On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 03:37:52PM -0700, Kleve wrote:
>
>
>
> there is a bug in GNU Parted Version (1.8.9) Assertion (cluster <
> fs_ubgi-> cluster_count + 2)at calc.c:378 in function
> fat_cluster_to_frag() failed.segmentation fault resize fat failed!
> Aborting! Please reboot.
That version o
Edward wrote:
> edward@Ubuntu:/media$ gnome-format
>
> (gnome-format:14268): Gtk-WARNING **: Ignoring the separator setting
>
> (gnome-format:14268): Gtk-WARNING **: Ignoring the separator setting
>
> (gnome-format:14268): Gtk-WARNING **: No object called:
> Error: Error opening /dev/sdc: Permissi
On 28 December 2010 01:59, Ram Dur wrote:
> Assertion (dev != NULL) at ../../libparted/disk.c:185 in function
> ped_disk_new() failed.
Without knowing the exact version you were using, this information is
difficult to use.
Could you also report the version?
BR Håkon Løvdal
_
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 11:51:42AM +0100, Jim Meyering wrote:
> Rudy Gevaert wrote:
> ...
> > If I then quiet parted I get
> > *** glibc detected *** parted: double free or corruption (out):
> > 0x7efff7afcab0 ***
> >
> > That is then only with parted 1.8.8.git.2008.03.24-11.1.
> >
> >
> >
Rudy Gevaert wrote:
...
> If I then quiet parted I get
> *** glibc detected *** parted: double free or corruption (out):
> 0x7efff7afcab0 ***
>
> That is then only with parted 1.8.8.git.2008.03.24-11.1.
>
>
> So to conclude:
> 1) In my case, doing things with -s enabled doesn't work (either ver
> Thats a shame :(.
Yes it is. But alas, I will have to take the time and try out later versions.
I was hoping that one or more of the developers would be able to respond to the
list and tell me.
> Well, I've been using parted for my partitioning needs for quite some
> time and it seem to wor
>
> -Nathan
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Joel Granados"
> To: "Nathan Boettcher"
> Cc: bug-parted@gnu.org
> Sent: Monday, May 4, 2009 4:10:02 AM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacific
> Subject: Re: error scripting parted using the mkfs c
: Monday, May 4, 2009 4:10:02 AM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacific
Subject: Re: error scripting parted using the mkfs command
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 12:44:16PM -0700, Nathan Boettcher wrote:
> I have been trying to use parted to help automate the creation of a disk
> image that I can then write
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 12:44:16PM -0700, Nathan Boettcher wrote:
> I have been trying to use parted to help automate the creation of a disk
> image that I can then write to a card/disk/etc. I use sfdisk to partition
> the image due to parted's inability to update/create the partition table (or
2008/5/18 spa malling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi
>
> I had an error during partitioning a new HD.
>
> Is there a limit to the number of partitions that gparted can do?
Hi. This is actually a limitation of the linux kernel because of the
allocation of minor device numbers. For scsi devices (block
ma
"VomLehn, David" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>When you have a disk with no partition table and you use:
>
>mkpart -s /dev/hda mklabel msdos
>
>you get the message:
>
>Error: SEGV_MAPERR (Address not mapped to object)Aborted
>
>The attached patch fixes that problem.
I think thi
When you have a disk with no partition table and you use:
mkpart -s /dev/hda mklabel msdos
you get the message:
Error: SEGV_MAPERR (Address not mapped to object)Aborted
The attached patch fixes that problem.
--
David VomLehn, Staff O/S Software Engineer
Scientific Atlanta, A Ci
"Ronald W. Henderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Error: SEGV_MAPERR (Address not mapped to object)Aborted
Hello Ronald,
Could you please grab our stable branch and build it? It has a
backtrace support on the signal handling method and allow us to get
more information when it happens.
If you
On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 05:43:16PM +0200, Benjamin Cama wrote:
> So this is my (far less detailled than before) bug-report about this :
Sorry I didn't mention it earlier, but I suggest that you additionally
file a bug at
http://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?atid=410685&group_id=30287&func=browse
Th
try upgrading to the latest libparted (1.6.25.1) and gparted (0.2) .
On Thu, 2006-02-02 at 06:23 -0800, Goh Lu Feng wrote:
> Please email a bug report to bug-parted@gnu.org
> containing the version (1.6.21) and the following
> message:Assertion ((C * heads + H) * sectors + S == A)
> at ../../libpa
On Mon, 19 Dec 2005 17:17:57 +0100
B.Hakvoort <"B.Hakvoort" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
> parted:
> Error: Invalid partition table on /UNIONFS/dev/hda -- wrong
> signature 0.
This means the magic number is wrong (i.e. 0).
Most likely the partition table got corrupted.
Rewrite it with g
Hi,
Hmmz, they're not overlapping. I'm not sure what causes this problem,
maybe it has something to do with this extended partition? are you sure
you use /dev/hda2 as SWAP partition? that seems quite weird :)
I think the answer is somewhere in the 2 errors you get while listing
the table. I guess
Dear Bart,
i guess some partitions are overlapping.
could you send us the output of 'fdisk -lu' ?
Et voila':
Warning: invalid flag 0x of partition table 5 will be corrected by w(rite)
Disk /dev/hda: 30.0 GB, 30005821440 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 3648 cylinders, total 586051
Hi Ugo,
i guess some partitions are overlapping.
could you send us the output of 'fdisk -lu' ?
thnks :)
On Mon, 2005-12-19 at 16:07 +0100, Ugo Locatelli wrote:
> Dear Sir/Madame
> (in case either Bart or Harley is in touch, Hi),
>
> mmm I'm a little confused, perhaps by the f
Dear Sir/Madame
(in case either Bart or Harley is in touch, Hi),
mmm I'm a little confused, perhaps by the front-end (I'm used to
play with KDE, so I'm in trouble with gparted).
Summary:
1) downloaded and installed parted_1.6.25
2) installed gparted (version 0.0.8-1) by a
On 12/17/05, Ugo Locatelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please, may you tell me where I can find the newest version?
> If the newest version too will give me the same message, I'll provide a
> more detailed description of the situation, as suggested by one of you.
There are links to 1.6.25.1 sourc
Dear Sir/Madame,
I've not yet got the newest (1.6.25) version, but I've found the
1.6.24-4 of libparted in the debian unstable repository and I've run it
(with the corresponding version 0.4.5-1 of qtparted):
no chanche! Same message of error. Please read it below:
%%%
On Fri, 2005-12-16 at 11:14 +0100, Ugo Locatelli wrote:
> Dear Sir/Madame,
> please read the following message I've got during an execution of
> qtparted.
>
> %%
>
> Please email a bug report to bug-parted@gnu.org containing the version
> (1.6.21) and the following messa
Hi Ugo,
Try upgrading to 1.6.25
cheers,
plors
On Fri, 2005-12-16 at 11:14 +0100, Ugo Locatelli wrote:
> Dear Sir/Madame,
> please read the following message I've got during an execution of
> qtparted.
>
> %%
>
> Please email a bug report to bug-parted@gnu.org containi
24 matches
Mail list logo
