On Mon, 21 Oct 2024 14:41:48 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
> When GH output is too large, we do not actually truncate it after
> [JDK-8341424](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8341424). The error log
> would be:
>
>
> Run bash ./.github/scripts/gen-test-results.sh "$GITHUB_STEP_SUMMARY"
> .
On Mon, 21 Oct 2024 14:41:48 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
> When GH output is too large, we do not actually truncate it after
> [JDK-8341424](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8341424). The error log
> would be:
>
>
> Run bash ./.github/scripts/gen-test-results.sh "$GITHUB_STEP_SUMMARY"
> .
On Fri, 18 Oct 2024 19:03:30 GMT, Sean Mullan wrote:
>> This is the implementation of JEP 486: Permanently Disable the Security
>> Manager. See [JEP 486](https://openjdk.org/jeps/486) for more details. The
>> [CSR](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8338412) describes in detail the
>> main ch
On Tue, 22 Oct 2024 08:16:38 GMT, Prasanta Sadhukhan
wrote:
>> Sean Mullan has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
>> merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains 97 commits:
>>
>> - Merge remote-tracking branch 'jdk-sandbox/jep486' into JDK-8338411
>> - Change apiNo
On Tue, 22 Oct 2024 09:29:38 GMT, Prasanta Sadhukhan
wrote:
>> Sean Mullan has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
>> merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains 97 commits:
>>
>> - Merge remote-tracking branch 'jdk-sandbox/jep486' into JDK-8338411
>> - Change apiNo
On Tue, 22 Oct 2024 16:19:24 GMT, Roman Kennke wrote:
>> This is the main body of the JEP 450: Compact Object Headers (Experimental).
>>
>> It is also a follow-up to #20640, which now also includes (and supersedes)
>> #20603 and #20605, plus the Tiny Class-Pointers parts that have been
>> prev
The target mac-jdk-bundle can fail randomly. MacBundles.gmk defines a large
number of individual copy rules, which can execute in any order. The
"install-file" (our copy) macro on macos includes a check for weird attributes
using `xattr` so that we can remove them. We use the switch `-s` to make
On Fri, 18 Oct 2024 19:03:30 GMT, Sean Mullan wrote:
>> This is the implementation of JEP 486: Permanently Disable the Security
>> Manager. See [JEP 486](https://openjdk.org/jeps/486) for more details. The
>> [CSR](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8338412) describes in detail the
>> main ch
On Tue, 22 Oct 2024 08:09:01 GMT, Prasanta Sadhukhan
wrote:
>> Sean Mullan has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
>> merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains 97 commits:
>>
>> - Merge remote-tracking branch 'jdk-sandbox/jep486' into JDK-8338411
>> - Change apiNo
On Tue, 22 Oct 2024 15:22:08 GMT, Sean Mullan wrote:
>> test/jdk/javax/swing/JComboBox/8080972/TestBasicComboBoxEditor.java line 26:
>>
>>> 24: import javax.swing.SwingUtilities;
>>> 25: import javax.swing.plaf.basic.BasicComboBoxEditor;
>>> 26: /*
>>
>> I think we have finally decided that jtr
On Mon, 21 Oct 2024 14:34:30 GMT, Julian Waters wrote:
> After 8339120, gcc began catching many different instances of unused code in
> the Windows specific codebase. Some of these seem to be bugs. I've taken the
> effort to mark out all the relevant globals and locals that trigger the
> unuse
> This is the main body of the JEP 450: Compact Object Headers (Experimental).
>
> It is also a follow-up to #20640, which now also includes (and supersedes)
> #20603 and #20605, plus the Tiny Class-Pointers parts that have been
> previously missing.
>
> Main changes:
> - Introduction of the (
On Tue, 22 Oct 2024 16:19:24 GMT, Roman Kennke wrote:
>> This is the main body of the JEP 450: Compact Object Headers (Experimental).
>>
>> It is also a follow-up to #20640, which now also includes (and supersedes)
>> #20603 and #20605, plus the Tiny Class-Pointers parts that have been
>> prev
On Tue, 22 Oct 2024 09:40:35 GMT, David Holmes wrote:
> > Aren't the dt_shmem and jdwp changes related to HotSpot?
>
> Nope. That's core-svc - the non-hotspot side of serviceability. :)
Oh, well I guess you learn something new everyday :)
-
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/
> This is the main body of the JEP 450: Compact Object Headers (Experimental).
>
> It is also a follow-up to #20640, which now also includes (and supersedes)
> #20603 and #20605, plus the Tiny Class-Pointers parts that have been
> previously missing.
