Justin Mason wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 23:55, Doug Cutting wrote:
>> > The Hadoop PMC would like P
Jukka Zitting:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 2:24 PM, Jukka Zitting
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 2:21 PM, Justin Mason wrote:
>>>>
>>>> will this break permalinks to existing projects and builds? e.g.
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 13:24, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 2:21 PM, Justin Mason wrote:
>> will this break permalinks to existing projects and builds? e.g. from
>> mails, jira, wikis etc.
>
> Yes. :-(
ugh. that'd be a dealbreaker fo
will this break permalinks to existing projects and builds? e.g. from
mails, jira, wikis etc.
--j.
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 13:13, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We currently have almost 50 project views in Hudson, which makes the
> main page and all those views horribly wide because of the spac
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 23:55, Doug Cutting wrote:
> The Hadoop PMC would like Philip Zeyliger to be given a Hudson account so
> that he may support the Avro sub-project there. Philip is a relatively new
> committer, and is hence not yet on the Hadoop PMC, but he is experienced
> with Hudson.
>
>
hmm, me neither :(
On Sun, Feb 7, 2010 at 11:19, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was about to take care of some of the pending Hudson account
> requests, when I realized that I still don't have a Unix account on
> vesta.apache.org. Can someone please create the account (username
> jukka) and gra
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 09:24, Tim Ellison wrote:
>> What has been talked about in the past, to the Hudson admin team, is
>> restricted
>> access to Hudson Admins ONLY on the main Hudson Master box. This is going to
>> be
>> implemented real soon now and those not in the Hudson Admin Team will h
he most common task) w/o necessarily needing to
> deal w/ the machine level stuff.
>
> -Grant
>
> On Jan 27, 2010, at 11:04 AM, Tim Ellison wrote:
>
>> On 27/Jan/2010 11:26, Justin Mason wrote:
>>> Hi Philip --
>>> it's purely because the user
the changes. We also added
> support for Clover 2.6.x to our Hudson builds.
>
> Uwe
>
> -
> Uwe Schindler
> uschind...@apache.org
> Apache Lucene Java Committer
> Bremen, Germany
> http://lucene.apache.org/java/docs/
>
>> -Original Message-
>&
Hi Philip --
it's purely because the user accounts on the Hudson machines have
quite a lot of privileges.
Personally I'm open to the idea of making an exception if the AVRO PMC
call for it, and assuming none of the other Hudson admins are against
it.
--j.
On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 01:01, Philip Ze
Thanks for all the help Nigel!
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 20:24, Tim Ellison wrote:
> Understood Nige, thanks for the work you put in helping to establish the
> build system. Good luck in your new ventures.
>
> Regards,
> Tim
>
> On 11 Jan 2010 19:55, "Nigel Daley" wrote:
>
> Justin, Tim, Giri, and
It may be worthwhile using the long-running build lock, too.
(see 'Are there recommended or mandatory Hudson settings for ASF
projects?' on the hudson wiki page)
--j.
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 15:06, sebb wrote:
> Another stuck build:
>
> http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/River-trunk/221/
>
I just restarted Hudson as it had stopped dealing with HTTP requests
-- perhaps this killed one of those builds.
--j.
2010/1/5 Andreas Lehmkühler :
> Hi,
>
> the last 2 builds ([1],[2]) of pdfbox crashed and I don't understand why.
> There were some minor changes in the build.xml [4], which work
On Friday, December 4, 2009, Tim Ellison wrote:
> On 04/Dec/2009 08:47, Jukka Zitting wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 9:41 AM, Tim Ellison wrote:
>>> Here's a proposal for tweaking the Hudson nodes usage. It's not much of
>>> a change and hopefully reflects what is happening already,
On Wednesday, November 25, 2009, Tim Ellison wrote:
> On 24/Nov/2009 20:29, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
>> Per https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-2326, is it possible
>> for a PMC to designate committers who are allowed hudson access?
>
> Earlier [1]
> On 24/Nov/2009 1
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 16:46, Tim Ellison wrote:
> Just checking that the Wiki is accurate, and that I should reject this
> request [1] as Uwe is not a PMC member.
>
> Agreed?
>
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-2326
>
> p.s. For extra credit, what is the rationale for requiring
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 00:01, Nigel Daley wrote:
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Nov 16, 2009, at 1:59 AM, "Tim Ellison" wrote:
>
>> On 14/Nov/2009 04:46, Nigel Daley wrote:
>
> I agree we should encourage folks to tie their linux builds to the
> "Ubuntu" label (which already exists),
On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 20:28, Tim Ellison wrote:
> On 14/Nov/2009 04:46, Nigel Daley wrote:
I agree we should encourage folks to tie their linux builds to the
"Ubuntu" label (which already exists), so both minerva and vesta get
used.
We should also encourage projects (spa
On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 04:47, Nigel Daley wrote:
>
> On Nov 5, 2009, at 2:13 PM, Nigel Daley wrote:
>
>>
>> On Nov 5, 2009, at 2:10 PM, Tim Ellison wrote:
>>
>>> On 05/Nov/2009 12:48, Niklas Gustavsson wrote:
On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 12:18 AM, Nigel Daley wrote:
>
> We should als
thanks. fwiw, if you find future ones like this, it's worth looking
at their "Configure" page to see if they have a build timeout set;
often they don't, although they are supposed to. A timeout of 2 hours
should take care of 99% of builds.
--j.
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 09:52, Tim Ellison wrote:
Well, we could move more load from hudson.zones to minerva first:
http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/computer/%28master%29/load-statistics
http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/computer/minerva.apache.org%20%28Ubuntu%29/load-statistics
(wow, those are good graphs!)
