Hi,
Hmmz, they're not overlapping. I'm not sure what causes this problem,
maybe it has something to do with this extended partition? are you sure
you use /dev/hda2 as SWAP partition? that seems quite weird :)
I think the answer is somewhere in the 2 errors you get while listing
the table. I guess someone on this list will know what they mean
exactly:
fdisk:
Warning: invalid flag 0x0000 of partition table 5 will be
corrected by w(rite)
parted:
Error: Invalid partition table on /UNIONFS/dev/hda -- wrong
signature 0.
cheers,
plors
On Mon, 2005-12-19 at 16:58 +0100, Ugo Locatelli wrote:
> Dear Bart,
> > i guess some partitions are overlapping.
> > could you send us the output of 'fdisk -lu' ?
> >
>
> Et voila':
>
>
> Warning: invalid flag 0x0000 of partition table 5 will be corrected by w(rite)
> Disk /dev/hda: 30.0 GB, 30005821440 bytes
> 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 3648 cylinders, total 58605120 sectors
> Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
>
> Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
> /dev/hda1 * 63 16305974 8152956 c Win95 FAT32 (LBA)
> /dev/hda2 16305975 17864279 779152+ 5 Extended
> /dev/hda3 20932695 58605119 18836212+ 83 Linux
> /dev/hda4 17864280 20932694 1534207+ 83 Linux
>
> Partition table entries are not in disk order
>
>
> Thanks,
> ciao,
> Ugo
>
>
> P.S. I've also played directly with cfdisk, but I don't remember if before
> or after qtparted began to give me error messages.
_______________________________________________
Bug-parted mailing list
Bug-parted@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-parted