>
> Main changes:
> - Introduction of the (
On Fri, 18 Oct 2024 19:03:30 GMT, Sean Mullan wrote:
>> This is the implementation of JEP 486: Permanently Disable the Security
>> Manager. See [JEP 486](https://openjdk.org/jeps/486) for more details. The
>> [CSR](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8338412) describes in detail the
>> main ch
> This is the main body of the JEP 450: Compact Object Headers (Experimental).
>
> It is also a follow-up to #20640, which now also includes (and supersedes)
> #20603 and #20605, plus the Tiny Class-Pointers parts that have been
> previously missing.
>
> Main changes:
> - Introduction of the (
On Tue, 22 Oct 2024 01:43:50 GMT, Julian Waters wrote:
> Aren't the dt_shmem and jdwp changes related to HotSpot?
Nope. That's core-svc - the non-hotspot side of serviceability. :)
-
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/21616#issuecomment-2428793636
On Tue, 22 Oct 2024 11:19:19 GMT, Roman Kennke wrote:
>> This is the main body of the JEP 450: Compact Object Headers (Experimental).
>>
>> It is also a follow-up to #20640, which now also includes (and supersedes)
>> #20603 and #20605, plus the Tiny Class-Pointers parts that have been
>> prev
On Fri, 18 Oct 2024 19:03:30 GMT, Sean Mullan wrote:
>> This is the implementation of JEP 486: Permanently Disable the Security
>> Manager. See [JEP 486](https://openjdk.org/jeps/486) for more details. The
>> [CSR](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8338412) describes in detail the
>> main ch
After 8339120, gcc began catching many different instances of unused code in
the Windows specific codebase. Some of these seem to be bugs. I've taken the
effort to mark out all the relevant globals and locals that trigger the unused
warnings and addressed all of them by commenting out the code a
On Wed, 23 Oct 2024 05:07:37 GMT, Julian Waters wrote:
> After 8339120, gcc began catching many different instances of unused code in
> the Windows specific codebase. Some of these seem to be bugs. I've taken the
> effort to mark out all the relevant globals and locals that trigger the
> unuse
On Tue, 22 Oct 2024 18:03:12 GMT, Chris Plummer wrote:
>> After 8339120, gcc began catching many different instances of unused code in
>> the Windows specific codebase. Some of these seem to be bugs. I've taken the
>> effort to mark out all the relevant globals and locals that trigger the
>> u
On Mon, 21 Oct 2024 13:12:55 GMT, SendaoYan wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> In
>> [make/RunTests.gmk](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/master/make/RunTests.gmk#L208),
>> the keyword is 'TEST_THREAD_FACTORY'.
>>
>> So the below test command will print error:
>>
>> make test TEST=test/jdk/java/math/Big
On Sun, 20 Oct 2024 02:11:11 GMT, SendaoYan wrote:
> Hi all,
> In
> [make/RunTests.gmk](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/master/make/RunTests.gmk#L208),
> the keyword is 'TEST_THREAD_FACTORY'.
>
> So the below test command will print error:
>
> make test TEST=test/jdk/java/math/BigInteger/
On Mon, 21 Oct 2024 13:17:27 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
> When trying to sort out the LDFLAGS issues, it turned out that I could not
> run the linux launcher at all, not even when checking out older commits of
> this PR. I am almost at a loss here; I assume that this worked when I created
On Fri, 18 Oct 2024 19:03:30 GMT, Sean Mullan wrote:
>> This is the implementation of JEP 486: Permanently Disable the Security
>> Manager. See [JEP 486](https://openjdk.org/jeps/486) for more details. The
>> [CSR](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8338412) describes in detail the
>> main ch
On Tue, 22 Oct 2024 16:44:59 GMT, Phil Race wrote:
>> This should be addressed in a more general separate task, and not part of
>> this PR since it does not have anything to do with the changes in this JEP.
>
> Agreed. This is not a "clean up / update tests" task.
> If it is a change on some lin
On Tue, 22 Oct 2024 16:46:53 GMT, Phil Race wrote:
>> Not specific to JEP 486, this should be done as part of a different issue.
>
> agreed
there were many tests modified in javax_swing in this PR where the author tag
is removed, only this is missed so I pointed it out...