We certainly should embark
I'm not entirely sure it's due to builds alone but I'm pretty sure
it's load related.
On Wednesday, September 23, 2009, Nigel Daley wrote:
> I believe it gets so loaded by builds running ON the machine that the
> monitoring daemon can't respond. This is why we need to get builds off of
> hudso
this may be related to the OOM errors we're getting this morning in
other hudson builds. the machine seems to be having problems (again).
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 11:00, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The local Maven repository at hudson.zones.apache.org contains an
> empty repository.xml file that
hmm
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 14:50, Mads Toftum wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 02:04:42PM +0200, Mads Toftum wrote:
>> There is free space. Just to test, I ran mkfile of 1g as the hudson user
>> in that dir. No problem. Plonking in a 25G file in the same zpool worked
>> just as well.
>>
> Closer
hi Infra. as far as I can tell, all builds have been failing on
Hudson for the last couple of days due to this out-of-space condition.
I've removed the backups of the home dirs, but it hasn't resolved it.
As before, "zone-level" df indicates plenty of free space, but I
guess it's the "backing"
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 12:22, Tony Stevenson wrote:
> Until this is done backups will not be taken of the hudson zone.
They won't? none of them?
--j.
Hi folks --
infrastructure have asked me to suggest that if you have large-scale
checkouts from SVN in your home directory on hudson.zones, please
remove them if possible, as they cause trouble for their backups.
cheers,
--
--j.
's been pretty much the normal situation. It needs more
machines.
Paul, are you still -1?
--j.
> Cheers,
> Nige
>
>
> On Jun 30, 2009, at 6:17 AM, Justin Mason wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 13:46, sebb wrote:
>>>
>>> On 30/06/2009, Jukka Zitting
hi Gavin --
yep, I've retired an old buildbot on spamassassin.zones.apache.org.
Been meaning to dig up my credentials to update Nagios, but ran out of
time to do so :( If you could remove any reference to BBMASS on
spamassassin.zones.apache.org, that'd be great...
--j.
On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 1
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 14:12, Justin Mason wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 13:29, Jukka Zitting wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 2:19 PM, Justin Mason wrote:
>>> FWIW, my experience over the last few days of monitoring has been that
>>> our build ba
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 13:29, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 2:19 PM, Justin Mason wrote:
>> FWIW, my experience over the last few days of monitoring has been that
>> our build backlogs on the Hudson machine are due to contention for the
>>
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 07:23, Paul Querna wrote:
> I am mostly curious how adding more build slaves solves these
> reliability problems, since they all seem to stem from builds taking
> excessive amounts of time, freezing, or having whacky OOM issues.
After this mail, I spent a couple of days moni
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 21:43, Nigel Daley wrote:
> On Jul 8, 2009, at 4:24 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote
>> On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 12:50 PM, Justin Mason wrote:
>>>
>>> Should we set policy for the ASF hudson instance regarding the max
>>> runtime of builds, seeing as
Plugin config.
>
> Our Jira issues are being broken into 2 links now. Example, MAPREDUCE-693
> is broken into
> 1) MAPREDUCE- links to Jira issue
> 2) 693 links to bugzilla
>
> Nige
>
> On Jul 7, 2009, at 3:43 AM, Justin Mason wrote:
>
>> I'm installing the
Some advice to anyone who's deploying artifacts from Hudson to a Maven
repository...
--j.
-- Forwarded message --
From: John Casey
Date: Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 04:15
Subject: Re: Hudson - Deploy artifacts to Maven repository
To: Wes Wannemacher
Cc: infrastruct...@apache.org
Wes
> We tried the build timeout before, I think, and it didn't help. But I
> think some of the timeouts we're seeing now are due to broken tests on
> some projects, and we've upgraded Hudson itself since the last try, so
> it's worth a retry in my opinion.
>
> I also checked the recent Hudson changel
currently, Hudson.zones.apache.org has two user auth dbs:
1. a Tomcat tomcat-users.xml file to authenticate Hudson users over HTTP
2. /etc/passwd, to auth users logging in via SSH
Now, #2 should probably not yet be changed to use the ASF's LDAP, as
we restrict Hudson changes to PMC members, rath
I'm installing the following plugins:
- Audit Trail plugin ('Keep a log of who performed particular Hudson
operations, such as configuring jobs', handy in our configuration with
so many users)
- Bugzilla Plugin ('This plugin integrates Bugzilla into Hudson', we use
bugzilla in SpamAssassin
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 07:23, Paul Querna wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 10:36 AM, Nigel Daley wrote:
>> 4) We add a bunch more Ubuntu slaves to hudson.zones out of a pool of
>> publicly IP'd yahoo.net machines my employer has for Hadoop related builds.
>
> I have concerns about intermingled infra
a Solaris
>> build (how many is that I wonder?)
>>
>> 4) We add a bunch more Ubuntu slaves to hudson.zones out of a pool of
>> publicly IP'd yahoo.net machines my employer has for Hadoop related
>> builds.
>>
>> Thoughts?
>
> All sounds good
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 13:46, sebb wrote:
> On 30/06/2009, Jukka Zitting wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Another Tuscany-2x build [1] was stuck with lots of OOM errors and
>> other failures in the console log. I killed the build as it was taking
>> already almost 7 hours, which is much more than the 40 mi
restarting Hudson now.
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 03:00, sebb wrote:
> As the subject says - the two builds have each been going for over two days
> now.
>
>
fwiw, when we used Buildbot in SpamAssassin I had an apache instance
running mod_proxy acting as a reverse proxy, using some mod_rewrite
rules to serve a small set of static files and proxying for the rest:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/spamassassin/trunk/build/automc/etc-apache-local-conf-httpd.co
68 matches
Mail list logo
