fwiw, when we used Buildbot in SpamAssassin I had an apache instance running mod_proxy acting as a reverse proxy, using some mod_rewrite rules to serve a small set of static files and proxying for the rest:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/spamassassin/trunk/build/automc/etc-apache-local-conf-httpd.conf?r1=562468&r2=629767 however there was a problem with that, in that mod_proxy couldn't deal with the streaming results produced by buildbot. may have been fixed since then though. --j. On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 15:02, Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org> wrote: > > Gav, > > Why should that page be generated by buildbot? Couldn't that one index.html > just be a static page checked into SVN someplace and served directly? > > Dan > > > On Thu April 23 2009 9:52:09 am Gavin wrote: >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: Daniel Kulp [mailto:dk...@apache.org] >> > Sent: Thursday, 23 April 2009 11:25 PM >> > To: infrastruct...@apache.org >> > Cc: Nigel Daley; Gavin; builds@apache.org >> > Subject: Re: Welcome to the builds list! >> > >> > >> > Is there any particular reason that the index page at ci.apache.org be >> > updated >> > to add sections for Hudson and Continuum? Would that solve everyones >> > issues? >> >> I reckon I can do that yes. It is generated with twisted and buried in >> buildbot somewhere but I'll look at doing that. >> >> To be clear, I'll move the current index page that shows the default >> 'Welcome to Buildbot' to ci.apache.org/buildbot and replace it with a new >> page that lists the other two CIs. >> >> As much as it seems strange hacking Buildbot code to advertise other CI >> servers on it, it's what people want so hey ho. >> >> Gav... >> >> > Or maybe push buildbot stuff into ci.apache.org/buildbot, have >> > ci.apache.org/hudson and continuum. There "index" at ci.apache.org >> > would still mention and point to buildbot stuff, so existing blogs and >> > stuff would >> > still be "accurate". >> > >> > I'm failing to see what all the hub-bub is about. >> > >> > Dan >> > >> > On Thu April 23 2009 1:22:49 am Nigel Daley wrote: >> > > On Apr 16, 2009, at 2:25 AM, Gavin wrote: >> > > >> -----Original Message----- >> > > >> From: bdelacre...@gmail.com [mailto:bdelacre...@gmail.com] On >> > > >> Behalf Of >> > > >> Bertrand Delacretaz >> > > >> Sent: Wednesday, 15 April 2009 6:28 PM >> > > >> To: builds@apache.org >> > > >> Subject: Re: Welcome to the builds list! >> > > >> >> > > >> On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 1:13 PM, Gavin <ga...@16degrees.com.au> >> > > >> >> > > >> wrote: >> > > >>>> -----Original Message----- >> > > >>>> From: Nigel Daley [mailto:nda...@yahoo-inc.com] >> > > >>>> .... Also, Gavin can we have ci.apache.org go to a page that >> > > >>>> points to >> > > >> >> > > >> the >> > > >> >> > > >>>> 3 CI choices that Apache projects have: Buildbot, Continuum, and >> > > >> >> > > >> Hudson? >> > > >> >> > > >>> Absolutely, ci.apache.org was created a couple of months back >> > > >>> whilst >> > > >> >> > > >> testing >> > > >> >> > > >>> buildbot and before this amalgamation of CIs list was thought >> > > >>> about. It >> > > >>> makes sense so I will do that soon, thanks for the suggestion.... >> > > >> >> > > >> It might be good to mention this list there as well. >> > > >> -Bertrand >> > > > >> > > > Yep good plan. >> > > > >> > > > A slight change to name to use as the main builds area to go to, >> > > > ci.apache.org has been advertised/blogged/tweeted/whatever as >> > > > belonging to >> > > > the buildbot setup. I think it is too late now to move that to >> > > > another domain. Either way, a new name was needed for either buildbot >> > > > usage or the >> > > > main builds area (landing page?). >> > > > >> > > > So, to keep inline with this list name etc, and Wendy proposed on >> > > > IRC that >> > > > builds.apache.org would be a better fit for the new area. >> > > > >> > > > If there are no objections I'd like to ask infra if they could set >> > > > that up >> > > > for us? (cc:d) >> > > > >> > > > Gav... >> > > >> > > Hmm, not crazy about this, but ok. Not sure why you didn't go with >> > > buildbot.apache.org. Taking ci.apache.org seems a little over >> > > reaching. >> > > >> > > Nige >> > >> > -- >> > Daniel Kulp >> > dk...@apache.org >> > http://www.dankulp.com/blog >> > >> > >> > -- >> > No virus found in this incoming message. >> > Checked by AVG. >> > Version: 7.5.557 / Virus Database: 270.12.2/2074 - Release Date: >> > 4/22/2009 8:49 AM > > -- > Daniel Kulp > dk...@apache.org > http://www.dankulp.com/blog > >
