Well, we could move more load from hudson.zones to minerva first: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/computer/%28master%29/load-statistics http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/computer/minerva.apache.org%20%28Ubuntu%29/load-statistics
(wow, those are good graphs!) We certainly should embark on a program of persuading projects to schedule their jobs on both Linux and Solaris, though, to do that.... --j. On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 14:48, Tim Ellison <t.p.elli...@gmail.com> wrote: > Just looking at the Hudson machine utilization at the moment. There are > a number of jobs that are tied to particular machines in the queue, and > a number of (hadoop-labeled) machines that are committed to tied jobs only. > > I realize that the machines are courteously donated etc, but is the > capacity being used effectively [1]? > > In particular, would the Hadoop jobs be impacted if we reclassified an > existing slave as general usage, and more jobs as scheduable anywhere? > > [1] e.g. > http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/computer/hadoop1%20%28Ubuntu%29/load-statistics?type=hour > > Regards, > Tim > > -- --j.