-
PR Rev
On Fri, 18 Oct 2024 19:03:30 GMT, Sean Mullan wrote:
>> This is the implementation of JEP 486: Permanently Disable the Security
>> Manager. See [JEP 486](https://openjdk.org/jeps/486) for more details. The
>> [CSR](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8338412) describes in detail the
>> main ch
On Fri, 18 Oct 2024 19:03:30 GMT, Sean Mullan wrote:
>> This is the implementation of JEP 486: Permanently Disable the Security
>> Manager. See [JEP 486](https://openjdk.org/jeps/486) for more details. The
>> [CSR](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8338412) describes in detail the
>> main ch
> Hi,
> Can you help to review the patch? Previously it's
> https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/18605.
> This pr is based on https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/20781.
>
> Thanks!
>
> ## Test
> ### tests:
> * test/jdk/jdk/incubator/vector/
> * test/hotspot/jtreg/compiler/vectorapi/
>
> ### opti
On Fri, 18 Oct 2024 19:03:30 GMT, Sean Mullan wrote:
>> This is the implementation of JEP 486: Permanently Disable the Security
>> Manager. See [JEP 486](https://openjdk.org/jeps/486) for more details. The
>> [CSR](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8338412) describes in detail the
>> main ch
On Thu, 19 Sep 2024 13:34:47 GMT, Thomas Stuefe wrote:
>> Do you seen any effects of this in anything other than special-crafted micro
>> benchmarks? I wonder if it would be good enough to hard-code this to be 10
>> for the first integration of Lilliput.
>
> I will do some benchmarks
I did Spe
> Please review this patch which adds a jlink mode to the JDK which doesn't
> need the packaged modules being present. A.k.a run-time image based jlink.
> Fundamentally this patch adds an option to use `jlink` even though your JDK
> install might not come with the packaged modules (directory `jm
On Mon, 5 Aug 2024 12:43:52 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
>> Chen Liang has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Update html
>
> doc/building.md line 28:
>
>> 26: 4. Verify your newly built JDK: \
>> 27: `./build/*/images/j
> Context: https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/build-dev/2024-July/045586.html
>
> People were confused on a few details around fixing windows space names,
> including:
> 1. setshortname can report confusing error message when the directory is in
> use
> 2. Many directories can have names set but
> Context: https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/build-dev/2024-July/045586.html
>
> People were confused on a few details around fixing windows space names,
> including:
> 1. setshortname can report confusing error message when the directory is in
> use
> 2. Many directories can have names set but
On Tue, 22 Oct 2024 14:49:40 GMT, Chen Liang wrote:
>> Context: https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/build-dev/2024-July/045586.html
>>
>> People were confused on a few details around fixing windows space names,
>> including:
>> 1. setshortname can report confusing error message when the director
On Tue, 22 Oct 2024 11:50:13 GMT, Michael McMahon wrote:
>> Sean Mullan has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
>> merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains 97 commits:
>>
>> - Merge remote-tracking branch 'jdk-sandbox/jep486' into JDK-8338411
>> - Change apiNote t
> This is the main body of the JEP 450: Compact Object Headers (Experimental).
>
> It is also a follow-up to #20640, which now also includes (and supersedes)
> #20603 and #20605, plus the Tiny Class-Pointers parts that have been
> previously missing.
>
> Main changes:
> - Introduction of the (
On Fri, 18 Oct 2024 19:03:30 GMT, Sean Mullan wrote:
>> This is the implementation of JEP 486: Permanently Disable the Security
>> Manager. See [JEP 486](https://openjdk.org/jeps/486) for more details. The
>> [CSR](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8338412) describes in detail the
>> main ch
On Mon, 21 Oct 2024 09:53:16 GMT, Fei Gao wrote:
>> Hamlin Li has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> add missing files
>
> src/hotspot/cpu/aarch64/stubGenerator_aarch64.cpp line 8207:
>
>> 8205: for (int op = 0; op < Vect
On Fri, 18 Oct 2024 19:03:30 GMT, Sean Mullan wrote:
>> This is the implementation of JEP 486: Permanently Disable the Security
>> Manager. See [JEP 486](https://openjdk.org/jeps/486) for more details. The
>> [CSR](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8338412) describes in detail the
>> main ch
On Fri, 18 Oct 2024 19:03:30 GMT, Sean Mullan wrote:
>> This is the implementation of JEP 486: Permanently Disable the Security
>> Manager. See [JEP 486](https://openjdk.org/jeps/486) for more details. The
>> [CSR](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8338412) describes in detail the
>> main ch
On Fri, 18 Oct 2024 19:03:30 GMT, Sean Mullan wrote:
>> This is the implementation of JEP 486: Permanently Disable the Security
>> Manager. See [JEP 486](https://openjdk.org/jeps/486) for more details. The
>> [CSR](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8338412) describes in detail the
>> main ch
46 matches
Mail list logo
