We are going to try it in Airflow in parallel to our tests for GitLab CI +
Kubernetes Cluster on GKE. For now the only problem is that you cannot have
runners run on your own infrastructure (but we will have to see how it will
work with Actions and whether Airflow's requirements for our test
enviro
This service certainly sounds more useful than Travis at this point. Fairly
useful for basic CI, especially projects that control their builds through
proper tooling (like Maven) and don’t rely on a bunch of Jenkins plugins.
On Sun, Aug 11, 2019 at 18:24, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 11, 2019
On Sun, Aug 11, 2019 at 5:39 PM Francis Chuang
wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> Should we/are we allowed to use Github Actions for ASF projects on
> Github right now? Do we need permission from infra or ASF itself?
>
Try it. We don't know if/what barriers might exist.
Infra's position is that we want to e
Hi Greg,
Should we/are we allowed to use Github Actions for ASF projects on
Github right now? Do we need permission from infra or ASF itself?
Regarding automated website builds: Currently, this is only possible on
the ASF git-websites jenkins node as it holds the correct git
credentials to p
On Sun, Aug 11, 2019 at 5:15 PM Francis Chuang
wrote:
>...
> I think there are quite a few ASF projects using gitbox and Github and
> this would be a very good complement or replacement for Travis, appvoyer
> and other CI/CD platforms currently in use.
>
> Is there any interest from the ASF to en
Github Actions recently added support for CI/CD and has been in public
beta for a while. It's also pretty well documented [1] and supports
running tests in multiple docker containers using docker-compose.
I think there are quite a few ASF projects using gitbox and Github and
this would be a ve
